On the Use of Iterative Problem Solving for the Traveling Salesperson Problem with Changing Time Window Constraints

Evolutionary multitasking allows several related problems to be solved in a single run of an algorithm. In this paper, we investigate integrating evolutionary multitasking with Edge Assembly Crossover (MT-EAX) to solve the classical Travelling Salesperson Problem (TSP). To fairly compare MT-EAX against standard EAX under strict compute budgets, we evaluate three scaling methods: generation scaling, population scaling, and balanced scaling. Our results show that generationally scaled MT-EAX is highly effective compute-wise in the early stages of the search, saving $60\%$ to $90\%$ of compute for equal or better solution quality. We observe that instance geometry has a significant impact, with clustered, normally distributed instances securing larger improvements than uniformly distributed ones. However, when scaling by population or utilising explicit solution transfer, the results are negative due to population starvation and incompatible cross-instance parent selection. We demonstrate that the advantage of MT-EAX derives from increased diversity through parallel search in early generations, which can be successfully preserved using a decoupled configuration to often strictly outperform or match standard EAX performance at final convergence.

The traveling salesman problem (TSP) is a canonical NP-hard combinatorial optimization benchmark that tests the representational capacity and generalization of neural solvers. While non-autoregressive (NAR) approaches offer parallel inference, they often lack sufficient geometric inductive bias and stable training signals, leading to degraded performance under cross-scale and cross-distribution shifts. We propose GeoRouteNet, a geometry-enhanced NAR neural solver for Euclidean TSP. On the model side, GeoRouteNet incorporates centered node features, learnable radial distance basis functions, distance-aware graph attention with explicit edge messaging, LayerNorm-SwiGLU feed-forward blocks, and cross-layer attentive residual mixing. On the training side, we design multi-candidate self-comparison reinforcement learning (MCS-RL), which samples multiple candidate tours per instance, constructs adaptive baselines from greedy and peer candidates, and adds winner-candidate guidance with annealed entropy regularization. On 10,000 random TSP50 instances, GeoRouteNet achieves a 0.32% optimality gap under Beam-1000 decoding. On TSP100, the gap is 1.26%. On 27 stratified TSPLIB EUC_2D instances, the overall gap drops from 17.12% (NAR4TSP reproduction) to 3.60%, while batch inference throughput substantially exceeds that of Concorde and LKH3. Ablation studies confirm that geometric structure enhancement and multi-candidate training are complementary: structure improvements dominate cross-distribution gains, while MCS-RL further stabilizes solution quality when paired with a strong geometric encoder.

Automated Algorithm Selection (AS) aims to improve problem-solving performance by selecting, for each problem instance, the most suitable algorithm from a predefined portfolio. This is particularly relevant to the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), where solver performance is strongly instance-dependent. We introduce GNNAS-TSP, a Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based AS framework that learns TSP instance representations directly from raw graph data, avoiding manual feature engineering. GNNAS-TSP formulates AS as a joint cost-prediction and ranking task. We evaluate cost-based (mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and Huber), rank-based (RankNet, ListNet, and LambdaRank), and hybrid learning objectives for a portfolio comprising Chained Lin-Kernighan, Edge Assembly Crossover, Lin-Kernighan-Helsgaun, Multiagent Optimization System, and Concorde. Experiments use fixed computational budgets of 10 and 60 seconds. On the held-out test set, the selected configurations improve on the Single Best Solver (SBS) in normalized solution cost at both budgets. For the 10s budget, AS achieves substantial and statistically significant cost improvement over SBS. Overall, the results suggest that GNNAS-TSP is a useful meta-solving strategy when exploitable variation exists across solver performance.