Physics-Aware Video Instance Removal Benchmark
Organizations: Tohoku University · University of Washington · Texas A&M University
Abstract
Video Instance Removal (VIR) requires removing target objects while maintaining background integrity and physical consistency, such as specular reflections and illumination interactions. Despite advancements in text-guided editing, current benchmarks primarily assess visual plausibility, often overlooking the physical causalities, such as lingering shadows, triggered by object removal. We introduce the Physics-Aware Video Instance Removal (PVIR) benchmark, featuring 95 high-quality videos annotated with instance-accurate masks and removal prompts. PVIR is partitioned into Simple and Hard subsets, the latter explicitly targeting complex physical interactions. We evaluate four representative methods, PISCO-Removal, UniVideo, DiffuEraser, and CoCoCo, using a decoupled human evaluation protocol across three dimensions to isolate semantic, visual, and spatial failures: instruction following, rendering quality, and edit exclusivity. Our results show that PISCO-Removal and UniVideo achieve state-of-the-art performance, while DiffuEraser frequently introduces blurring artifacts and CoCoCo struggles significantly with instruction following. The persistent performance drop on the Hard subset highlights the ongoing challenge of recovering complex physical side effects.
Figures & tables
| Subset | #Videos | Avg. Frames | Key Properties |
| Simple | 57 | 81 | weaker interaction and simpler geometry |
| Hard | 38 | 81 | reflection/mirror/specular and stronger coupling |
| Total | 95 | 81 | mixed scenes and motions |
| Score | Instruction Following | Rendering Quality | Edit Exclusivity |
| Score 1 | Target not removed or unrelated edit | Severe artifacts; unusable output | Uncontrolled edits across scene |
| Score 2 | Partial removal with obvious residual traces | Obvious distortion/flicker; poor temporal consistency | Multiple non-target regions altered |
| Score 3 | Target mostly removed with minor artifacts | Moderate quality degradation but viewable result | Minor non-target changes but structure mostly preserved |
| Score 4 | Target precisely removed with no obvious residuals | High visual quality and stable temporal consistency | Non-target regions preserved with only negligible differences |
| Subset | Method | Instruction Following | Rendering Quality | Edit Exclusivity | Overall |
| Overall | CoCoCo | 1.60 | 1.84 | 3.07 | 2.17 |
| UniVideo | 3.06 | 3.45 | 3.53 | 3.35 | |
| DiffuEraser | 2.89 | 2.63 | 3.52 | 3.01 | |
| PISCO-Removal | 3.62 | 3.28 | 3.58 | 3.49 | |
| Simple | CoCoCo | 1.75 | 1.98 | 3.33 | 2.35 |
| UniVideo | 3.21 | 3.34 | 3.53 | 3.36 |
Video Editing
Video editing uses AI to alter, compose, relight, or reorganize moving footage while controlling how changes persist across frames.
See all 178 papers