Disentangled Dual-Branch Graph Learning for Conversational Emotion Recognition
Organizations: College of Computer and Mathematics, Central South University of Forestry and Technology · Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care · Department of Computer Science, State University of New York
Abstract
Multimodal emotion recognition in conversations aims to infer utterance-level emotions by jointly modeling textual, acoustic, and visual cues within context. Despite recent progress, key challenges remain, including redundant cross-modal information, imperfect semantic alignment, and insufficient modeling of high-order speaker interactions. To address these issues, we propose a framework that combines dual-space feature disentanglement with dual-branch graph learning. A shared encoder and modality-specific encoders are used to separate modality-invariant and modality-specific representations. The invariant features are modeled by a Fourier graph neural network to capture global consistency and complementary patterns, with a frequency-domain contrastive objective to enhance discriminability. In parallel, a speaker-aware hypergraph is constructed over modality-specific features to model high-order interactions, along with a speaker-consistency constraint to maintain coherent semantics. Finally, the two branches are fused for utterance-level emotion prediction. Experiments on IEMOCAP and MELD demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance over strong baselines, validating its effectiveness.
Figures & tables
| Methods | IEMOCAP | MELD | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Happy | Sad | Neutral | Angry | Excited | Frustrated | WF1 | Neutral | Surprise | Sadness | Happy | Anger | WF1 | |
| DialogueRNN | 32.20 | 80.26 | 57.89 | 62.82 | 73.87 | 59.76 | 62.89 | 76.97 | 47.69 | 20.41 | 50.92 | 45.52 | 57.66 |
| HCL | 48.97 | 82.21 | 60.88 | 66.72 | 69.43 | 68.73 | 68.73 | - | - | - | - | - | 63.89 |
| MVN | 55.75 | 73.30 | 61.88 | 65.96 | 69.50 | 64.21 | 65.44 | 76.65 | 53.18 | 21.82 | 53.62 | 42.55 | 59.03 |
| SCMM | 45.37 | 78.76 | 63.54 | 66.05 | 76.70 | 66.18 | 67.53 | - | - | - | - | - | 59.44 |
| MMGCN | 45.14 | 77.16 | 64.36 | 68.82 | 74.71 | 61.40 | 66.26 | 76.33 | 48.15 | 26.74 | 53.02 | 46.09 | 58.31 |
| Methods | IEMOCAP | MELD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acc | WF1 | Acc | WF1 | |
| Ours | 70.63 | 70.81 | 66.48 | 65.70 |
| - w/o Decoupler | 67.16 | 67.38 | 63.14 | 62.41 |
| - w/o Shared Branch (FourierGraph) | 65.83 | 66.01 | 61.87 | 61.08 |
| - w/o Private Branch (HGNN) | 68.02 | 68.19 | 64.23 | 63.47 |
| - w/o Transformer Fusion | 68.91 | 69.07 | 64.89 | 64.12 |