Pseudo-Unification: Entropy Probing Reveals Divergent Information Patterns in Unified Multimodal Models

While unified multimodal models (UMMs) jointly perform visual understanding and generation within a single model, functional unification does not guarantee learning synergy: the two objectives may reinforce each other, compete for capacity, or merely coexist. We investigate their relationship at the representation, task, and system levels in a controlled, structurally native setting without pretrained vision priors. At the representation level, we find that each objective provides useful signal to the other: generation enriches the visual features learned for understanding, while understanding strengthens vision--language alignment for generation. However, when both objectives are forced through the same computation path, one tends to dominate. A task-decoupled architecture that specializes conflicting visual computation while preserving semantic interaction avoids this asymmetric degradation. At the task level, through three case studies, we find positive bidirectional transfer when understanding and generation tasks rely on shared knowledge. At the system level, we show that an end-to-end UMM outperforms a matched planner--executor pipeline on complex tasks that explicitly require both image understanding and generation. Together, these results show that the value of UMMs extends beyond a unified interface: appropriate specialization, shared task knowledge, and end-to-end optimization can turn coexistence into synergy.

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) aim to integrate understanding and generation within a single architecture, yet it remains unclear whether these capabilities share a unified and transferable semantic space. This question is fundamentally challenging, as the two branches operate over heterogeneous representations (text tokens vs.\ visual latents) and distinct training objectives, making direct comparison difficult. To address this, we introduce cross-branch semantic steering, an intervention-based framework that extracts semantic directions from one branch and applies them to the other. We show that steering vectors learned from the understanding branch can transfer to generation, enabling controllable image synthesis and improved semantic faithfulness. In contrast, the reverse direction consistently shows limited effectiveness. Our analysis suggests that this asymmetry may be related to a practical representational mismatch: understanding-derived vectors capture transferable, object-centric semantics, while generation-derived vectors primarily encode low-level appearance features. Our results reveal that architectural unification does not guarantee semantic alignment, and establish cross-branch steering as a practical tool for probing multimodal representations.

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) aim to integrate multimodal understanding and generation within a unified architecture, yet it remains unclear to what extent textual and visual modalities are aligned. To investigate this question, we use reasoning-guided image generation as a diagnostic task, where models produce textual reasoning first and then generate images. We introduce UReason, a benchmark for evaluating reasoning-to-generation alignment in this paradigm, consisting of 2,000 human-curated and human-verified instances spanning five reasoning-intensive tasks: Code, Arithmetic, Spatial, Attribute, and Text. To enable controlled analysis, we develop an evaluation framework that compares direct generation, reasoning-guided generation, and decontextualized generation, which conditions only on the refined prompt extracted from reasoning. Across eight widely used open-source UMMs, while we find that reasoning-guided generation yields improvements over direct generation, somewhat surprisingly, decontextualized generation consistently outperforms reasoning-guided generation by a large margin. Our further analyses suggest that the intended visual semantics in textual reasoning are not reliably reflected in the generated images, despite their unified design and training. Overall, UReason serves as a practical litmus test for reasoning-to-generation alignment and provides a challenging benchmark for developing next-generation, more tightly aligned UMMs.