Early Decisions Matter: Proximity Bias and Initial Trajectory Shaping in Non-Autoregressive Diffusion Language Models

While Autoregressive (AR) Transformer-based Generative Language Models are frequently employed for lookahead tasks, recent research suggests a potential discrepancy in their ability to perform planning tasks that require multi-step lookahead. In this work, we investigate the distinct emergent mechanisms that arise when training AR versus Non-Autoregressive (NAR) models, such as Discrete Diffusion Models (dLLMs), on lookahead tasks. By requiring the models to plan ahead to reach the correct conclusion, we analyze how these two paradigms fundamentally differ in their approach to the problem. We identify a critical asymmetry in planning problems: while forward generation requires complex lookahead at branching junctions, reverse generation is often deterministic. This asymmetry creates an opportunity for NAR models. Through mechanistic analysis of training and inference dynamics, we demonstrate that NAR models learn to solve planning tasks by utilizing future tokens to decode backwards, avoiding the need to learn complex traversal mechanisms entirely. Consequently, we report that both AR and NAR models are able to achieve perfect accuracy on the lookahead task. However, NAR models require exponentially fewer training examples and shallower architectures compared to AR models, which often fail to converge without specific curriculum adjustments.

Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) are often advertised as enabling parallel token generation, yet practical fast DLMs frequently converge to left-to-right, autoregressive (AR)-like decoding dynamics. In contrast, genuinely non-AR generation is promising because it removes AR's sequential bottleneck, better exploiting parallel hardware to reduce synchronization/communication overhead and improve latency scaling with output length. We argue that a primary driver of AR-like decoding is a mismatch between DLM objectives and the highly sequential structure of widely used training data, including standard pretraining corpora and long chain-of-thought (CoT) supervision. Motivated by this diagnosis, we propose NAP (Non-Autoregressive Parallel DLMs), a proof-of-concept, data-centric approach that better aligns supervision with non-AR parallel decoding. NAP curates examples as multiple independent reasoning trajectories and couples them with a parallel-forced decoding strategy that encourages multi-token parallel updates. Across math reasoning benchmarks, NAP yields stronger performance under parallel decoding than DLMs trained on standard long CoT data, with gains growing as parallelism increases. Our results suggest that revisiting data and supervision is a principled direction for mitigating AR-like behavior and moving toward genuinely non-autoregressive parallel generation in DLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/pixeli99/NAP.

Diffusion-based large language models (dLLMs) support parallel text generation via iterative denoising, yet inference remains latency-heavy because many steps are spent on redundant refinement and repeated remasking of tokens whose final values are already determined. Prior acceleration methods mainly depend on step-local confidence heuristics or fixed schedules, which are sensitive to prompt and task variation and ignore strong positional effects within a sequence. We cast diffusion decoding as a dynamic control problem and show that token-wise denoising trajectories provide the key signal for reliable control. We propose a trace-aware decoding framework with two components. First, Temporal-Spatial Parallel Decoding (TSPD) uses a lightweight temporalspatial controller that consumes per-token trajectory features, including confidence, entropy, and momentum, together with token position, to decide when a token has converged and can be safely fixed. Second, we introduce Confidence Extrapolation (CE), a training-free state-space module that forecasts future logit trends with uncertainty to support proactive decisions, including safe look-ahead and targeted stabilization when trajectories are oscillatory or underconfident. Together, TSPD and CE reduce unnecessary denoising iterations while preserving output quality, and they compose cleanly with system optimizations such as KV caching.