Information as Structural Alignment: A Dynamical Theory of Continual Learning
Organizations: The Informational Buildup Foundation
Abstract
Catastrophic forgetting is not an engineering failure. It is a mathematical consequence of storing knowledge as global parameter superposition. Existing methods, such as regularization, replay, and frozen subnetworks, add external mechanisms to a shared-parameter substrate. None derives retention from the learning dynamics themselves. This paper introduces the Informational Buildup Framework (IBF), an alternative substrate for continual learning, based on the premise that information is the achievement of structural alignment rather than stored content. In IBF, two equations govern the dynamics: a Law of Motion that drives configuration toward higher coherence, and Modification Dynamics that persistently deform the coherence landscape in response to localized discrepancies. Memory, agency, and self-correction arise from these dynamics rather than being added as separate modules. We first demonstrate the full lifecycle in a transparent two-dimensional toy model, then validate across three domains: a controlled non-stationary world, chess evaluated independently by Stockfish, and Split-CIFAR-100 with a frozen ViT encoder. Across all three, IBF achieves replay-superior retention without storing raw data. We observe near-zero forgetting on CIFAR-100 (BT = -0.004), positive backward transfer in chess (+38.5 cp), and 43% less forgetting than replay in the controlled domain. In chess, the framework achieves a mean behavioral advantage of +88.9 +/- 2.8 cp under independent evaluation, exceeding MLP and replay baselines.
Figures & tables
| Condition | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Full IBF | |||
| No-Agency | |||
| No-Crystallization | |||
| No-Crucible | |||
| MLP | |||
| Replay MLP |
| Agent | Mean cp | vs. Passive |
|---|---|---|
| Full IBF ( ) | ||
| No-Agency ( ) | ||
| MLP | ||
| Replay | ||
| Passive |
| Method | Task-IL Avg | BT | Class-IL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full IBF | |||
| Replay MLP | |||
| EWC | |||
| MLP | |||
| Coherence head | — |
| Primitive | Symbol | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| Field | A nonempty universal set whose elements are informational patterns; the total space of possible informational configurations. | |
| Pattern | An element of the Field. Patterns possess no intrinsic meaning or stability independent of their relations to systems and scales. | |
| Closed Informational System (CIS) | A connected region of configuration space where coherence exceeds a viability threshold and boundary gradients point inward, actively resisting dissolution. | |
| Observational Scale | A resolution parameter specifying the level of abstraction at which patterns and systems are distinguished. Determines which distinctions are operational and which coherence function applies. | |
| Configuration Space | For each system at scale , the differentiable manifold of all admissible internal states. Every point represents a possible internal configuration. | |
| Coherence | A scalar function quantifying the degree of structural alignment between a system’s internal configuration and its environment. Relational, fragile, non-reducible. |
| Ref. | Name | Statement / Role | Scope |
| Axioms (Existence and Motion) | |||
| I | The Field | ; for each , the Field admits an associated differentiable configuration space . | Here |
| II | Coherence | ; relational, fragile, and non-decomposable. Defines viability and CIS boundaries. | Here |
| III | Informational Gravity | ; systems experience a pull toward higher structural alignment. | Here |
| IV | Law of Motion | ; motion follows the effective coherence gradient, modulated by responsiveness. | Here |
| Closure Postulates | |||
| Theoretical Construct | Engine Realization | Local Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Axioms (Existence and Motion) | ||
| Field (Axiom I) | Domain observation space together with the frozen encoder and induced latent configuration space | The engine always operates on admissible latent configurations |
| Coherence (Axiom II) | Frozen baseline evaluator plus effective correction field | Effective coherence landscape |
| Informational Gravity (Axiom III) | Discrete coherence increments over candidate next states, | Local directional preference toward higher alignment |
| Law of Motion (Axiom IV) | Boltzmann action selection with responsiveness over candidate next states | Probabilistic ascent on the effective coherence landscape |
| Modification Postulate | ||
| Symbol | Definition | Engine Realization | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Latent Configuration and Evaluation | |||
| Current latent configuration | Frozen encoder output | The engine operates only in latent space | |
| Candidate next latent state | Latent image of action | Used for discrete motion / action selection | |
| Baseline coherence evaluator | Frozen domain-specific baseline | No backpropagation through engine state | |
| Coherence-correction field | Kernel readout from coherence particles | Additive modification of the baseline evaluator | |
| Effective coherence | Read path output for motion | ||
| Symbol | Definition | Engine Realization | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Read Path | |||
| Localization kernel | Gaussian RBF | Shared by read and write paths | |
| Read-gating variable | Same-context or verified cross-context read access | ||
| Responsiveness correction field | Intensive readout from crystallized responsiveness particles | Bounded local modulation | |
| Effective responsiveness | Controls Boltzmann sharpness | ||
| Action-selection probability | Boltzmann distribution over candidate next states | Discrete instantiation of the Law of Motion | |
Continual Learning
Continual Learning studies how models acquire knowledge from changing data streams while retaining or selectively revising what they learned before.
See all 304 papers