A Generative Foundation Model for Multimodal Histopathology

Computational pathology has made significant progress in recent years, fueling advances in both fundamental disease understanding and clinically ready tools. This evolution is driven by the availability of large amounts of digitized slides and specialized deep learning methods and models. Multiple self-supervised foundation feature extractors have been developed, enabling downstream predictive applications from cell segmentation to tumor sub-typing and survival analysis. In contrast, generative foundation models designed specifically for histopathology remain scarce. Such models could address tasks that are beyond the capabilities of feature extractors, such as virtual staining. In this paper, we introduce CytoSyn, a state-of-the-art foundation latent diffusion model that enables the guided generation of highly realistic and diverse histopathology H&E-stained images, as shown in an extensive benchmark. We explored methodological improvements, training set scaling, sampling strategies and slide-level overfitting, culminating in the improved CytoSyn-v2, and compared our work to PixCell, a state-of-the-art model, in an in-depth manner. This comparison highlighted the strong sensitivity of both diffusion models and performance metrics to preprocessing-specific details such as JPEG compression. Our model has been trained on a dataset obtained from more than 10,000 TCGA diagnostic whole-slide images of 32 different cancer types. Despite being trained only on oncology slides, it maintains state-of-the-art performance generating inflammatory bowel disease images. To support the research community, we publicly release CytoSyn's weights, its training and validation datasets, and a sample of synthetic images in this repository: https://huggingface.co/Owkin-Bioptimus/CytoSyn.

State-of-the-art pathology foundation models, trained on millions of histology tiles, can fail to preserve tissue similarity when comparisons cross slide or institution boundaries. We show that general-purpose multimodal LLMs, without being trained as pathology foundation models, consistently outperform these specialized models in cross-domain histological similarity judgments. Using a relative similarity framework that we release as the MOSAIC (Model Similarity Assessment across Institutions and Cohorts) benchmark, we evaluate 17 models across 6 datasets and find that pathology encoders often rank same-institution, different-disease tiles as more similar than same-disease, different-institution tiles, a clinically dangerous failure mode invisible to standard within-domain evaluations. LLMs appear less susceptible to this failure, likely because they perform semantic visual comparison of morphology and tissue architecture rather than relying on shortcut features tied to acquisition context. Scaling training data does not resolve the problem for pathology encoders, implicating the learning objective rather than data coverage. Our results expose a fundamental robustness gap in current pathology foundation models and establish multimodal LLMs as a viable alternative for cross-institutional retrieval, dataset harmonization, and multi-site quality control. Code and data will be released upon acceptance.

Synthetic histopathology image generation has emerged as an approach that may address data scarcity in computational pathology, yet current evaluation methodologies may not fully assess synthetic data quality for medical applications. This work investigates and addresses limitations in existing evaluation metrics, investigating an approach for assessing synthetic histopathology image quality through domain-specific metrics and downstream task validation. We show that conventional synthetic data evaluation metrics such as Frechet Inception Distance (FID) and Inception Score (IS) may have limitations when applied to histopathology images due to their reliance on ImageNet-pretrained feature extractors. To address these limitations, we propose for consideration modified FID and IS approaches utilizing foundation models pretrained on digital pathology datasets, supplemented by precision-recall based metrics as part of an additional quality assessment. Using conditional denoising diffusion models trained on four benchmark datasets, with a two-step training approach, we generated synthetic datasets with systematically varied quality characteristics. We also measured the correlation between the synthetic data quality metrics with downstream nuclei segmentation performance using common metrics including the aggregated Jaccard index (AJI+) and the Dice coefficient. The study results suggest that pathology-specific metrics may provide improved discriminative power. Specifically, the modified Inception Score indicates higher correlation with downstream task performance (r=0.6096 with AJI+, p=0.0122), compared to the original IS (r=0.0708, p=0.7944). Our observations indicate that increasing the variety of generated training data has a higher positive correlation with segmentation model performance than improving the visual fidelity of individual generated images.