MONETA: Multimodal Industry Classification through Geographic Information with Multi Agent Systems

Document classification forms the backbone of modern enterprise content management, yet existing benchmarks remain trapped in oversimplified paradigms -- single domain settings with flat label structures -- that bear little resemblance to the hierarchical, multi-modal, and cross-domain nature of real-world business documents. This gap not only misrepresents practical complexity but also stifles progress toward industrially viable document intelligence. To bridge this gap, we construct the first Multi-level, Multi-domain, Multi-modal document classification Benchmark (MMM-Bench). MMM-Bench includes (1) a deeply hierarchical taxonomy spanning five levels that capture the authentic organizational logic of business documentation; and (2) 5,990 real-world multi-modal documents meticulously curated from 12 commercial domains in Alibaba. Each document is manually annotated with a complete hierarchical path by domain experts. We establish comprehensive baselines on MMM-Bench, which consists of open-weight models and API-based models. Through systematic experiments, we identify four fundamental challenges within MMM-Bench and propose corresponding insights. To provide a solid foundation for advancing research in multi-level, multi-domain document classification, we release all of the data and the evaluation toolkit of MMM-Bench at https://github.com/MMMDC-Bench/MMMDC-Bench.

Industrial products such as valves and circuit breakers are defined by dense technical specifications that govern procurement, compatibility, and safety across supply chains. These specifications are scattered across multiple heterogeneous product images, including specification tables, nameplates, and technical drawings, yet whether Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can reliably recover them remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce IndustryBench-MIPU, the first large-scale benchmark for multi-image industrial product understanding, built around structured attribute extraction -- recovering property-value pairs from product images. This task jointly probes text recognition on specification tables and nameplates, visual reasoning over technical drawings, domain knowledge to decode industrial terminology, and cross-image evidence integration to assemble scattered specifications. Concretely, the benchmark comprises 4,559 products across 27,652 images with 103,703 annotations spanning 18 industrial categories, constructed through multi-model consensus and three-tier quality assurance. Evaluating nine MLLMs under both single-image and product-level multi-image settings reveals a stark completeness gap: models achieve high precision (86--94%) but the best recovers only 49.9% of product-level attributes; moving from single-image to multi-image extraction costs 15--34 percentage points of recall. Multi-image completeness, not single-image accuracy, is the core bottleneck. Dataset and code are publicly available.

A single multimodal large language model (MLLM) struggles to excel simultaneously at detection, localization, description, and reasoning in multimodal industrial anomaly understanding (MM-IAU). We show that in-domain training does not close this gap. On MMAD, a widely adopted MM-IAU benchmark, trained specialists reach at most 75.5% accuracy in defect localization, against 92.3% for human experts, and even detect anomalies less accurately than their untrained base model. Meanwhile, different MLLMs offer complementary strengths but share this weakness in fine-grained perception, so combining them alone cannot remove it. We therefore propose SiGMA, a spatially grounded multi-agent framework that divides labor between heterogeneous MLLM agents and a dedicated visual defect expert. A multimodal searcher supplies industrial knowledge and normal references, the defect expert turns query-reference comparison into calibrated anomaly evidence, and a label-free reliability controller weighs each source by task-wise competence and query-level evidence quality. SiGMA reaches 85.2% average accuracy on MMAD, 4.0% above the strongest trained specialist and Gemini-2.5-Pro and within 1.5% of human experts. Even with three agents of at most 9B parameters, it reaches 84.4%, and new MLLMs join without retraining.