Visual Enhanced Depth Scaling for Multimodal Latent Reasoning
Organizations: Beijing Institute of Technology · AMAP, Alibaba Group · City University of Hong Kong · Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences ·
Abstract
Multimodal latent reasoning has emerged as a promising paradigm that replaces explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) decoding with implicit feature propagation, simultaneously enhancing representation informativeness and reducing inference latency. By analyzing token-level gradient dynamics during latent training, we reveal two critical observations: (1) visual tokens exhibit significantly smaller gradient norms than their textual counterparts due to inherent language bias, resulting in systematic visual under-optimization; and (2) semantically simple tokens converge rapidly, whereas complex tokens exhibit persistent gradient instability constrained by fixed architectural depths. To address these limitations, we propose a visual replay module and routing depth scaling to collaboratively enhance visual perception and refine complicated latents for deeper contextual reasoning. The former module leverages causal self-attention to estimate token saliency, reinforcing fine-grained grounding through spatially-coherent constraints. Complementarily, the latter mechanism adaptively allocates additional reasoning steps to complex tokens, enabling deeper contextual refinement. Guided by a curriculum strategy that progressively internalizes explicit CoT into compact latent representations, our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks while delivering substantial inference speedups over explicit CoT baselines.
Figures & tables
| M 3 CoT | ScienceQA | GQA | ||||||||
| Method | Model | Acc.(%) | # AR Steps | Avg. Time | Acc.(%) | # AR Steps | Avg. Time | Acc.(%) | # AR Steps | Avg. Time |
| No-CoT | 45.4 | – | – | 64.4 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Multimodal CoT [ 80 ] | 42.5 | 106.3 | 3.10 | 58.3 | 83.9 | 2.44 | – | – | – | |
| CCoT [ 39 ] | 44.1 | 177.2 | 5.31 | 63.8 | 164.0 | 5.23 | 51.2 | 76.4 | 7.21 | |
| ICoT [ 13 ] | 46.0 | 96.5 | 2.86 | 65.4 | 77.4 | 2.28 | – | – | – | |
| SCAFFOLD [ 26 ] | 44.9 | 170.8 | 5.14 | 62.5 | 162.3 | 4.91 | 48.7 | 72.8 | 6.72 | |
| Model | Data Size | Vision-centric Reasoning | Compositional | Mathematics Reasoning | ||||||
| MMVP | SeedBench-2-Plus | HallusionBench | HRBench | BLINK | MMStar | MathVista | MathVision | MM-Math | ||
| Zero-Shot VLMs | ||||||||||
| GPT-4o [ 41 ] | – | 68.70 | 72.00 | – | – | 68.00 | 64.70 | 63.80 | 30.39 | 31.80 |
| Qwen2.5-VL-7B [ 2 ] | – | 65.67 | 65.31 | 56.57 | 68.25 | 53.60 | 59.70 | 68.20 | 25.60 | 37.50 |
| LLaVA-OneVision [ 29 ] | 9M | 74.00 | 61.22 | 51.10 | 63.00 | 49.34 | 59.13 | 58.60 | - | - |
| InternVL3.5-8B [ 60 ] | 70K | 57.67 | 69.78 | 56.15 | 59.38 | 54.81 | 53.33 | 71.60 | 28.30 | - |
| M 3 CoT (Acc.%) | ||||
| Method | Grid Size | |||
| Qwen2-VL-2B | 10 10 | 50.8 | 51.2 | 50.3 |
| Qwen2-VL-7B | 65.7 | 66.4 | 65.2 | |
| Qwen2.5-VL-3B | 65.0 | 65.3 | 64.5 | |
| Qwen2.5-VL-7B | 73.4 | 73.9 | 72.1 | |
Latent Visual Reasoning
Latent visual reasoning studies how multimodal models use compact internal visual states to solve perception, spatial, and temporal tasks.
See all 90 papers