Benchmark for Assessing Olfactory Perception of Large Language Models

The relationship between odor chemistry and perception remains incompletely understood. Many existing studies focus on the perception of single molecules, whereas natural odors contain tens to hundreds of components, adding extra layer of complexity to percept formation. Here, we explore the relationship between molecular composition and perceived similarity in natural odor objects. We study this using a database of more than 1,200 volatile-compound-in-food mixtures containing more than 8,000 molecular components, and use large language models (LLMs) as a scalable surrogate for deriving mixture-level perceptual descriptions. We find that language-derived representations provide useful supervision for predicting held-out mixture similarities from molecular composition. The prediction was consistently strongest when perceptual targets were derived from chemosensory prompts than from other sensory prompts. Further, during the mixture-level training, we learned low-rank molecular embeddings that enabled better prediction of held-out mixture similarities than component-overlap metrics, even for mixture pairs with no shared molecules. Although no single-molecule labels were used during training, the learned molecular geometry showed significant alignment with the independent human odor-descriptor space. Finally, we explored the use of external molecular features in our mixture-similarity prediction task. These features showed modest zero-shot alignment with mixture-level perceptual similarity. They improved prediction under limited supervision but offered little additional predictive benefit with the full training set. Together, these results show that language-derived descriptions can provide scalable supervision for predicting the perceptual organization of complex natural mixtures, contributing to a quantitative understanding of how molecular composition gives rise to odor perception.

Foundation models have transformed molecular property prediction, yet it remains unclear whether a molecular foundation model, fine-tuned on a single canonical olfactory prediction task, can learn representations that transfer across diverse machine olfaction problems. We investigate this question by fine-tuning Uni-Mol2 on the GS-LF benchmark for multi-label odor descriptor prediction and evaluating the resulting model, without additional deep-learning training, on four complementary downstream settings: cross-dataset odor descriptor prediction, odorous-versus-odorless classification, enantiomer evaluation, and odor mixture discriminability. The fine-tuned model matches or exceeds the performance of the state-of-the-art olfaction-specific baseline on the primary GS-LF benchmark and consistently transfers across these downstream evaluations. The enantiomer analysis further shows that three-dimensional molecular representations distinguish mirror-image molecules in a way that two-dimensional graph models fundamentally cannot, although accurately predicting the perceptual consequences of stereochemistry remains an open challenge. Together, these results support a train-once, transfer-across-tasks paradigm for machine olfaction and suggest that chemically pretrained molecular representations provide a strong foundation for transferable olfactory prediction.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for molecular tasks, but it remains unclear which molecular representation to use. We present a systematic benchmark evaluating LLM molecular competence across nine representations and eight chemical tasks. We benchmark 16 LLMs across five model families, including reasoning and non-reasoning variants, chemistry-specialized LLMs, and closed frontier models. Performance is strongly representation-dependent and no single representation wins across tasks, though CML is the best, followed by MolJSON, InChI, and then canonical SMILES. Explicit structured text representations (CML and MolJSON) dominate structural tasks; IUPAC dominates semantic tasks, winning molecule retrieval for all 16 LLMs; and SMILES variants are rarely optimal despite their prevalence in pretraining. Chemistry-specialized models perform well with SMILES at the cost of large degradations with structured text representations, suggesting SMILES-only evaluation rewards specialization that does not generalize. Using LLM-as-a-judge, we find that IUPAC produces the highest fraction of correct molecule generations. A mechanistic study via tokenization audits, linear probes and attention shows that representations are encoded differently inside the model; for example, structured representations require higher attention across the molecular span. Our results argue against representation-invariant evaluation and motivate task-aware representation routing for LLM-based chemistry.