cs.LGApr 3, 2026

Communication-free Sampling and 4D Hybrid Parallelism for Scalable Mini-batch GNN Training

Authors: Cunyang Wei, Siddharth Singh, Aishwarya Sarkar, Daniel Nichols, Tisha Patel, Aditya K. Ranjan, Sayan Ghosh, Ali Jannesari, +2 more

Organizations: University of Maryland, College Park, USA · NVIDIA, Inc. · Iowa State University, USA · Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA · Google, Inc. · Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, USA

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for learning on graph datasets derived from various real-world scenarios. Learning from extremely large graphs requires distributed training, and mini-batching with sampling is a popular approach for parallelizing GNN training. Existing distributed mini-batch approaches have significant performance bottlenecks due to expensive sampling methods and limited scaling when using data parallelism. In this work, we present ScaleGNN, a 4D parallel framework for scalable mini-batch GNN training that combines communication-free distributed sampling, 3D parallel matrix multiplication (PMM), and data parallelism. ScaleGNN introduces a uniform vertex sampling algorithm, enabling each process (GPU device) to construct its local mini-batch, i.e., subgraph partitions without any inter-process communication. 3D PMM enables scaling mini-batch training to much larger GPU counts than vanilla data parallelism with significantly lower communication overheads. We also present additional optimizations to overlap sampling with training, reduce communication overhead by sending data in lower precision, kernel fusion, and communication-computation overlap. We evaluate ScaleGNN on five graph datasets and demonstrate strong scaling up to 2048 GPUs on Perlmutter, 2048 GCDs on Frontier, and 1024 GPUs on Tuolumne. On Perlmutter, ScaleGNN achieves 3.5x end-to-end training speedup over the SOTA baseline on ogbn-products.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 21, 2026

Implicit Regularization of Mini-Batch Training in Graph Neural Networks

Mini-batch training of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is fundamentally different from training on i.i.d. data: sampling a subgraph alters the topology and introduces boundary effects, leading prior work to develop structure-aware samplers that preserve local connectivity and reduce embedding variance. Surprisingly, we demonstrate that the simplest possible scheme, Random Node Sampling (RNS), training on the induced subgraph of uniformly sampled nodes, matches or outperforms full-graph training on 8 of 10 datasets at a fraction of the wall-clock time and memory. To explain this, we apply backward error analysis to graph mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and show that it implicitly minimizes the sampled loss plus a regularizer proportional to the mini-batch gradient variance, a quantity directly shaped by the sampler. Although RNS discards local structure, it produces mini-batches whose expected loss is closer to the full-graph loss, and whose per-batch gradients have lower variance, yielding a better implicit objective. Our analysis reframes the choice of graph sampler as a form of implicit regularization, and identifies RNS as a strong, theoretically grounded method for scalable GNN training.
May 29, 2026

On Efficient Scaling of GNNs via IO-Aware Layers Implementations

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are bottlenecked by sparse, irregular memory access. Popular frameworks such as DGL and PyTorch Geometric support general message passing, but complex layers often materialize edge-wise intermediates, increasing memory traffic and limiting scalability on large graphs. We take an I/O- and arithmetic-intensity--centric view and show that widely used layers fall into three kernel families: SpMM-based convolutions, reduction-based aggregations, and attention-based layers (GATv2/Graph Transformer). For each family, we develop GPU kernels that reduce data movement, improve locality, and remain robust across realistic graphs. We also study graph reordering and find that its impact depends on the kernel mapping: it benefits neighbor-parallel (gather-dominated) kernels more consistently than feature-parallel designs. Empirically, our fused attention kernels reach up to 3.9×\textbf{3.9}\times speedup for Graph Transformer (median 1.6×\textbf{1.6}\times), with Tensor Core (block-sparse) variants up to 7.3×\textbf{7.3}\times on locally dense graphs; for GATv2 we reach up to 8.5×\textbf{8.5}\times speedup (median 2.0×\textbf{2.0}\times) while reducing peak memory by up to 76×\textbf{76}\times (median 6×\textbf{6}\times). Our degree-aware reduction kernels achieve up to 10×\textbf{10}\times speedup (median 2.6×\textbf{2.6}\times). For SpMM-based layers, properly cached cuSPARSE achieves up to 8×\textbf{8}\times speedup over DGL and outperforms evaluated custom baselines in the majority of evaluations. We release our implementations as drop-in replacements to support reproducible, hardware-aware GNN acceleration.
Aug 7, 2026

LGNNIC: Acceleration of Large-Scale GNN Training using SmartNICs

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely used across domains such as natural sciences, social network analysis, chip design, and recommendation systems. However, as graph sizes grow, storing and processing them entirely on a single-node CPU-GPU system becomes increasingly impractical. A promising approach is to distribute the graph across multiple remote memory nodes, though this introduces a major bottleneck: inter-node network congestion during training. To address this, we propose LGNNIC, a novel inter-node system architecture that leverages SmartNICs co-located with remote memory nodes-a configuration already available in modern systems-to reduce communication overhead in distributed GNN training. LGNNIC offloads key preprocessing tasks to SmartNICs, reducing the volume of data transferred to computational (training) nodes and alleviating network congestion. We introduce two complementary techniques executed on the SmartNICs during the preprocessing phase: Neighbor Sampling, which performs mini-batch sampling, and Quantization of the sampled batches. To evaluate LGNNIC under different communication infrastructures, we designed both an optimized low-overhead DMA-based synchronization mechanism and a high-overhead socket-based alternative used as a benchmark. We evaluate the core SmartNIC offloading mechanisms across standard GNN workloads and sampling hyperparameters using a proof-of-concept (PoC) system comprising one remote-memory node with an NVIDIA BlueField-2 SmartNIC and one compute node with an A100 GPU. Both Neighbor Sampling and Quantization on the remote node demonstrated substantial training speedups in most configurations. Neighbor Sampling achieved up to 62.4x and 17.5x speedups with Sockets and DOCA-DMA, respectively, primarily due to reduced data transaction time. Quantization provided additional speedups of up to 3.6x and 1.3x, respectively, by reducing data transfer.