Structural Feature Engineering for Generative Engine Optimization: How Content Structure Shapes Citation Behavior
Organizations: The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan · University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan · Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan · The University of Tokyo / National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
The proliferation of AI-powered search engines has shifted information discovery from traditional link-based retrieval to direct answer generation with selective source citation, creating new challenges for content visibility. While existing Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) approaches focus primarily on semantic content modification, the role of structural features in influencing citation behavior remains underexplored. In this paper, we propose GEO-SFE, a systematic framework for structural feature engineering in generative engine optimization. Our approach decomposes content structure into three hierarchical levels: macro-structure (document architecture), meso-structure (information chunking), and micro-structure (visual emphasis), and models their impact on citation probability across different generative engine architectures. We develop architecture-aware optimization strategies and predictive models that preserve semantic integrity while improving structural effectiveness. Experimental evaluation across six mainstream generative engines demonstrates consistent improvements in citation rate (17.3 percent) and subjective quality (18.5 percent), validating the effectiveness and generalizability of the proposed framework. This work establishes structural optimization as a foundational component of GEO, providing a data-driven methodology for enhancing content visibility in LLM-powered information ecosystems.
Figures & tables
| Architecture Type | Query Processing | Retrieval & Generation Pipeline | Citation Mechanism | GEO Target Focus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Generative Engine [ 8 ] | Query decomposition into sub-queries { … } | Search engine retrieval → Document summarization → Multi-source synthesis | Direct URL citations in response | Semantic clarity, structured data |
| Web-Enhanced RAG [ 9 ] | Direct query to web search | Web content retrieval → Context augmentation → Response generation | Appended source list | Freshness, E-E-A-T signals |
| RAG-Fusion [ 10 , 11 ] | LLM generates query variants | Parallel searches → RRF score fusion → Reranked document list | Multi-source attribution | Query diversity coverage |
| Hybrid Search [ 12 ] | Parallel keyword + vector processing | Dual retrieval paths → RRF fusion → Unified ranking | Combined lexical-semantic sources | Keyword-semantic balance |
| Query Rewriting [ 13 ] | SLM-driven query optimization | Rewritten queries → Web API calls → Semantic reranking | Relevance-ordered citations | Query intent alignment |
| Multi-Hop Retrieval [ 14 ] | Recursive query decomposition | Initial search → Query refinement → Iterative retrieval | Hierarchical source layers | Complex reasoning paths |
| Architecture | Feature | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Search-then-Synthesize | Meta-structure clarity | 0.45 |
| Upfront density | 0.30 | |
| Hierarchical depth | 0.25 | |
| Iterative Refinement | Cross-reference richness | 0.41 |
| Hierarchical breadth-depth | 0.35 | |
| Query-triggering keywords | 0.24 |
| Architecture | Platforms | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Search-then-Syn | Google SGE, Bing Chat | Batch retrieval |
| Iterative Refine | Perplexity AI, Phind | Multi-round search |
| Integrated S-G | ChatGPT, Claude | Real-time retrieval |
| Architecture | Citation Rate (%) | Visibility Score | Improve | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | Opt | Base | Opt | (%) | |
| Search-then-Syn | 43.7 | 52.1 | 0.401 | 0.481 | +19.2* |
| Iterative Refine | 52.3 | 59.6 | 0.474 | 0.541 | +14.0* |
| Integrated S-G | 39.1 | 46.8 | 0.358 | 0.428 | +19.7* |
| Overall | 45.0 | 52.8 | 0.411 | 0.483 | +17.3* |
| * , paired t-test, , Cohen’s d = 0.64 | |||||
| Metric | Baseline | GEO-SFE | Improvement (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relevance | 18.7 2.8 | 22.3 2.5 | +19.3 |
| Influence | 17.5 3.2 | 23.1 2.7 | +32.0 |
| Uniqueness | 21.3 2.2 | 23.6 2.0 | +10.8 |
| Subj. Position | 19.1 2.9 | 22.8 2.6 | +19.4 |
| Subj. Count | 20.8 2.5 | 23.4 2.3 | +12.5 |
| Click Probability | 17.2 3.4 | 22.6 2.9 | +31.4 |
| Configuration | CR (%) | VS | Drop | Contrib |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Optimization | 52.8 | 0.483 | — | 100% |
| w/o Macro | 49.3 | 0.451 | -3.5 | 44.9% |
| w/o Meso | 49.7 | 0.455 | -3.1 | 39.7% |
| w/o Micro | 51.6 | 0.473 | -1.2 | 15.4% |
| Baseline | 45.0 | 0.411 | -7.8 | — |
Generative Engine Optimization
Generative Engine Optimization studies how to make web content visible, cited, and accurately represented in AI-generated search answers.
See all 40 papers