Diagnosing Long-Video Quantitative Reasoning in Multimodal LLMs via Enumeration and Counting

Video multimodal large language models achieve strong results on existing benchmarks, but answer accuracy alone does not establish whether they can locate the evidence needed to answer a question. We introduce VideoZeroBench, a challenging long-video benchmark with manually annotated question-answer pairs spanning 13 video domains. Questions target fine-grained cues, fleeting events, and evidence distributed across multiple segments. Temporal intervals and key-frame boxes are annotated where applicable. All questions undergo two rounds of cross-verification for answer validity and evidence quality. Our five-level diagnostic protocol compares answering with and without evidence hints, then combines answer correctness with independently evaluated temporal and spatial grounding. Across 19 evaluated models, the best standard QA accuracy is 24.8% (Level-3), achieved by Gemini-3.7-Flash. No model exceeds 1.8% when correct answers and accurate spatio-temporal localization are jointly required (Level-5). Analyses of atomic abilities, evidence spans, input modalities, and thinking-with-videos inference further characterize where the evaluated systems struggle. These findings motivate more precise evidence search and localization for long-video question answering. Our code and data are publicly released.

Video-grounded numerical reasoning requires Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to identify, track, and combine quantitative evidence across frames, actions, and scene changes. Existing benchmarks provide fragmented coverage: general VideoQA includes counting among broader tasks, while dedicated benchmarks focus on repetition counting, ultra-long-video enumeration, or instructional mathematics. We introduce VidNum, a manually curated and independently verified benchmark containing 1,167 multiple-choice questions. Its three task groups distinguish Direct and Distinct Enumeration, Conditioned and Structured Enumeration, and Compositional Quantitative Reasoning. Question-level annotations further identify the evidence target, counting structure, and required reasoning operation. The best evaluated VLM reaches 59.8% accuracy, compared with 98.2% for human annotators, and no evaluated open-weight model exceeds 45%. Stratified analyses reveal that failures are not uniformly distributed: structured target construction and action-grounded compositional reasoning form recurring bottlenecks across models. Zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting is not a reliable remedy: it recovers some errors but breaks previously correct answers, with effects that vary across models and task structures. VidNum therefore supports diagnostic analysis beyond a single aggregate score.

Large vision-language models (VLMs) can recognize what happens in video but fail to count how many times. We introduce PushupBench, 446 long-form clips (avg. 36.7s) for evaluating repetition counting. The best frontier model achieves 42.1% exact accuracy; open-source 4B models score $\sim$6%, matching supervised baselines. We show that accuracy alone misleads -- weaker models exploit the modal count rather than reason temporally. Fine-tuning on counting with 1k samples transfers to general video understanding: MVBench (+2.15), PerceptionTest (+1.88), TVBench (+4.54), suggesting counting is a proxy for broader temporal reasoning.PushupBench incorporated in lmms-eval (https://github.com/EvolvingLMMs-Lab/lmms-eval/pull/1262) and hosted on (pushupbench.com/)