See it to Place it: Evolving Macro Placements with Vision-Language Models

Automated macro placement remains a fundamental challenge in VLSI physical design. Despite decades of research, existing approaches predominantly optimize hand-crafted proxy objectives, such as estimated wirelength, and typically produce placements through one-shot numerical optimization, limiting their ability to incorporate visual layout context, codified design expertise, and downstream physical-design feedback in a unified loop. We present PlaceReasoner-Beta, a verifier-guided multi-agent framework that reformulates macro placement as a closed-loop reasoning problem rather than black-box optimization. A vision-language model (VLM) planner generates candidate placements from the floorplan image, macro specifications, and connectivity structure; a geometric verifier enforces physical legality and expert placement principles; a physical verifier refines candidates using early implementation feedback; and a post-route optimizer further improves promising layouts using final PPA. To enable reproducible evaluation, we introduce PlaceReasoner-Bench, a fully open end-to-end benchmark built from open RTL designs, EDA tools, and technology libraries. It comprises 8 designs at two aspect ratios, yielding 16 tasks with fixed floorplans and I/O assignments, so methods differ only in macro positions and orientations and are evaluated using routed PPA and DRC rather than pre-route proxies. Across the benchmark, PlaceReasoner-Beta achieves the best timing among DRC-clean methods on all square tasks, reducing post-route TNS by 61.2% at 1:1 and 53.0% at 2:1 relative to the classical baseline field. It also shortens routed wirelength on most designs despite never explicitly optimizing it, demonstrating that reasoning over spatial structure under physical-design feedback can improve end-to-end layout quality beyond proxy-objective optimization.

Macro placement is a fundamental step in modern chip physical design, playing a crucial role in determining the solution quality of high-dimensional combinatorial optimization problems. Despite recent advancements in machine learning for spatial coordinate determination, the temporal dimension of placement sequencing remains largely governed by static heuristics. In this work, we demonstrate that the placement sequence is not merely a preprocessing step but a decisive factor in optimization, where suboptimal early decisions trigger irreversible domino effects that constrain the solution space. To harness this unexplored dimension, we propose OrderPlace, a proxy-guided LLM evolution framework for automatically discovering macro placement order strategies. Instead of relying on manually crafted heuristics such as area- or connectivity-based ordering, OrderPlace explores a broader space of code-level policies, ranging from static scoring metrics to dynamic physics-inspired mechanisms. To mitigate the prohibitive cost of evaluating sequences, we introduce a lightweight proxy evaluation mechanism that efficiently filters candidates using a deterministic greedy probe. Experimental results on the standard ISPD 2005 benchmarks demonstrate that OrderPlace discovers novel ordering strategies. Compared with WireMask-EA and the state-of-the-art method EGPlace, OrderPlace reduces wirelength by 34.04% and 14.08%, respectively.

Chip placement plays an important role in physical design. While generative models like diffusion models offer promising learning-based solutions, current methods have the following limitations: they use random synthetic data for pre-training, require long sampling times, and often result in overlaps due to their dependence on gradient-based solvers during the sampling process. To overcome these issues, we propose FlowPlace, which features mask-guided synthetic data generation, flow-based efficient training with flexible prior injection, and hard constraint sampling for overlap-free layouts. Experiments on OpenROAD and ICCAD 2015 benchmarks show FlowPlace achieves better PPA metrics, 10-50$\times$ faster sampling efficiency, and zero overlaps.