cs.LGMar 12, 2026

Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning

Authors: Brady Steele

Organizations: Georgia Institute of Technology

Abstract

We find that LoRA fine-tuning exhibits un-learning on contested examples: items with high annotator disagreement show increasing loss during training, a qualitatively distinct pattern largely absent under full fine-tuning and consistent across all six models tested (four encoder, two decoder-only). This discovery emerges from correlating annotation entropy, computed from ChaosNLI's 100 labels per example, with per-example area under the loss curve (AULC) on SNLI and MNLI. The correlation is positive in all 25 conditions tested (Spearman ρ=0.06ρ= 0.06-0.430.43), with decoder-only models showing stronger correlations than encoders at matched LoRA rank. The effect survives partial-correlation controls and replicates across seeds and datasets. A preliminary noise-injection experiment is consistent with these findings.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables12 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Sep 5, 2026

One Rate Is Not Enough: Adaptive Anisotropic Learning Rates for LoRA Fine-Tuning

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large language models. Most LoRA variants follow a uniform-LR convention, applying a single global learning rate across every rank-one component of every adapter. We show that this convention overlooks substantial within-module heterogeneity, where the rank-one components of a LoRA adapter update at highly uneven rates and low-velocity modules converge to concentrated singular spectra that underutilize the nominal rank budget. To address this, we propose an adaptive anisotropic learning-rate model that assigns each rank-one component its own effective learning rate, computed online from training-time signals and mean-normalized per module to preserve the global LR budget. AnLR-LoRA instantiates this model with two signals available during AdamW optimization, namely function-space velocity and Adam SNR, as a lightweight scheme with no extra trainable parameters. Across commonsense reasoning, natural language generation and visual instruction-tuning benchmarks, AnLR-LoRA consistently improves over LoRA while encouraging broader use of rank capacity, with gains that remain robust across a wide range of global learning rates and transfer cleanly to other LoRA variants.
May 5, 2026

Rethinking the Rank Threshold for LoRA Fine-Tuning

A recent landscape analysis of LoRA fine-tuning in the neural tangent kernel regime establishes a sufficient condition r(r+1)/2>KNr(r+1)/2 > KN on the LoRA rank rr for the absence of spurious local minima under squared-error loss, prescribing r≥12r \geq 12 on canonical few-shot RoBERTa setups. The condition is stated for general output dimension KK, so its sharpness in any particular regime, and its practical implication for the cross-entropy loss actually used in fine-tuning, are open. We give three results that together reduce the prescribed rank to r=1r = 1 for binary classification in this regime. First, replacing the symmetric Sard-form count with the non-symmetric LoRA manifold dimension yields a strictly weaker capacity requirement, r(m+n)−r2>C∗⋅KNr(m+n) - r^2 > C^* \cdot KN with C∗≈1.35C^* \approx 1.35 under Gaussian-iid features, satisfied at r=1r = 1 on canonical setups. Second, in the cross-entropy setting the Polyak--Łojasiewicz inequality removes the rank threshold entirely. Third, a Rademacher-complexity bound predicts rank-one variance optimality precisely when the bias term is saturated, which is the case for binary classification but not for K>2K > 2. Empirically, across four GLUE-style binary tasks, three encoder architectures, and at scale on RoBERTa-large, rank one is competitive with the existing prescription r=12r = 12; on multi-class MNLI the optimal rank shifts above one, also as predicted. The binary-regime guarantees are conditional on standard NTK assumptions; the multi-class extension is left to future work.
Oct 24, 2026

Task Format as a Factor in Adaptation: A Controlled Comparison of LoRA and Full Fine-Tuning for Prompt-Safety Classification

Fine-tuning a language model for classification involves many design decisions. Comparisons of low-rank adaptation (LoRA) with full fine-tuning are common but often confounded, and task format is rarely studied. We compare both regimes on prompt-safety classification with a matched 400M encoder-decoder pair (Ettin) across three task formats, with up to 15 seeds per cell and pre-specified analyses. At the pre-specified learning rates, full fine-tuning leads LoRA by 2-3 pp in every architecture and format trained on the label alone. On the encoder, the gap closes once both rates are chosen by the same search. Training LoRA to write a reason after its verdict adds 4.0 pp and closes the gap, but a content-free sentence of equal length does not. Trained models score above a prompted 8B in domain but fall behind it on two of three out-of-distribution corpora, trailing by 8-23 pp on adversarial jailbreaks and flagging 27-66% of benign but harmful-looking prompts as unsafe, against the 8B's 2-3%. Together, the results suggest that the adaptation regime matters less than how each model is trained, its learning rate, and training target, and that in-domain accuracy alone is an incomplete guide to robustness.