Organizations: School of Information and Communication Engineering, Center for Information Geoscience, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731 China · School of Resources and Environment, Center for Information Geoscience, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731 China
Ground roll is a common type of coherent noise in seismic records, and its attenuation remains challenging due to its substantial overlap with useful reflections in localized regions. Existing attenuation methods can be broadly classified into global and local categories according to whether ground-roll-contaminated regions are explicitly identified. Global methods, however, typically impose uniform attenuation on both contaminated and uncontaminated regions, which may result in signal leakage or distortion of reflections. By contrast, local methods restrict attenuation to contaminated regions and are therefore less prone to unnecessary modification of clean areas. However, their performance is often limited by manually designed or simplistic model-based mask estimation strategies. To address these limitations, we propose a large vision model-guided masked low-rank approximation (LVM-LRA) framework for ground-roll attenuation. Within this framework, a promptable LVM is first employed to identify ground-roll-dominant regions in seismic records through multimodal prompting and to generate accurate, fine-grained masks. The estimated masks are then incorporated into an LRA model for ground-roll attenuation. A global low-rank constraint is imposed on the reflection component to preserve event continuity, whereas a mask-guided local low-rank constraint is imposed on the ground-roll component so that its separation is confined to the masked regions. An iterative optimization algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) is further developed to solve the resulting model efficiently. Experiments on synthetic and field datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves more effective ground-roll attenuation and better suppresses signal leakage than the baseline methods.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of the proposed LVM-LRA model.
Fig. 2: Denoising comparison on synthetic seismic data. (a) Original seismic data. Denoised results, removal noise, and local similarity comparisons using (b)(f)(j) proposed LVM-LRA, (c)(g)(k) LSVD, (d)(h)(l) F-K, and (e)(i)(m) INR.
Fig. 3: Spectral comparison of the denoised results in Fig. 2 : (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), Frequency–wavenumber spectra of Fig. 2 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), respectively.
Fig. 4: Single-trace comparison of the ground-roll at the 900-918 trace between the original ground-roll and the extracted components by (a) proposed LVM-LRA, (b) LSVD, (c) F-K, and (d) INR.
Prompt design
Mask IoU
Generic category-level text prompt (“ground-roll”)
0.58
Morphological text prompt only
0.71
Physical-property text prompt only
0.76
A visual prompt only
0.87
Morphological + Physical text prompts
0.82
Morphological text + Visual prompt
0.89
TABLE I: Ablation study of different prompt combinations for ground-roll mask generation in Stage I.
Fig. 5: Denoising comparison on the first real seismic data. (a) Original seismic data. Denoised results, removal noise, and local similarity comparisons using (b)(f)(j) proposed LVM-LRA, (c)(g)(k) LSVD, (d)(h)(l) F-K, and (e)(i)(m) INR.
Fig. 6: Spectral comparison of the denoised results in Fig. 5 : (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) Frequency–wavenumber spectra of Fig. 5 (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively.
Fig. 7: Denoising comparison on the second real seismic data. (a) Original seismic data. Denoised results, removal noise, and local similarity comparisons using (b)(f)(j) proposed LVM-LRA, (c)(g)(k) LSVD, (d)(h)(l) F-K, and (e)(i)(m) INR.
Fig. 8: Spectral comparison of the denoised results in Fig. 7 : (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) Frequency–wavenumber spectra of Fig. 7 (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively.
Methods
SNR(dB)
Local Similarity
Average
Variance
INR
−03.34
0.0834
0.0352
F-K
07.54
0.0897
0.0397
LSVD
02.55
0.0699
0.0456
Proposed LVM-LRA
14.50
0.0285
0.0100
TABLE II: Performance Comparison of Synthetic Seismic Data Based on SNR and Local Similarity Metrics
Fig. 9: Ground-roll localization masks for the synthetic dataset, the first field dataset, and the second field dataset, given by LVM-LRA in (a), (c), and (e), respectively, and by LSVD in (b), (d), and (f), respectively.
Methods
Real Seismic Data I
Real Seismic Data II
Average
Variance
Average
Variance
INR
0.0493
0.0164
0.2179
0.0635
F-K
{\color[rgb]{0,0,0}0.0481}
0.0111
0.1571
0.0415
LSVD
0.0101
0.0028
0.0092
0.0026
Proposed LVM-LRA
0.0057
0.0019
0.0049
0.0015
TABLE III: Performance Comparison of Real Seismic Data Based on Local Similarity Metrics
In marine seismic acquisition, seismic interference (SI) occurs when energy from nearby external seismic source(s) is captured. It typically appears as coherent noise with linear or non-linear movement and varying amplitudes across different sail lines. SI is commonly observed and poses a challenge for seismic data processing. We present a case history of a previously proposed deep neural network (DNN)-based workflow applied for SI attenuation across a marine seismic block in the Camie Field of Angola. This field survey covers over 345 km2 and is marked by the challenge of multiple SI types. The employed DNN-based workflow performs SI attenuation in the common shot domain based on a supervised learning framework: a small subset of the SI-contaminated data was first processed by a conventional geophysical algorithm to obtain an estimate of the SI noise, which was then manually blended with the SI-free common shot gathers from the same survey to generate the training pairs. To ensure signal fidelity, several techniques were applied to improve the DNN's performance. A key highlight of this case history is its scale: this represents a real-world, large-scale processing project and we present a comprehensive comparison of the DNN-based workflow with the conventional geophysical algorithm across the entire survey block, focusing on both processing quality and processing time. The results demonstrate the outstanding performance of the employed DNN-based workflow, which achieved higher SI removal accuracy, with less signal leakage and more complete SI removal. The promising results of this application also open up possibilities for integrating deep learning into other seismic denoising tasks. In addition, we discuss the limitations of this case history, aiming to provide insights for future research and applications in the field.
Jing Sun, Song Hou
Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6, Delft 2628 XE, The Netherlands. · VIRIDIEN (UK) Ltd, Crompton Way, Manor Royal Estate, Crawley, West Sussex RH10 9QN, UK.
EGGROLL (Sarkar et al., 2026) makes evolution strategies (ES) practical for LLMs by replacing dense Gaussian weight perturbations with low-rank Gaussian products, often of rank one. This choice is computationally attractive but geometrically severe: Each rank-one perturbation lies in a zero-volume subset of the ambient matrix space, despite having identity covariance. We characterize the EGGROLL update mean field at finite rank and nonzero perturbation radius as a resolvent applied to the gradient of the perturbation-smoothed objective. This transformation can make the mean field nonconservative and reverse the local stability of an optimum. EGGROLL nevertheless recovers the gradient exactly on quadratic objectives at every rank and radius. In finite populations, the additional sampling variance of rank-one perturbations relative to dense Gaussian ES decays inversely with matrix width under a local affine model, and is only 0.098% at width 4096. Finally, we introduce LOO-ROLL, a leave-one-out estimator that replaces EGGROLL's two antithetic evaluations per direction by one. At equal evaluation cost, LOO-ROLL halves estimator MSE in transformer blocks. Across fourteen post-training settings up to 14B parameters, matched-time comparisons with EGGROLL yield eleven improvements in individual paired tests and no significant loss. At 1.7B, 8B, and 14B parameters, matched-time gains are 2.9, 14.1, and 7.9 percentage points on GSM8K and 12.2, 8.4, and 8.1 points on MATH-500.
Ege C. Kaya, Abolfazl Hashemi
Elmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Large language model (LLM)-based autoregressive speech enhancement (SE) produces natural speech using learned clean-speech priors, but may hallucinate content unsupported by the input. Deterministic SE better preserves observation-coupled evidence, yet often retains residual noise or local distortion. We propose an evidence-grounded generative SE framework that uses a deterministic estimate as imperfect evidence. A Whisper-guided DPRNN produces an enhanced waveform, which is blended with the observation and tokenized into a discrete evidence sequence. The evidence conditions an autoregressive clean-speech token generator and is reused during decoding through Code-Space Grounding (CSG), which penalizes candidates according to their Hamming distance in the factorized finite-scalar-quantized (FSQ) space. Because the appropriate grounding strength depends on acoustic difficulty, we introduce SNR-Conditioned CSG (SNR-CSG), which maps a calibrated residual-SNR estimate to an utterance-level strength and constructs an adaptive grounded anchor. Although grounding improves content fidelity, the anchor may retain local acoustic defects inherited from the evidence. Since such defects are predominantly local in the FSQ space, nearby tokens may provide better acoustic realizations without large departures from the observation-supported trajectory. We therefore propose Grounded Neighborhood Refinement with LLM ranking (GNR-LLM). It performs one additional teacher-forced pass conditioned on the grounded-anchor history, intersects the LLM top-K candidates with a local FSQ Hamming neighborhood. Experiments on in-domain, controlled-SNR, and DNS no-reverb conditions show that SNR-CSG provides robust automatic grounding, while GNR-LLM substantially improves low-SNR perceptual quality without sacrificing content fidelity.
Hao Shi, Yuan Gao, Zhaoheng Ni +4
Kyoto University · Meta · Brno University of Technology +3