Sandpile Economics: Theory, Identification, and Evidence
Organizations: Inter-American Development Bank & IDB Invest
Abstract
Why do capitalist economies recurrently generate crises whose severity is disproportionate to the size of the triggering shock? This paper proposes a structural answer grounded in the evolutionary geometry of production networks. As economies evolve through specialization, integration, and competitive selection, their inter-sectoral linkages drift toward configurations of increasing geometric fragility, eventually crossing a threshold beyond which small disturbances generate disproportionately large cascades. We introduce Sandpile Economics, a formal framework that interprets macroeconomic instability as an emergent property of disequilibrium production networks. The key state variable is the Forman--Ricci curvature of the input--output graph, capturing local substitution possibilities when supply chains are disrupted. We show that when curvature falls below an endogenous threshold, the distribution of cascade sizes follows a power law with tail index , implying a regime of unbounded amplification. The underlying mechanism is evolutionary: specialization reduces input substitutability, pushing the economy toward criticality, while crisis episodes induce endogenous network reconfiguration and path dependence. These dynamics are inherently non-ergodic and cannot be captured by representative-agent frameworks. Empirically, using global input--output data, we document that production networks operate in persistently negative curvature regimes and that curvature robustly predicts medium-run output dynamics. A one-standard-deviation increase in curvature is associated with higher cumulative growth over three-year horizons, and curvature systematically outperforms standard network metrics in explaining cross-country differences in resilience.
Figures & tables
| Specification | -stat ( -value) | Instruments | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline GMM (DK-HAC) | Geo. distance, | 645 | |
| Alternative (lagged ) | Geo. distance, | 645 |
| Variable | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Median | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel A: Curvature variables (lagged one year) | ||||||
| Mean curvature | 26,351 | |||||
| Curvature dispersion | 26,351 | |||||
| Share of fragile edges ( ) | 26,351 | |||||
| Panel B: Outcome variables | ||||||
| Output growth | 26,351 | |||||
| Curvature quartile | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bottom (most fragile): | ||||
| Middle two quartiles: | ||||
| Top (most resilient): | ||||
| Full sample |
| Specification | Filter | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel A: Varying (fragile quartile) | ||||
| (inclusive) | Negative only | |||
| (KS-optimal) | Negative only | |||
| (restrictive) | Negative only | |||
| Panel B: Varying filter (full sample) | ||||
| All episodes | Both signs | |||
| Statistic | Simulated | Theoretical | Empirical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tail exponent | |||
| — | |||
| — | |||
| — | |||
| Fraction (by country) | predicted |
| Model | Adj. | AIC | BIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricci curvature (winner) | 26,351 | |||
| Betweenness centrality | 26,351 | |||
| PageRank centrality | 26,351 | |||
| Herfindahl index (HHI) | 26,351 | |||
| Eigenvector centrality | 26,351 | |||
| Full model (all metrics jointly) | 26,351 |
| Direct effect ( ) | Amplification ( ) | ||||||
| Coeff. | SE | Coeff. | SE | ||||
| 1 | 26,351 | ||||||
| 2 | 24,324 | ||||||
| 3 | 22,297 | ||||||
| 4 | 20,270 | ||||||
| 5 | 18,243 | ||||||