Organizations: Beihang University · Civil Aviation University of China · Beijing Institute of Technology · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · Tianjin University · Tsinghua University · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Peking University · Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences · National University of Defense Technology
Multimodal Large Language Models have demonstrated powerful cross-modal understanding and reasoning capabilities in general domains. However, in the electromagnetic (EM) domain, they still face challenges such as data scarcity and insufficient integration of domain knowledge. This paper proposes PReD, the first foundation model for the EM domain that covers the intelligent closed-loop of "perception, recognition, decision-making." We constructed a high-quality multitask EM dataset, PReD-1.3M, and an evaluation benchmark, PReD-Bench. The dataset encompasses multi-perspective representations such as raw time-domain waveform, frequency-domain spectrograms, and constellation diagrams, covering typical features of communication and radar signals. It supports a range of core tasks, including signal detection, modulation recognition, parameter estimation, protocol recognition, radio frequency fingerprint recognition, and anti-jamming decision-making. PReD adopts a multi-stage training strategy that unifies multiple tasks for EM signals. It achieves closed-loop optimization from end-to-end signal understanding to language-driven reasoning and decision-making, significantly enhancing EM domain expertise while maintaining general multimodal capabilities. Experimental results show that PReD achieves state-of-the-art performance on PReD-Bench constructed from both open-source and self-collected signal datasets. These results collectively validate the feasibility and potential of vision-aligned foundation models in advancing the understanding and reasoning of EM signals.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of PReD and its capabilities, instantiated across six core electromagnetic (EM) tasks that span the three tiers of perception, recognition, and decision-making. The figure demonstrates how PReD processes multi-view signal visualizations to address a diverse range of EM instructions, from quantitative parameter estimation to open-ended anti-jamming strategy generation.
Figure 2: Overall pipeline for the construction of the PReD-1.3M training set and the PReD-Bench. We first generate five types of signal visualizations from the raw IQ signals. We then create corresponding OpenQA and MCQA pairs for each task type to form a complete instruction set. Finally, a portion of this set is sampled to obtain the PReD-Bench, which is kept strictly separate from the training data.
Figure 3: Scale and composition of the EM training dataset across six tasks and two QA formats.
Dimension
Task
OpenQA
MCQA
EM Perception
SPE
2250
750
SSD
1700
300
EM Recognition
MR
–
500
PR
–
500
EI
–
458
EM Decision-making
AJSD
2000
–
Table 1: PReD-Bench for perception, recognition, and decision-making. Abbreviations: SSD = Signal Segment Detection; SPE = Signal Parameter Estimation; MR = Modulation Recognition; PR = Protocol Recognition; EI = Emitter Identification; AJSD = Anti-Jamming Strategy Decision-making. OpenQA and MCQA denote open-ended and multiple-choice question–answer pairs, respectively.
Figure 4: Overall pipeline of PReD. (Bottom to top) Multi-view EM renderings are encoded and projected into the token space, where they are combined with tokenized instructions. A pre-trained LLM decoder is first aligned with visual features and then fine-tuned through a multi-stage curriculum to become the specialized PReD LLM Decoder . The model supports two output modes: open-ended generation (OpenQA) and structured multiple-choice question answering (MCQA).
Category
Hyperparameter
Stage-1
Stage-2
Stage-3
Stage-4
Vision
Resolution
384
Max 384×(2×2)
Max 384×(6×6)
Max 384×(6×6)
Tokens
729
Max 729×5
Max 729×10
Max 729×10
Data
Dataset
LCS
General Single-Image
General Multi-Image*
PReD-1.3M *
Samples
558K
858K
832K
1.8M
Model
Trainable Components
Projector
Full Model
Full Model
Full Model
Tunable Parameters
21.5M
8.6B
8.6B
8.6B
Table 2: Training schedule for PReD across four stages on 16 NVIDIA A100 GPUs (80GB each). A star * indicates datasets mixed with general visual corpora from earlier stages.
Model
EM Perception
EM Recognition
EM Decision-Making
SSD
SPE
MR
PR
EI
AJSD ( OpenQA # )
MCQA
OpenQA ∗
MCQA
OpenQA ∗
MCQA
MCQA
MCQA
BLEU4
ROUGE
METEOR
CIDEr
qwen2.5-vl-7b † [ 38 ]
28.7
0.2
20.5
0.1
24.2
14.0
–
0.000
0.079
0.115
0.128
qwen3-vl-8b † [ 36 ]
21.3
1.3
18.8
2.0
11.6
2.8
–
0.000
0.094
0.121
0.228
qwen3-vl-235b-a22b † [ 36 ]
27.7
0.5
30.4
2.0
20.2
8.6
–
0.000
0.090
0.070
0.151
seed-1.6 vision [ 39 ]
41.3
1.5
40.4
3.1
23.4
21.4
–
0.000
0.095
0.039
0.169
Table 3: Benchmark results for EM perception, recognition, and decision-making tasks. A superscript † marks an Instruct (instruction-tuned) variant. OpenQA ∗ indicates answers with a specific tag whose results are directly matched; OpenQA # indicates answers without a specific tag, where matching is performed using BLEU4, ROUGE, METEOR, and CIDEr. Since EI task requires device-specific RF fingerprint learning, general MLLMs arenot comparable and their results are omitted.
Model
MMStar
AI2D
HallusionBench
SEEDBench IMG
POPE
ScienceQA TEST
Average
GPT - 4v [ 3 ]
49.7
75.9
46.5
71.6
75.4
82.1
66.9
PReD (Ours)
50.2
74.3
54.5
73.7
70.4
69.2
65.4
Qwen - VL - Max [ 43 ]
49.5
75.7
41.2
72.7
71.9
80.0
65.2
LLaVA - Next - Interleave - 7B [ 44 ]
44.5
73.8
34.8
72.0
85.5
73.2
64.0
DeepSeek - VL - 7B [ 45 ]
40.5
65.3
34.5
70.1
85.6
80.9
62.8
MiniCPM - V - 2 [ 46 ]
39.1
62.9
36.1
67.1
86.3
80.7
62.0
Table 4: Results on general multimodal benchmarks.
Appendix figures & tables11 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 5: Overview of our four-stage curriculum and data composition. The outer ring shows the training stages; the middle ring indicates data regimes (LCS, general single/multi-image); the inner ring lists EM tasks (SSD, SSE, MR, PR, EI, AJSD) emphasized in Stage 4. Percentages denote the proportion of samples used per stage.
Category
Hyperparameter
Stage-1
Stage-2
Stage-3
Stage-4
Vision
Resolution
384
Max 384×(2×2)
Max 384×(6×6)
Max 384×(6×6)
Tokens
729
Max 729×5
Max 729×10
Max 729×10
Model
Trainable Components
Projector
Full Model
Full Model
Full Model
Tunable Parameters
21.5M
8.6B
8.6B
8.6B
Training
Per-device Batch Size
8
4
2
2
Gradient Accumulation
1
1
1
1
Appendix
Table 5: Training schedule across four curriculum stages.
Method
SSD
SPE
MR
PR
EI
AJSD
Average
PReD - (w/o General Corpora)
83.55
86.37
72.40
74.40
71.83
50.05
73.10
PReD (Ours)
83.40
85.70
72.00
72.00
69.43
48.59
71.85
Appendix
Table 6: Performance comparison on the specialized EM benchmark. The variant fine-tuned exclusively on EM data ( PReD - ) achieves a marginal performance gain on these domain-specific tasks. As shown in Table 7 , this slight advantage comes at the cost of a severe degradation in general multimodal capabilities.
Method
MMStar
AI2D
HallusionBench
SEEDBench IMG
POPE
ScienceQA TEST
Average
PReD - (w/o General Corpora)
39.47
54.44
8.10
56.75
0.74
56.02
35.92
PReD (Ours)
50.20
74.32
54.47
73.67
70.37
69.16
65.37
Appendix
Table 7: Ablation study on mixing general-domain data in the final training stage. We compare our full model ( PReD ) against a variant ( PReD - ) that was fine-tuned exclusively on the specialized EM dataset without the general visual corpora. Mixing general-domain data significantly prevents catastrophic forgetting and boosts performance across general benchmarks.
Constellation
FFT
STFT
IQ
Accuracy
✓
×
×
×
43.4
×
✓
×
×
35.0
×
×
✓
×
30.2
×
×
×
✓
50.8
✓
✓
×
×
54.8
✓
×
✓
×
58.4
Appendix
Table 8: MR accuracy (%) for different modality combinations. The optimal result is highlighted in bold.
Input Modality
BLEU4
ROUGE
METEOR
CIDEr
Average
Constellation
0.069
0.329
0.227
0.405
0.258
FFT
0.056
0.305
0.194
0.381
0.234
STFT
0.094
0.374
0.267
0.447
0.2955
IQ
0.149
0.438
0.337
0.530
0.363
Constellation+FFT
0.070
0.331
0.227
0.409
0.259
Constellation+STFT
0.104
0.384
0.279
0.465
0.308
Appendix
Table 9: Ablation on input modalities for the anti-jamming strategy decision-making task.
Figure 6: Zero-shot modulation recognition accuracy of PReD on the OOD RadioML2016.04c dataset across SNR levels. The overall accuracy is 66.0%.
Figure 7: Performance comparison on MR and PR task across varying SNR levels. Both tasks show a similar graceful degradation, highlighting the model’s consistent and robust behavior against noise.
Figure 8: Hierarchical composition of the PReD-Bench, showing the distribution across three core dimensions, six specific tasks, and two primary question types (OpenQA and MCQA).
Figure 9: Log-scale radar plot of averaged performance over five EM tasks. PReD demonstrates superior performance across all evaluated tasks.
Figure 10: Qualitative examples of PReD’s performance across the six core tasks of PReD-Bench. Each panel showcases a different capability, from perception (a, b), to recognition (c, d, e), and finally to complex decision-making (f).
Wireless foundation models learn reusable representations of radio channels, signals, network traces, and telemetry for transfer across wireless tasks and settings.
The paradigm of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) offers a promising blueprint for advancing the electromagnetic (EM) domain. However, prevailing approaches often deviate from the native MLLM paradigm, instead using task-specific or pipelined architectures that lead to fundamental limitations in model performance and generalization. Fully realizing the MLLM potential in EM domain requires overcoming three main challenges: (1) Data. The scarcity of high-quality datasets with paired EM signals and descriptive text annotations used for MLLMs pre-training; (2) Benchmark. The absence of comprehensive benchmarks to systematically evaluate and compare the performance of models on EM signal-to-text tasks; (3) Model. A critical fragility in low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) environments, where critical signal features can be obscured, leading to significant performance degradation. To address these challenges, we introduce a tripartite contribution to establish a foundation for MLLMs in the EM domain. First, to overcome data scarcity, we construct and release EM-100k, a large-scale dataset comprising over 100,000 EM signal-text pairs. Second, to enable rigorous and standardized evaluation, we propose EM-Bench, the most comprehensive benchmark featuring diverse downstream tasks spanning from perception to reasoning. Finally, to tackle the core modeling challenge, we present MERLIN, a novel training framework designed not only to align low-level signal representations with high-level semantic text, but also to explicitly enhance model robustness and performance in challenging low-SNR environments. Comprehensive experiments validate our method, showing that MERLIN is state-of-the-art in the EM-Bench and exhibits remarkable robustness in low-SNR settings.
Junyu Shen, Zhendong She, Chenghanyu Zhang +13
Tsinghua University · Tianjin University · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications +6
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as code agents for scientific and engineering analysis, but their ability to analyze raw physical-layer measurements remains untested. We introduce EMRB (Electromagnetic Reasoning Benchmark), which evaluates whether LLMs can analyze raw I/Q data by writing and running code. EMRB contains 200 problems across five difficulty levels and 27 question types, from signal detection to OFDM design, generated from 11 signal types with verified ground truth. Unlike benchmarks built on preprocessed features or structured tables, EMRB provides only the raw capture; the quantities each question refers to must first be discovered through code. We evaluate 14 LLMs spanning proprietary, open-weight, and reasoning-oriented families. Scores range from 24.1% to 78.9%, with the mean dropping from 84.9% on basic measurement to 21.2% on system design. We also propose ReconPilot, a structured method that separates signal reconnaissance, targeted analysis, and self-verification. Across three backbones, ReconPilot raises the overall score by 3.8 to 17.6 points and improves 13 of 15 backbone-level combinations tested. All data and code are publicly released in blue{our GitHub repository}.
Mingxu Zhang, Ying Sun, Yuhan Li +4
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · The 63rd Research Institute, National University of Defense Technology · Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Electromagnetic spectrum monitoring increasingly requires flexible analysis beyond task-specific recognition and detection. Multimodal large language models offer a unified interface, but extending vision-language models (VLMs) to raw I/Q signals requires tokenization that balances fidelity against a strict budget. For signals, dense encoding causes token costs to grow with observation length, whereas fixed-resolution compression may discard short-duration or localized signal evidence. Thus, we propose BATok, a budget-adaptive signal tokenizer that adjusts token capacity to the input length while allocating that capacity according to the signal content. BATok constructs candidate representations from signal-derived features using lightweight multi-resolution branches, then combines a local energy prior with learnable queries to resample these representations into compact signal tokens. The number of tokens adapts to the input length while remaining strictly bounded. The resulting tokens are projected into the language embedding space of VLMs. We further introduce EMSpec-Instruct, a multimodal instruction dataset aligning raw I/Q signals, waterfall images, and language supervision for modulation recognition, structured detection, and language-conditioned signal grounding. Experiments show that BATok learns effective signal representations and achieves competitive performance across all tasks.
Lei Zhai, Zhihao Chang, Shuyuan Yang +1
School of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi’an, China