Out of Context: Reliability in Multimodal Anomaly Detection Requires Contextual Inference

Multi-Modal Anomaly Detection (MMAD) detects rare abnormal events from heterogeneous data sources and is increasingly used in safety- and reliability-critical applications such as industrial inspection and cybersecurity. Yet the literature is fragmented across domains and modality combinations, and existing surveys usually group methods by architecture rather than by how abnormality is defined and separated in multi-modal settings. We survey MMAD from an assumption-driven perspective. We formalize the problem, identify five intrinsic characteristics underlying its core challenges, and organize prior work into two complementary paradigms. The first, normality-assumption methods, models regularity via representation learning, cross-modal alignment, and knowledge enhancement. The second, anomaly-assumption methods, sharpens decision boundaries through coarse-grained, structural, and semantic anomaly injection. We also investigate how foundation models are reshaping MMAD through scalable pretraining, flexible cross-modal transfer, and emerging reasoning capabilities. Finally, we compile representative benchmarks and evaluation protocols across domains and highlight open problems and future directions for robust, adaptive, and interpretable MMAD systems.

Fault detection is essential in industrial systems, enabling early identification of abnormal behaviour and improving safety, reliability, and operational efficiency. Modern systems increasingly rely on heterogeneous sensing modalities that capture complementary aspects of the underlying physical process. However, existing data-driven anomaly detection methods often process each modality independently or use simple feature-level fusion, limiting their ability to exploit cross-modal relationships that characterize normal system behaviour. Their performance also commonly assumes similar training and deployment distributions, whereas real-world operation is affected by changing operating conditions, environmental influences, and system degradation that induce distribution shifts and reduce detection performance, especially in unseen regimes. In this work, we propose a multimodal anomaly detection framework based on cross-modal reconstruction of heterogeneous time-series sensor data. Rather than modeling each modality independently, the framework learns system dynamics by reconstructing each modality from the others, thereby exploiting complementary information across modalities. This integrates information across sensing channels without requiring explicit temporal alignment or identical sampling rates, while improving robustness to sensor noise, missing measurements, and modality-specific disturbances. To address distribution shifts during real-world deployment, anomalies are identified using cross-modal reconstruction error and an adaptive test-time thresholding mechanism that adjusts to changing operating conditions. Experiments on three industrial case studies show strong fault detection performance and substantially improved robustness under out-of-distribution conditions, with the largest gains observed in the most challenging operating regimes.

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) show strong few-shot generalization, but industrial anomaly detection remains difficult because defects are small, input resolution is limited, and textual standards are not always grounded in visual evidence. Recent optimization-based methods improve alignment through fine-tuning, but they often require many defective samples, which are unavailable in early deployment. We present Global Logic and Local Search (GLLS), a training-free framework for reference-guided multimodal in-context verification. GLLS uses a Part-Aware Visual-Logical Atlas to organize normal references and structured specifications in the inference context. It combines a Global & Logic Stream, where SAM 3 extracts partially checkable visual facts, with a Fine-Grained & Actions Stream, where MCTS selects local evidence crops under a fixed budget. Experiments on MMAD-QA and additional anomaly detection datasets show consistent gains over matched and general-purpose baselines, while keeping the final diagnostic decision traceable to explicit visual evidence throughout the inspection trace.