Recent Vision Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks. This raises the question of whether such general-purpose models can also address specialized visual recognition problems such as isolated sign language recognition (ISLR) without task-specific training. In this work, we investigate the capability of modern VLMs to perform ISLR in a zero-shot setting. We evaluate several open-source and proprietary VLMs on the WLASL300 benchmark. Our experiments show that, under prompt-only zero-shot inference, current open-source VLMs remain far behind classic supervised ISLR classifiers by a wide margin. However, follow-up experiments reveal that these models capture partial visual-semantic alignment between signs and text descriptions. Larger proprietary models achieve substantially higher accuracy, highlighting the importance of model scale and training data diversity. All our code is publicly available on GitHub.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Evaluation paradigms for zero-shot ISLR with VLMs. Top: Standard closed-set classification with defined target labels. Middle: Zero-shot prediction instructing the model to behave as an ASL expert capable of categorizing the input videos into an open set. Bottom: Zero-shot binary classification instructing the model to think about the input video to conclude whether the performed sign is the one the user thinks of, with optional knowledge about the data.
Model
Input Format
Top-1
Top-1 + Syn.
Time / vid (s)
Total (h)
Open-source
LLaVA-NeXT-Video-7B [ 42 ]
25 fps
0.30
0.45
0.55
0.10
InternVL3.5-14B [ 16 ]
32 frames/clip
0.30
1.20
11.81
2.19
64 frames/clip
0.00
0.17
26.00
4.22
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct [ 32 ]
4 fps
1.35
1.80
0.76
0.14
25 fps
1.20
1.35
3.22
0.60
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct [ 32 ]
4 fps
0.45
1.35
0.59
0.11
Table 1: WLASL300 (668 test split videos): Top-1 accuracy % (exact match) and synonym-aware Top-1 accuracy, together with average per-video processing time and total runtime, measured in the OpenAI API for GPT-5, the Google AI API for Gemini, and on a single NVIDIA H100 GPU for the remaining models. Reminder: SOTA on WLASL300 with a specialized closed-set classification model is 89.97%.
True
False
Model
Input
Positive
Negative
Positive
Negative
F1
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
Nonskeptical
425
116
380
73
0.65
Skeptical
166
429
69
332
0.45
No description
299
232
263
198
0.56
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
Nonskeptical
347
335
163
151
0.69
Skeptical
197
430
68
300
0.52
Table 2: Comparison of instruction variants for binary sign detection , where the model judges whether an input video matches a provided gloss description. Nonskeptical : the model describes the video, compares it to the description, and decides. Skeptical : the model first argues why the video does not match, then why it does , and finally decides. No description : the model is given only the gloss name (no textual description).
Model
Knowledge
Top-1
Top-1 + Syn.
PID
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
It’s ASL
1.20
1.35
56.59
It’s WLASL300
2.10
2.10
48.35
All glosses listed
2.25
2.54
88.92
Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
It’s ASL
0.45
1.20
16.47
It’s WLASL300
0.45
1.20
27.84
All glosses listed
1.50
1.80
87.13
Table 3: Comparison of dataset-knowledge prompting scenarios . It’s ASL : the prompt specifies only that the inputs are ASL videos. It’s WLASL300 : the prompt additionally states that the videos come from the WLASL300 dataset. All glosses listed : the prompt includes the full list of 300 WLASL300 candidate glosses. Results are reported for Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct (4 fps), Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct (4 fps) and Gemini-2.5-pro (8 frames/clip), including Top-1 accuracy, synonym-aware Top-1 accuracy, and PID (Predictions in Distribution), which denotes the percentage of predictions that fall within the WLASL300 label set (i.e., the predicted gloss is in-distribution).
Isolated Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) is conventionally cast as closed-set classification over gloss labels, which cannot generalize to signs unseen in training and ties every deployment to a gloss-annotated lexicon. We instead recognize signs extracted from continuous signing by (1) captioning a sign-level clip into a free-form procedural description of the articulation with an open-weight vision-language model, and (2) retrieving the closest entry from a vocabulary of target descriptions with a multilingual sentence encoder: a reverse sign language dictionary that needs no gloss supervision and admits an open vocabulary. On 1,300 sign-level segments from a Japanese Sign Language (JSL) dialogue corpus annotated with procedural descriptions (against a 2% top-10 chance floor over the 503-entry target vocabulary), fine-tuning the captioner substantially improves seen-class retrieval: language and vision tower fine-tuning raises top-10 retrieval on seen classes from 4.5% (untrained) to 49%, becoming statistically indistinguishable from a standard supervised closed-set classifier (I3D) on two of the three test sets where a closed-set classifier can be evaluated at all. More importantly, unseen-class retrieval also improves significantly over the untrained pipeline (11.5% -> 21.0% top-10, p=0.0094), a regime in which the closed-set classifier cannot participate. A matcher-side empirical upper-bound analysis shows the sentence encoder already recovers close to 100% of paraphrased gold descriptions, locating a gap in captioning quality that we aim to address in future work. To our knowledge this is the first description-based, open-vocabulary sign lookup from continuous signing without gloss supervision, and the first for JSL.
Santiago Poveda-Gutiérrez, Hideki Nakayama, Mayumi Bono
Grad. School of IST The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan · Information and Society Research Division National Institute of Informatics Tokyo, Japan
We present the first experiments on isolated sign language recognition (ISLR) for Icelandic Sign Language (ÍTM). We use ÍTM SignWiki, a dataset derived from a bilingual Icelandic--ÍTM online dictionary. It is genuinely low-resource: 1,845 videos cover 849 classes, 86% of which have only two examples, making the full task effectively one-shot recognition across signers. We compare two open-source ISLR frameworks, OpenHands and SPOTER, on three tasks of increasing vocabulary size (22, 117 and 849 classes), and evaluate three pose estimators and two forms of cross-lingual transfer. With ÍTM data alone, SPOTER outperforms OpenHands on all three tasks, and MediaPipe poses give better results than AlphaPose or SDPose. Cross-lingual transfer brings the largest gains: pretraining SPOTER on American Sign Language data before finetuning on ÍTM raises accuracy by 14--24 percentage points, to 72.7%, 47.9% and 22.6% on the three tasks, and multilingual training with data from six other sign languages lifts OpenHands from 1.41% to 28.86% on the full task. Although far from practical use, the results suggest that transfer from better-resourced sign languages is promising for very low-resource ones. We release our adapted versions of both frameworks.
Finnur Ágúst Ingimundarson, Guðný Björk Þorvaldsdóttir, Mathias Müller +1
Department of Computational Linguistics, University of Zurich · Communication Centre for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Iceland
Vision-language models (VLMs) have emerged as a powerful framework for multimodal video understanding. However, they remain limited in the sign language translation task, where we identify a key failure mode of existing VLMbased translators: poor spatial-temporal visual grounding. In particular, we find that standard next-token cross-entropy does not directly provide signal for where and when the model should attend, causing models to overlook sign-relevant regions and frames. To address this challenge, we propose AttnSign, a VLM-based spatial-temporal attention steering framework for sign language translation. AttnSign first introduces spatial attention supervision for sign-relevant regions, such as face and hands, in each frame; then develops an RL-based motion-cadence steering method that encourages the model to explore and focus on sign-level keyframes. Experimental results on How2Sign and OpenASL benchmarks show that our proposed AttnSign consistently outperforms existing methods.
Meibo Hu, Guohao Sun, Annemarie D. Ross +2
Rochester Institute of Technology · National Technical Institute for the Deaf / Rochester Institute of Technology · University of Virginia