cs.CVApr 6, 2026

Integration of Object Detection and Small VLMs for Construction Safety Hazard Identification

Authors: Muhammad Adil, Mehmood Ahmed, Muhammad Aqib, Vicente A. Gonzalez, Gaang Lee, Qipei Mei

Organizations: Infrastructure Human Tech (IHT) Lab, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Read PDF
Ask AI
Cite

Copy citation

DOINot available for this paper

Abstract

Accurate and timely identification of construction hazards around workers is essential for preventing workplace accidents. While large vision-language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong contextual reasoning capabilities, their high computational requirements limit their applicability in near real-time construction hazard detection. In contrast, small vision-language models (sVLMs) with fewer than 4 billion parameters offer improved efficiency but often suffer from reduced accuracy and hallucination when analyzing complex construction scenes. To address this trade-off, this study proposes a detection-guided sVLM framework that integrates object detection with multimodal reasoning for contextual hazard identification. The framework first employs a YOLOv11n detector to localize workers and construction machinery within the scene. The detected entities are then embedded into structured prompts to guide the reasoning process of sVLMs, enabling spatially grounded hazard assessment. Within this framework, six sVLMs (Gemma-3 4B, Qwen-3-VL 2B/4B, InternVL-3 1B/2B, and SmolVLM-2B) were evaluated in zero-shot settings on a curated dataset of construction site images with hazard annotations and explanatory rationales. The proposed approach consistently improved hazard detection performance across all models. The best-performing model, Gemma-3 4B, achieved an F1-score of 50.6%, compared to 34.5% in the baseline configuration. Explanation quality also improved significantly, with BERTScore F1 increasing from 0.61 to 0.82. Despite incorporating object detection, the framework introduces minimal overhead, adding only 2.5 ms per image during inference. These results demonstrate that integrating lightweight object detection with small VLM reasoning provides an effective and efficient solution for context-aware construction safety hazard detection.

More in this topic

Construction Safety

See all 13 papers

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 7, 2026

AVA-VLM: Adaptive Visual Attention-Vision Language Model for In-the-Wild Construction Site Monitoring

Existing construction-site Vision-Language Model (VLM) studies have primarily adapted pretrained VLMs through direct QA-style fine-tuning from a single global image, but we argue that this paradigm remains limited in operational range, reliability under reduced-resolution inputs, and inference efficiency. To address these limitations, we propose AVA-VLM, an Adaptive Visual Attention-Vision Language Model that follows a human-inspired coarse-to-fine strategy: it first reasons over a low-resolution global image and requests a high-resolution local crop only when detailed inspection is needed. We further introduce a region-aware Chain-of-Thought dataset that teaches when to inspect, where to crop, and how to use local evidence. Experiments show that, for violation identification, AVA-VLM improves overall F1 from 62.0 to 75.1 while using only 30.6% of the baseline visual-token budget; for long-distance PPE-violation cases, F1 improves from 16.0 to 63.6. These results demonstrate AVA-VLM's improved robustness to distant and reduced-resolution visual evidence with substantially lower visual-token usage.

Younggun Kim, Taeheon Kim, Youngseo Kim +1

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, 90095, CA, USA · AI+KCIR Global Resilience Research Center, Suwon, 16419, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea · SmartInside AI Co., Ltd., Suwon, 16419, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea +1

VLM RobustnessEfficient VLM InferenceLarge Vision-Language Models
AskPDF
May 19, 2026

Passive Construction Site Safety Monitoring via Persona-Scaffolded Adversarial Chain-of-Thought VLM Verification

Construction remains the deadliest industry sector in the United States, with 1,055 fatal worker injuries recorded in 2023, and the majority preventable. Existing monitoring approaches are expensive, require real-time human operators, or address only a narrow subset of violations. This paper presents a passive, end-of-shift construction safety monitoring pipeline processing video from POV body-worn and fixed wall-mounted cameras through a three-stage architecture: (1) fine-tuned YOLO11 for primary PPE and hazard detection, (2) SAM 3 for segmentation refinement and worker deduplication, and (3) Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct with a method-prompted, persona-scaffolded three-pass adversarial chain-of-thought protocol for compliance verification and hallucination control. The principal contribution is the Stage 3 prompt design: professional persona backstories following the method-actor framing drive an observed 12% precision improvement over single-pass prompting in an informal three-author review of the 12-video Ironsite development corpus, with the largest gains on hallucination-prone violation categories. Structural message isolation enforces observational independence between a generator, discriminator, and reconciliation pass governed by asymmetric rules encoding priors about human observation versus automated detection reliability. The system maps violations to OSHA standards, performs REBA-inspired ergonomic risk scoring from pose keypoints, and produces per-worker safety reports with timestamped evidence. An evaluation harness is released for future reproduction.

Ananth Sriram, Neel Mokaria, Rajveer Singh

Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

CoT ReasoningVideo SurveillanceConstruction Safety
AskPDF
Jul 18, 2026

Hazard or Anomaly? Evaluating VLMs for Understanding Dangers and Discrepancies

Modern safety-critical systems increasingly rely on human-robot interaction to reduce disaster risk and support decision-making during emergencies. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are promising for these settings because they can interpret complex scenes and communicate safety-relevant information, but they still require careful evaluation to ensure reliable safety reasoning. In particular, current evaluations often frame danger recognition as a binary decision (Safe/Unsafe), making it unclear whether a model is identifying true physical hazards or merely reacting to unusual scene elements. We address this limitation by introducing an explicit distinction between hazard and anomaly, and by separately recognizing hazardous and anomalous states. We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs across two datasets and multiple prompting strategies to test whether this distinction changes model behavior. Our results show that VLMs frequently misinterpret anomalousness as hazardousness, revealing an over-reliance on contextual irregularity as a proxy for danger. We further show that explicitly separating anomaly from hazard provides a more informative evaluation of VLM safety reasoning and exposes failure modes that binary safety judgments can obscure. Our public dataset is available on Roboflow https://app.roboflow.com/vlm-in-context-anomaly-and-hazard-detection/camera-ready-roman-ds.

Murali Indukuri, Mohammad Eskandari, Sree Nitya Kollu +2

Interactive Robotics and Language Lab, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Department, Baltimore, MD, USA. · DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD, USA.

VLM Evaluation
AskPDF