cs.CVMar 23, 2026

Physics-Aware Diffusion for LiDAR Point Cloud Densification

Authors: Zeping Zhang, Robert Laganière

Organizations: VIVA Research Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

LiDAR perception is severely limited by the distance-dependent sparsity of distant objects. While diffusion models can recover dense geometry, they suffer from prohibitive latency and physical hallucinations manifesting as ghost points. We propose Scanline-Consistent Range-Aware Diffusion, a framework that treats densification as probabilistic refinement rather than generation. By leveraging Partial Diffusion (SDEdit) on a coarse prior, we achieve high-fidelity results in just 156ms. Our novel Ray-Consistency loss and Negative Ray Augmentation enforce sensor physics to suppress artifacts. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results on KITTI-360 and nuScenes, directly boosting off-the-shelf 3D detectors without retraining. Code will be made available.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jun 14, 2026

PointDiffusion: Diffusion-Based Scene Completion in the Point Cloud Domain

Reconstructing dense 3D scenes from sparse LiDAR point clouds is a fundamental challenge in autonomous driving, where latent diffusion models offer a promising solution. However, existing approaches rely on object-level autoencoders that collapse into unstable global representations at outdoor scale and suffer from ground truth data corrupted by odometry drift that systematically degrades supervision quality. Furthermore, multi-step diffusion inference incurs prohibitive latency for real-time deployment. We propose a novel multi-token Gaussian VAE with cross-attention pooling for stable scene-scale LiDAR compression, combined with an anchor-based ICP ground truth refinement pipeline that eliminates drift-induced noise from training supervision. Together, these components enable a scaffold-free single-step diffusion completion model that achieves an approximately 16x reduction in squared Chamfer distance on SemanticKITTI seq. 08 (0.396 m^2 to 0.024 m^2), surpasses LiDiff and ScoreLiDAR by 17-19% and 10-11%, respectively, and operates at 25-143x lower inference latency. Our results demonstrate that data quality dominates model design in this regime and that multi-token latent spaces provide a stable first stage for latent diffusion-based scene completion.
Feb 22, 2026

L3DR: 3D-aware LiDAR Diffusion and Rectification

Range-view (RV) based LiDAR diffusion has recently made huge strides towards 2D photo-realism. However, it neglects 3D geometry realism and often generates various RV artifacts such as depth bleeding and wavy surfaces. We design L3DR, a 3D-aware LiDAR Diffusion and Rectification framework that can regress and cancel RV artifacts in 3D space and restore local geometry accurately. Our theoretical and empirical analysis reveals that 3D models are inherently superior to 2D models in generating sharp and authentic boundaries. Leveraging such analysis, we design a 3D residual regression network that rectifies RV artifacts and achieves superb geometry realism by predicting point-level offsets in 3D space. On top of that, we design a Welsch Loss that helps focus on local geometry and ignore anomalous regions effectively. Extensive experiments over multiple benchmarks including KITTI, KITTI360, nuScenes and Waymo show that the proposed L3DR achieves state-of-the-art generation and superior geometry-realism consistently. In addition, L3DR is generally applicable to different LiDAR diffusion models with little computational overhead.
Oct 6, 2026

LiDAR Resolution Recovery via Foundation-Model-Guided Diffusion

High-beam-count LiDAR sensors are costly, yet many perception pipelines require dense angular sampling. Using a pretrained Stable Diffusion model as the backbone, we fine-tune a LiDAR-conditioned depth model with pseudo-depth targets from a 2D foundation model. During training, the LiDAR conditioning is randomly decimated at different beam budgets. We then investigate how much of a LiDAR scan can be recovered from heavily decimated input and characterize performance across the input beam budget. We evaluate against physically held-out real beams on nuScenes and report recovery separately from fit accuracy. Our model yields its largest advantage in very sparse regimes, achieving a δ1.25δ_{1.25} accuracy of 66.866.8% from 44-beam input where scattered interpolation reaches only 45.145.1%. A class-stratified error breakdown further reveals that planar surfaces recover first while objects introducing depth discontinuities degrade earliest. Together, these results quantify the recovery/resolution trade-off for foundation-model-guided LiDAR enhancement.