MIRAGE: Benchmarking and Aligning Multi-Instance Image Editing

Editing multiple elements of an image in a single forward pass is a practical alternative to multi-turn image manipulation, offering improved efficiency and potentially better harmonization. However, when several instructions target different regions, semantic interference often leads to attribute leakage and poor edit disentanglement, especially as the number of edits increases. In this work, we propose MICE (Multi-Instance Concurrent Editing), a training-free strategy for scalable multi-instance image editing with Multimodal Diffusion Transformers. MICE modifies the additive bias of joint attention to regulate interactions between instance-specific edit instructions, latent, and context tokens identified via user-provided segmentation masks. Specifically, MICE allows intra-instance attention, penalizes interactions between neighboring region tokens, and suppresses unrelated cross-instance attention. As a result, our method enforces attribute binding while preserving global visual consistency. We evaluate MICE on LoMOE-Bench and introduce MICE-Bench, a more challenging benchmark with an average of 8.5 concurrent edits per image. The experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms strong baselines and recent competitors in terms of visual quality preservation and faithfulness to the editing instructions.

Reference-guided instance editing is fundamentally limited by semantic entanglement, where a reference's intrinsic appearance is intertwined with its extrinsic attributes. The key challenge lies in disentangling what information should be borrowed from the reference, and determining how to apply it appropriately to the target. To tackle this challenge, we propose GENIE, a Generalizable Instance Editing framework capable of achieving explicit disentanglement. GENIE first corrects spatial misalignments with a Spatial Alignment Module (SAM). Then, an Adaptive Residual Scaling Module (ARSM) learns what to borrow by amplifying salient intrinsic cues while suppressing extrinsic attributes, while a Progressive Attention Fusion (PAF) mechanism learns how to render this appearance onto the target, preserving its structure. Extensive experiments on the challenging AnyInsertion dataset demonstrate that GENIE achieves state-of-the-art fidelity and robustness, setting a new standard for disentanglement-based instance editing.

High-quality source-target image pairs with precise editing instructions are essential for instruction-guided image editing, yet constructing such training triplets at scale remains costly. Recent pipelines often rely on vision-language models to synthesize editing instructions automatically, but we find that strong VLMs still struggle to describe visual transformations between image pairs. In particular, they exhibit three recurring failure modes: orientation inconsistency, viewpoint ambiguity, and missing fine-grained attributes. In a human evaluation on 400 image pairs, several open-source VLM baselines produce critical-error rates above 47%, making many synthesized instructions unsuitable for downstream training. To address this, we propose EditCaption, a two-stage post-training pipeline for image editing instruction synthesis. First, we construct a 100K supervised fine-tuning dataset through GLM-based auto-captioning, EditScore filtering, and human refinement. Second, we collect 10K human-annotated preference pairs, where each rejected instruction is labeled with its primary error type and severity. Based on this dataset, we propose Hardness-Adaptive Error-Aware DPO (HAE-DPO), a task-adapted DPO objective that introduces an adaptive margin based on human-labeled severity, failure-mode type, and reference-model hardness. Experiments across three benchmarks demonstrate that our 235B model with SFT+HAE-DPO achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source and closed models, scoring 4.720 on Eval-400, 4.672 on HQ-Edit, and 4.651 on ByteMorph-Bench -- surpassing Gemini-3-Pro on all three. Human evaluation confirms critical error rates drop from 47.75% to 17.50%, with correct rates improving from 41.75% to 70.25%, surpassing Gemini-3-Pro (66.00%).