CBM-Dual: A 65-nm Fully Connected Chaotic Boltzmann Machine Processor for Dual Function Simulated Annealing and Reservoir Computing

Hardware accelerators based on physical dynamical systems offer an attractive route toward energy-efficient reinforcement learning applications. However, their scalability is challenging because it requires many statistically independent entropy sources. Here, we introduce a quasi-analog decision-making architecture based on asynchronous Boolean networks (or lattices) implemented on a clockless reconfigurable chip. Each node in the network consists of a single logic element that acts as an autonomous entropy source. This architecture gives rise to distributed Boolean chaos, in which a spatially coupled network generates parallel streams of chaotic Boolean transitions with very low statistical dependence between nodes. We experimentally demonstrate parallel decision-making on a 1024-armed bandit problem, which is beyond the scale of previous hardware implementations, while significantly improving power-law scaling performance. Separately, we scale the proposed entropy source to 5120 parallel channels, yielding an aggregate sample generation rate of 2.14 TS/s. Our solution is implemented on a commercial reconfigurable CMOS chip and offers high integration density and ease of programmability. Our results pave the way for using distributed Boolean chaos as a valuable hardware substrate for large-scale reinforcement learning and for the development of fully integrated, high-throughput decision-making accelerators.

Analog content-addressable memories (aCAMs) based on memristors provide a promising pathway toward energy-efficient large-scale associative computing for Edge AI and embedded intelligence applications. They have been successfully applied to decision-tree inference and extend the capabilities of compute-in-memory (CIM) architectures beyond conventional vector-matrix multiplication. However, conventional designs such as the 6T2M architecture suffer from static search power, limited voltage gain, and pronounced match-line crosstalk, constraining analog precision and scalability. We introduce a strong-arm latched memristor (SALM) aCAM cell that replaces static voltage division with a dynamic current-race comparator, enabling high regenerative gain, intrinsic result latching, and near-zero static search power. Compared to 6T2M, SALM reduces read energy by 33% at identical latency while eliminating the gain and crosstalk limitations that prevent 6T2M from scaling to large arrays. SALM further enables scalable sequential and parallel latch sharing, and a dataset-aware optimization framework exposes an explicit energy-latency tradeoff, achieving up to 50% energy reduction at 3x latency across representative workloads. To enable architectural exploration, we develop a circuit-accurate behavioral model derived from SPICE lookup tables in 22 nm FD-SOI technology, capturing match-line dynamics and crosstalk. Integrated into the X-TIME decision-tree compiler, this framework demonstrates that SALM maintains near-software accuracy for high-dimensional datasets, whereas baseline designs degrade due to limited gain and cumulative crosstalk.

Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) speeds up neural-network inference by doing the arithmetic directly inside a memory array, instead of shuttling weights back and forth between memory and a processor. This saves energy, but the physical devices that store the weights are imperfect: programming errors, electrical noise, limited-resolution converters, and outright broken cells all distort the computation, and every physical chip is distorted in its own way. A designer with several such chips available faces an uncomfortable choice: run all of them and combine the answers (safe, but wasteful of energy), or trust a single chip blindly (cheap, but with no guarantee on how often it is wrong). This paper introduces RACE-AIMC (Risk-Aware Certified Ensemble for AIMC), a framework that resolves this choice with statistics rather than guesswork. Offline, RACE-AIMC studies a pool of physical accelerators, picks the single best one for a given energy budget, and computes a mathematically exact upper bound on how often that accelerator will be wrong when it chooses to answer. Online, only that one accelerator is switched on; a lightweight check decides whether to accept its answer or defer to a fallback. In our simulations using a noisy weight mapping and multiple independent test runs, every certified bound stayed under a 10% error target (mean bound 7.83% +- 0.89%, with 70.88% +- 0.98% of inputs answered directly). The resulting system matches the accuracy of a clean digital baseline while cutting modeled energy use by 69.02% relative to always running every accelerator in the pool.