Limits of Difficulty Scaling: Hard Samples Yield Diminishing Returns in GRPO-Tuned SLMs

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has emerged as a memory-efficient reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) technique for reasoning-intensive tasks. How- ever, GRPO training dynamics on small language models (SLMs) remain poorly understood, limiting its reliable adoption and reproducibility in open and resource- constrained environments. In this work, we present a systematic study of GRPO fine-tuning for SLMs ranging from 1.5B to 7B parameters under a practical single- node 8xA100 compute budget. Our study spans multiple model families and reasoning domains, including mathematics, coding, and multiple-choice question answering (MCQ) in science. Across these settings, we analyze how group size affects policy convergence, training stability, and downstream benchmark per- formance. We further characterize tensor-level update dynamics during GRPO training and investigate whether the choice of LoRA target modules and layers can improve the performance of GRPO-tuned models. While our initial GRPO-tuned models outperform their base counterparts on approximately 80% of mathematical benchmark evaluations, they demonstrate limited capability on MCQ and code reasoning tasks. Guided by our mechanistic evaluations, we refined our LoRA and reward-shaping configurations to improve performance in latter domains. These findings provide practical guidance for GRPO training for SLMs.

RL with verifiable rewards can substantially improve LLM reasoning, yet standard GRPO-style training often treats easy, hard, and learnable questions alike through uniform sampling and weighting, leading to inefficient compute allocation. We study GRPO by tracking token log-probabilities, group-normalized advantages, and the induced token-level update weights. This reveals three recurring dynamics as training proceeds: (1) confidence inflation, (2) advantage contraction, and (3) hierarchical convergence. These findings suggest that the utility of each update depends strongly on both question difficulty and the model's current competence. Motivated by this, we propose Confidence and Difficulty-adaptive Policy Optimization (CoDaPO), which assigns each question a bounded value from rollout confidence and empirical difficulty. CoDaPO then uses this value to reweight policy updates and resample high-value learnable questions within mini-batches, thereby increasing discovery within the learnable band under a fixed compute budget. Across twelve benchmarks, CoDaPO consistently improves accuracy over existing RL methods. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/tmlr-group/CoDaPO.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves reasoning in large language models. Yet, typical RLVR approaches fail on difficult problems: when a model cannot generate any correct solutions, it receives zero learning signal. Providing privileged guidance during training, such as solution prefixes, can help overcome this learning cliff by steering the model towards {correct solutions with non-zero reward}. {We call these rollouts off-context: they are generated from a training prompt that contains privileged guidance, while the target objective is defined by the original prompt without that guidance.} {We introduce} Off-Context GRPO (OC-GRPO), a minimally modified variant of GRPO that uses guided rollouts but applies an importance-corrected objective to steer the update back toward the original unguided objective, avoiding the mismatch that destabilizes uncorrected guided training. Empirically, our algorithm achieves a 3.9% absolute improvement (13.8% relative gain) over vanilla GRPO on average across standard mathematical reasoning benchmarks with negligible additional cost.