CLion: Efficient Cautious Lion Optimizer with Enhanced Generalization

The LION (evoLved sIgn mOmeNtum) optimizer for deep neural network training was found by Google via program search, with the simple sign update yet showing impressive performance in training large scale networks. Although previous studies have investigated its convergence properties, a comprehensive analysis, especially the convergence rate, is still desirable. Recognizing that LION can be regarded as solving a specific constrained problem, this paper focuses on demonstrating its convergence to the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) point at the rate of $\cal O(\sqrt{d}K^{-1/4})$ measured by gradient $\ell_1$ norm, where $d$ is the problem dimension and $K$ is the number of iteration steps. Step further, we remove the constraint and establish that LION converges to the critical point of the general unconstrained problem at the same rate. This rate not only delivers the currently optimal dependence on the problem dimension $d$ but also tightly matches the theoretical lower bound for nonconvex stochastic optimization algorithms, which is typically measured using the gradient $\ell_2$ norm, with respect to the number of iterations $K$. Through extensive experiments, we not only demonstrate that LION achieves lower loss and higher performance compared to standard SGD, but also empirically confirm that the gradient $\ell_1/\ell_2$ norm ratio aligns with $Θ(\sqrt{d})$, thus proving that our convergence rate matches the theoretical lower bound with respect to $d$ in the empirical sense.

In large-scale optimization, the cheapness and effectiveness of update steps are the most crucial factors for a successful optimizer. Sign-based optimizers like Lion or Signum produce cheap per-step updates, whereas Muon's spectral matrix-sign update gives a much stronger direction at a substantially higher per-step cost. In this work, we propose LionMuon, which retains the effectiveness of Muon steps while considerably cutting the averaged iteration cost, similar to sign-based methods. It alternates between Lion's and Muon's updates on a fixed period P, sharing a single dual-EMA momentum buffer between them. The optimizer state memory therefore matches Lion and is exactly half of AdamW's. A simpler single-EMA variant, SignMuon, by itself already outperforms pure Muon. At P = 2, LionMuon Pareto-dominates Muon, Lion, Signum, and AdamW on every dataset and architecture we tested at 124M model size, reaching lower validation loss at lower compute, and the same advantage persists at 355M and 720M scale. On the theory side, we prove sharp complexity bounds under heavy-tailed noise which are governed by period-averaged smoothness and noise that interpolate between Muon's and Lion's constants. These bounds predict the compute-optimal period and the conditions under which LionMuon outruns Muon and Lion. Code: https://github.com/brain-lab-research/lion-muon

Matrix-structured parameters frequently appear in many artificial intelligence models such as large language models. More recently, an efficient Muon optimizer is designed for matrix parameters of large-scale models, and shows markedly faster convergence than the vector-wise algorithms. Although some works have begun to study convergence properties (i.e., optimization error) of the Muon optimizer, its generalization properties (i.e., generalization error) is still not established. Thus, in this paper, we study generalization error of the Muon optimizer based on algorithmic stability and mathematical induction, and prove that the Muon has a generalization error of $O\big(\frac{1}{Nκ^{T}}\big)$, where $N$ is training sample size, and $T$ denotes iteration number, and $κ>0$ denotes minimum difference between singular values of gradient estimate. To enhance generalization of the Muon, we propose an effective mixed Muon (MiMuon) optimizer by cautiously using orthogonalization of gradient, which is a hybrid of Muon and momentum-based SGD optimizers. Then we prove that our MiMuon optimizer has a lower generalization error of $O\big(\frac{1}{N}\big)$ than $O\big(\frac{1}{Nκ^{T}}\big)$ of Muon optimizer, since $κ$ generally is very small. Meanwhile, we also studied the convergence properties of our MiMuon algorithm, and prove that our MiMuon algorithm has the same convergence rate of $O(\frac{1}{T^{1/4}})$ as the Muon algorithm. Some numerical experimental results on training large models including Qwen3-0.6B and YOLO26m demonstrate efficiency of the MiMuon optimizer.