Robust deepfake detection in the wild remains challenging due to the ever-growing variety of manipulation techniques and uncontrolled real-world degradations. Forensic cues for deepfake detection reside at two complementary levels: global-level anomalies in semantics and statistics that require holistic image understanding, and local-level forgery traces concentrated in manipulated regions that are easily diluted by global averaging. Since no single backbone or input scale can effectively cover both levels, we propose LOGER, a LOcal--Global Ensemble framework for Robust deepfake detection. The global branch employs heterogeneous vision foundation model backbones at multiple resolutions to capture holistic anomalies with diverse visual priors. The local branch performs patch-level modeling with a Multiple Instance Learning top-k aggregation strategy that selectively pools only the most suspicious regions, mitigating evidence dilution caused by the dominance of normal patches; dual-level supervision at both the aggregated image level and individual patch level keeps local responses discriminative. Because the two branches differ in both granularity and backbone, their errors are largely decorrelated, a property that logit-space fusion exploits for more robust prediction. LOGER achieves 2nd place in the NTIRE 2026 Robust Deepfake Detection Challenge, and further evaluation on multiple public benchmarks confirms its strong robustness and generalization across diverse manipulation methods and real-world degradation conditions.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the proposed LOGER framework. Training data are sampled from a multi-source candidate pool with diverse degradation augmentation. The global branch performs full-image detection using DINOv3-H (M1, M2) and MetaCLIP2-H (M3) at multiple resolutions. The local branch employs DINOv3-L (M4, M5) with patch-level modeling and top-10% MIL pooling. All outputs are fused via logit-space averaging with test-time augmentation.
Method
AUC
Method
AUC
GPT-5.2
0.43
DDA [ 4 ]
0.49
Claude Sonnet 4.5
0.44
MIRROR [ 33 ]
0.59
Gemini 3 Pro
0.56
Effort [ 56 ]
0.65
CLIP-ViT-L [ 40 ]
0.66
Reality Defender [ 41 ]
0.70
Qwen3-VL-2B [ 1 ]
0.73
GenD [ 62 ]
0.74
ConvNeXt-L [ 34 ]
0.75
LOGER (Ours)
0.92
Table 4: Comparison with representative methods on the NTIRE 2026 validation set (image-level AUC).
Configuration
AUC
(a) DINOv3-H (Global)
Baseline (official data only)
0.5601
+ External data (ED)
0.7714
+ Focal Loss (FL)
0.7882
+ Degradation augmentation (DG)
0.8464
+ Flip TTA (M1)
0.8515
Table 5: Per-model ablation on the NTIRE 2026 competition validation set. Each group shows progressive training enhancements for one backbone.
Configuration
AUC
(a) Global branch
M1 (DINOv3-H, 256)
0.8674
M2 (DINOv3-H, 384)
0.8684
M3 (MetaCLIP2-H, 378)
0.8465
M1+M2+M3
0.8812
(b) Local branch
Table 6: Ablation study on ensemble composition and fusion strategy on the NTIRE 2026 public test set. All results are image-level AUC.
Method
ID
CM
CF
CD
Avg.
Small vision models
D 3 [ 61 ]
87.3
93.6
73.7
73.1
81.1
Effort [ 56 ]
94.7
82.8
88.0
67.1
82.2
Co-SPY [ 6 ]
86.3
93.5
87.3
74.7
84.7
MLLM-based detectors
SIDA-7B [ 22 ]
–
76.0
63.3
69.9
76.3
Table 7: Accuracy (%) on the HydraFake benchmark following the hierarchical evaluation protocol of Veritas [ 47 ] . All methods are trained on the HydraFake training set. ID: In-Domain, CM: Cross-Model, CF: Cross-Forgery, CD: Cross-Domain.
Figure 2: Robustness analysis under three degradation types: JPEG compression (left), spatial resizing (middle), and Gaussian blurring (right). AUC (%) is computed over 1,000 videos sampled from five cross-dataset benchmarks.
Figure 3: Representative failure cases on the NTIRE 2026 public test set. Top: false negatives (fake → real). Bottom: false positives (real → fake).
Robustness is a long-overlooked problem in deepfake detection. However, detection performance is nearly worthless in the real world if it suffers under exposure to even slight image degradation. In addition to weaker degradations that can accidentally occur in the image processing pipeline, there is another risk of malicious deepfakes that specifically introduce degradations, purposefully exploiting the detector's weaknesses in that regard. Here, we present an overview of the NTIRE 2026 Robust Deepfake Detection Challenge, which specifically addresses that problem. Participants were tasked with building a detector that would later be tested on an unknown test-set, which included both common and uncommon degradations of various strengths. With a total number of 337 participants and 57 submissions to the final leaderboard, the first edition of the challenge was well received. To ensure the reliability of the results, participants were given only 24h to complete the test run with no labels provided, limiting the possibility of training on the test data. Furthermore, the top solutions were scored on a private test-set to detect any such overfitting. This report presents the competition setting, dataset preparation, as well as details and performance of methods. Top methods rely on large foundation models, ensembles, and degradation training to combine generality and robustness.
Current deepfake detection models achieve state-of-the-art performance on pristine academic datasets but suffer severe spatial attention drift under real-world compound degradations, such as blurring and severe lossy compression. To address this vulnerability, we propose a foundation-driven forensic framework that integrates an extreme compound degradation engine with a structurally constrained, multi-stream architecture. During training, our degradation pipeline systematically destroys high-frequency artifacts, optimizing the DINOv2-Giant backbone to extract invariant geometric and semantic priors. We then process images through three specialized pathways: a Global Texture stream, a Localized Facial stream, and a Hybrid Semantic Fusion stream incorporating CLIP. Through analyzing spatial attribution via Score-CAM and feature stability using Cosine Similarity, we quantitatively demonstrate that these streams extract non-redundant, complementary feature representations and stabilize attention entropy. By aggregating these predictions via a calibrated, discretized voting mechanism, our ensemble successfully suppresses background attention drift while acting as a robust geometric anchor. Our approach yields highly stable zero-shot generalization, achieving Fourth Place in the NTIRE 2026 Robust Deepfake Detection Challenge at CVPR. Code is available at https://github.com/khoalephanminh/ntire26-deepfake-challenge.
Minh-Khoa Le-Phan, Minh-Hoang Le, Trong-Le Do +1
University of Science, VNU-HCM, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam · Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can explain deepfake verdicts in natural language, but such explanations are not necessarily visually grounded in the visual evidence underlying the prediction. A model may describe plausible artifacts inferred from language priors rather than from image evidence. Existing grounding methods improve visual reliance through decoding or attention interventions, but they generally strengthen grounding over the entire image, making them ill-suited for forensic artifacts that are subtle, spatially localized, and image-dependent. We propose Look Before You Judge, a training-free framework that formulates explainable deepfake detection as a sequential evidence acquisition process. Instead of directly predicting image authenticity from holistic visual reasoning, our framework first identifies image-specific candidate evidence regions by contrasting the MLLM's decoder-to-visual attention between an original image and its Gaussian-blurred counterpart. The identified regions are then inspected individually, and the resulting local evidence is integrated with the global image context before reaching a final verdict. The framework operates without manipulation masks, external forensic models, or parameter updates, making it directly applicable to off-the-shelf MLLMs. Across five open-source MLLMs on TriDF and MMTD-Set, our framework improves detection accuracy by up to 12.8%, reduces CHAIR by up to 33.4% and hallucination rate by up to 21.3%, and outperforms representative training-free decoding and attention methods.
Chia-Ling Chen, Yu-Ting Ta, Jian-Yu Jiang-Lin +8
National Taiwan University · National Tsing Hua University · National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University