A Comparative Evaluation of Geometric Accuracy in NeRF and Gaussian Splatting

Triangle-based neural rendering bridges neural scene representations and conventional graphics pipelines by optimizing explicit geometric primitives compatible with standard rasterization hardware. However, existing approaches are evaluated almost exclusively within custom research renderers, obscuring their practical deployability in production engines. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textbf{MeshSplatBench}, a unified benchmark that systematically investigates triangle-based neural rendering across the complete pipeline from native optimization to game-engine deployment. MeshSplatBench establishes a standardized evaluation protocol while preserving each method's native optimization semantics, reproducing published results within $0.8\%$ PSNR deviation. Furthermore, we introduce a hierarchical Unity deployment protocol spanning three rendering tiers: native CUDA renderers, method-specific dedicated engine shaders, and standard opaque mesh pipelines, isolating the exact fidelity losses caused by engine adaptation \textit{vs.} representation reduction. Finally, we conduct a topological audit of reconstructed surfaces, demonstrating that explicit connectivity and shared indexing alone are insufficient to guarantee production-ready assets due to prevalent non-manifold structures, fragmented components, and boundary artifacts. Overall, MeshSplatBench demonstrates that rasterizability is merely a primitive-level attribute, whereas graphics readiness requires jthe holistic alignment of representation, topology, and engine compatibility. Source code will be released.

Three-dimensional Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) combines explicit primitives with efficient rasterization, yet recent systems increasingly use neural networks to generate or share Gaussian parameters. We characterize this trend along five axes: attribute decoding, spatial sharing, view-conditioned decoding, topology generation, and amortized inference. An analysis of 19 representative methods shows that these choices address different limitations and cannot be reduced to a binary neural label. We also isolate three forms of neural parameterization in a controlled mip-NeRF 360 study. Sharing appearance and opacity improves reconstruction quality, while decoding geometric structure offers no further gain. The evidence favors selective neuralization: shared functions help when they capture reusable correlations without sacrificing the local geometric freedom of explicit splats.

Standard MipNeRF360-style 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) evaluation holds out every N-th frame -- but these frames have trained neighbors on both sides, so the metric measures near-trajectory interpolation rather than spatial generalization. We introduce a fair matched-count protocol that isolates this effect: both arms train on the same number of images and differ only in whether the holdout is spread evenly (interpolation) or forms a contiguous spatial sector (extrapolation). Our primary finding is a large, consistent interpolation-extrapolation gap of 3~12dB -- several times the differences typically reported between competing methods. The gap is robust to training noise, is in two cases large enough to flip a method ranking under multi-seed confirmation, and -- crucially -- persists across three representation families, including a non-Gaussian volumetric neural radiance field (NeRF), so it reflects spatial coverage rather than any one representation. Diagnostically, it is dominated by a diffuse/geometry-proxy component and tracks each view's angular distance to its nearest training view, a zero-cost signal that also guides capture planning; loss-side regularization yields only marginal gains. Standard holdouts remain useful for near-trajectory rendering but should not, alone, be read as evidence of spatial generalization. Prior work notes protocol sensitivity; ours is, to our knowledge, the first to combine matched-count paired holdout, cross-representation quantification, and a diagnostic analysis Table 1. We describe a spatial-holdout benchmark toolkit with standardized splits and baselines for 16 scenes, which we are preparing for public release.