Tensor-valued data arise naturally in multidimensional signal and imaging problems, such as biomedical imaging. When incorporated into generalized linear models (GLMs), naive vectorization can destroy their multi-way structure and lead to high-dimensional, ill-posed estimation. To address this challenge, Low Separation Rank (LSR) decompositions reduce model complexity by imposing low-rank multilinear structure on the coefficient tensor. A representative approach for estimating LSR-based tensor GLMs (LSR-TGLMs) is the Low Separation Rank Tensor Regression (LSRTR) algorithm, which adopts block coordinate descent and enforces orthogonality of the factor matrices through repeated QR-based projections. However, the repeated projection steps can be computationally demanding and slow convergence. Motivated by the need for scalable estimation and classification from such data, we propose LSRTR-M, which incorporates Muon (MomentUm Orthogonalized by Newton-Schulz) updates into the LSRTR framework. Specifically, LSRTR-M preserves the original block coordinate scheme while replacing the projection-based factor updates with Muon steps. Across synthetic linear, logistic, and Poisson LSR-TGLMs, LSRTR-M converges faster in both iteration count and wall-clock time, while achieving lower normalized estimation and prediction errors. On the Vessel MNIST 3D task, it further improves computational efficiency while maintaining competitive classification performance.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: A third-order tensor under the LSR decomposition.
Figure 2: Performance comparison in linear regression. Top row: results versus iterations. Bottom row: results versus running time. Columns correspond to training loss, normalized estimation error, and normalized prediction error, respectively.
Figure 3: Performance comparison across training sample sizes in linear regression. (a) Normalized estimation error and (b) normalized prediction error.
Figure 4: Performance comparison in logistic regression. Top row: results versus iterations. Bottom row: results versus running time. Columns correspond to training loss, normalized estimation error, and normalized prediction error, respectively.
Figure 5: Performance comparison across training sample sizes in logistic regression. (a) Normalized estimation error and (b) normalized prediction error.
Figure 6: Performance comparison in Poisson regression. Top row: results versus iterations. Bottom row: results versus running time. Columns correspond to training loss, normalized estimation error, and normalized prediction error, respectively.
Figure 7: Performance and convergence comparison across training sample sizes in Poisson regression. (a) Normalized estimation error, (b) normalized squared logarithmic prediction error, and (c) convergence success rate ( % of converged trials).
Figure 8: Representative 28×28×28 vessel volumes from the Vessel MNIST 3D dataset. Top row: aneurysm samples ( y=1 ). Bottom row: healthy samples ( y=0 ).
Figure 9: Test error versus number of iterations on the Vessel MNIST 3D dataset under two train-test settings: the original (unbalanced) split (left) and the balanced subsampling setting (right). The dashed vertical lines mark the early-stopping iteration for each method.
Metric
LSRTR
LSRTR-M
Sensitivity
0.2744
0.3395
Specificity
0.8407
0.8493
F1 Score
0.2168
0.2681
AUC
0.5379
0.6232
Accuracy
0.7770
0.7919
Running time (s)
23.47
12.53
Table 1: Performance comparison on the Vessel MNIST 3D dataset under the original (unbalanced) split. Metrics are evaluated at the early-stopping iteration of each method.
Metric
LSRTR
LSRTR-M
Sensitivity
0.7326
0.7558
Specificity
0.6581
0.6651
F1 Score
0.7059
0.7222
AUC
0.7540
0.7655
Accuracy
0.6953
0.7105
Running time (s)
8.27
3.68
Table 2: Performance comparison on the Vessel MNIST 3D dataset under the balanced split. Metrics are evaluated at the early-stopping iteration of each method.
Generalized linear models connect predictors to non-Gaussian outcomes through a link function, supporting interpretable prediction and statistical inference.
Tensor Train (TT) decomposition is a powerful technique for analyzing high-dimensional data. Existing algorithms for computing TT decompositions can be categorized into two main types: conventional batch-based approaches and recursive online methods. In the context of streaming data, batch methods typically achieve higher reconstruction accuracy but often suffer from memory exhaustion, while online methods provide greater computational efficiency. In this work, we introduce Online TT-ALS (Alternating Least Squares), an algorithm that sequentially enforces orthogonality constraints. This approach allows for efficient and exact updates of the core tensor while maintaining high reconstruction accuracy. Theoretically, we prove that enforcing these orthogonal gauge constraints guarantees monotonic decrease of the local objective function and temporal smoothness. Computationally, our deterministic single-sweep update reduces the rank dependence from quadratic to linear, achieving an overall complexity of O(In−1r). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms existing online techniques not only in terms of mathematical approximation accuracy but also in human perception-based video quality metrics. Furthermore, compared to recent deep learning-based paradigms, our algebraic approach achieves speedups of several orders of magnitude. Consequently, our method exhibits high computational efficiency and is suitable for low-latency real-time processing applications.
Hiroki Takeda, Yuto Miyatake, Daisuke Furihata
Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, The University of Osaka, Japan · D3 Center, The University of Osaka, Japan
We consider the recovery of low-multilinear-rank tensors from linear measurements and propose an adaptive block-weighted modewise Riemannian gradient descent method. The method combines memory-efficient modewise measurements with a normalized adaptive weighting strategy for the core and factor components of the Riemannian gradient. The weighting improves convergence without increasing the multilinear-rank bound of the search direction or the size of the reduced core used for retraction. Under the tensor restricted isometry property and a suitable initialization, we establish local linear convergence and derive sampling guarantees for sub-Gaussian and subsampled orthogonal with random sign (SORS) measurements. Numerical experiments on synthetic low-Tucker-rank tensors show that the proposed method reduces iteration counts and computational time while maintaining reliable recovery performance, especially near the recovery threshold and for structured SORS measurements.
Yushi Zhou, Feng Zhang
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Matrix-valued time series arise in a wide range of applications, such as spatio-temporal data from medical imaging and geophysics. Existing methods are mainly designed for static settings and lack adaptability to streaming and time-varying environments. Adaptive filtering techniques have also been largely limited to data with scalar or vector values, leaving adaptive forecasting for matrix-valued time series inadequately understood. To bridge these gaps, we develop an adaptive tensor regression framework that includes Matrix-on-Matrix (MoM) and Tensor-on-Matrix (ToM) formulations for streaming matrix-valued prediction. The two formulations differ in whether to directly model matrix-valued outputs or to exploit temporal structure via higher-order tensor representations. For the proposed tensor regression framework, we develop stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms for online learning. We show that stacking multiple responses across time into higher-order tensors improves performance; in particular, the ToM achieves lower steady-state error and stronger denoising capability than MoM, motivating our focus on the ToM model. We further characterize the tracking behavior of SGD under time-varying dynamics. From a statistical perspective, we establish fixed-time recovery guarantees for ToM under general low-dimensional structures, including sparsity, low-rankness, and their joint sparselow-rank models.
Zhen Qin, Yang Chen
Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering, Department of Statistics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA · Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA