LLM-based Atomic Propositions help weak extractors: Evaluation of a Propositioner for triplet extraction
Organizations: STL · Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, LISN, 91400, Orsay, France · LISN · STL, AMIAD ·
Abstract
Knowledge Graph construction from natural language requires extracting structured triplets from complex, information-dense sentences. In this paper, we investigate if the decomposition of text into atomic propositions (minimal, semantically autonomous units of information) can improve the triplet extraction. We introduce MPropositionneur-V2, a small multilingual model covering six European languages trained by knowledge distillation from Qwen3-32B into a Qwen3-0.6B architecture, and we evaluate its integration into two extraction paradigms: entity-centric (GLiREL) and generative (Qwen3). Experiments on SMiLER, FewRel, DocRED and CaRB show that atomic propositions benefit weaker extractors (GLiREL, CoreNLP, 0.6B models), improving relation recall and, in the multilingual setting, overall accuracy. For stronger LLMs, a fallback combination strategy recovers entity recall losses while preserving the gains in relation extraction. These results show that atomic propositions are an interpretable intermediate data structure that complements extractors without replacing them.
Figures & tables
| GLiREL | Qwen3-0.6B | Qwen3-4B | ||||||||
| Benchmark | Pipeline | Acc | e-rec | r-rec | Acc | e-rec | r-rec | Acc | e-rec | r-rec |
| SMiLER | English – Direct | 49.8 | 99.0 | 50.3 | 35.7 | 100.0 | 35.7 | 71.4 | 100.0 | 71.4 |
| English – Prop | 43.7 | 86.6 | 50.4 | 35.1 | 86.6 | 40.5 | 59.6 | 86.6 | 68.8 | |
| English – Comb | 51.5 † | 99.1 | 51.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| French – Direct | 65.2 | 99.8 | 65.3 | 32.2 | 100.0 | 32.2 | 81.8 | 100.0 | 81.8 | |
| French – Prop | 48.9 | 76.7 | 63.8 | 39.7 | 76.7 | 51.7 | 64.6 | 76.7 | 84.3 | |
| GLiREL | Qwen3-0.6B | Qwen3-4B | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline | P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 | P | R | F1 |
| Sentence | 3.7 | 9.4 | 5.3 | 22.6 | 8.3 | 12.1 | 36.6 | 13.3 | 19.5 |
| Document | 1.4 | 14.8 | 2.5 | 20.3 | 15.7 | 17.7 | 32.0 | 24.4 | 27.7 |
| Proposition | 5.9 | 6.9 | 6.3 | 25.9 | 6.7 | 10.6 | 36.5 | 9.4 | 14.9 |
| Sentence+Proposition | 3.8 | 12.3 | 5.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Document+Proposition | 1.6 | 18.1 | 2.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| CoreNLP | Qwen3-0.6B | Qwen3-4B | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pipeline | P | R | F1 | AUC | P | R | F1 | AUC | P | R | F1 | AUC |
| Direct | 17.6 | 24.3 | 20.4 | 0.144 | 29.4 | 7.9 | 12.4 | 0.051 | 46.2 | 33.3 | 38.7 | 0.244 |
| Prop | 16.4 | 31.3 | 21.5 | 0.182 | 24.0 | 11.1 | 15.2 | 0.069 | 31.6 | 35.0 | 33.2 | 0.230 |
| Union | – | – | – | – | 23.7 | 14.7 | 18.1 | 0.091 | 30.8 | 43.6 | 36.1 | 0.285 |
KG Construction
Knowledge graph construction turns text, tables, images, and databases into structured entities and relationships that machines can query and reason over.
See all 195 papersGLiNER-Relex: A Unified Framework for Joint Named Entity Recognition and Relation Extraction
A Multi-granularity Interaction Network for Relational Triple Extraction
unseen'' entities, because these methods can't build contextual dependencies relevant unseen'' entities. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing a multi-granularity interaction network that leverages word-word, entity-relation, and head-tail interactions to capture deep semantic dependencies. By incorporating multiple iterations, the multi-granularity interaction network is effective to refine the representations corresponding to head and tail entities. It enhances the global semantic features associated with relational triples, aiding in the remediation of triples that may have been overlooked or omitted in earlier steps. Strong and consistent performance is achieved by our method on two rearranged datasets, with a significant improvement in identifying relational triples, including those involving ``unseen'' named entities. For example, our model improves F1-score by 3.1%/20.5% over previous approaches on the NYT-R/WebNLG-R datasets in the Unseen metric. Code: https://github.com/xiaocen-luo/Interaction-Network.