Online federated learning (OFL) has emerged as a popular framework for decentralized decision-making over continuous data streams without compromising client privacy. However, the adversary model assumed in standard OFL typically precludes any potential benefits of parallelization. Further, it fails to adequately capture the different sources of statistical variation in OFL problems. In this paper, we extend the OFL paradigm by integrating a stochastically extended adversary (SEA). Under this framework, the loss function remains fixed across clients over time. However, the adversary dynamically and independently selects the data distribution for each client at each time. We propose the \algoOFL{} algorithm to solve this problem, which utilizes online stochastic gradient descent at the clients, along with periodic global aggregation via the server. We establish bounds on the global network regret over a time horizon T for two classes of functions: (1) for smooth and convex losses, we prove an O(T) bound, and (2) for smooth and strongly convex losses, we prove an O(logT) bound. Through careful analysis, we quantify the individual impact of both spatial (across clients) and temporal (over time) data heterogeneity on the regret bounds. Consequently, we identify a regime of mild temporal variation (relative to stochastic gradient variance), where the network regret improves with parallelization. Hence, in the SEA setting, our results improve the existing pessimistic worst-case results in online federated learning.
There are two categories of methods in Federated Learning (FL) for joint training across multiple clients: (i) parallel FL (PFL), where clients train models in a parallel manner; and (ii) sequential FL (SFL), where clients train models in a sequential manner. In contrast to that of PFL, the convergence theory of SFL on heterogeneous data is still lacking. In this paper, we establish the convergence guarantees of SFL for strongly/general/non-convex objectives on heterogeneous data. The convergence guarantees of SFL are better than that of PFL on heterogeneous data with both full and partial client participation. Experimental results validate the counterintuitive analysis result that SFL outperforms PFL on extremely heterogeneous data in cross-device settings.
Federated learning (FL) is an emerging distributed machine learning paradigm that enables local devices to jointly train a global model while keeping data decentralized and private. We propose a variance-reduction based algorithm, VRA-FedSGD, for FL in the presence of heavy-tailed gradient noise and communication noise, where these noises are prevalent in large-scale machine learning over wireless networks and Internet of Things deployments. VRA-FedSGD employs a momentum variance reduction technique together with a nonlinear mapping to mitigate heavy-tailed gradient noise, and uses a variance-reduced aggregation mechanism to suppress heavy-tailed communication noise. In the mean sense, VRA-FedSGD achieves a convergence rate of {\smallO(K−(p−1)/(2p−1))} for nonconvex objective functions, where p is the tail index of heavy-tailed noise. In the almost sure sense, VRA-FedSGD achieves a convergence rate of O~(K−(1−1/(p−ε))) for strongly convex objective functions, where ε is an arbitrarily small constant. Simulated experiments on a logistic regression problem with real-world data verify the effectiveness of VRA-FedSGD.
We consider Decision-Focused Federated Learning (DFFL), a predict-then-optimize setting in which multiple clients collaboratively train predictive models for downstream linear optimization problems without exchanging raw data. Besides the data heterogeneity typical of standard federated learning, clients may also have different objective functions and feasible regions. Building on the SPO+ surrogate loss, we derive heterogeneity bounds that separate objective shift, measured through cost-vector distances, from feasible-set shift, measured through support-function and shape-distance terms. We show that, for general compact feasible sets, small objective perturbations can still induce nonvanishing decision-focused loss discrepancies, while strongly convex feasible regions yield sharper stability-based bounds. We then lift these pointwise bounds to a local-versus-federated excess-risk comparison, showing that federation is beneficial when the statistical advantage of pooling exceeds a client-specific heterogeneity penalty. Computational experiments on polyhedral and strongly convex problems confirm that federation is substantially more robust under strongly convex feasible regions. Finally, we evaluate a simple validation-based interpolation between local and federated DFFL models. This interpolation mitigates the theoretical tradeoff and reduces aggregate regret and worst-client harm in both synthetic experiments and a PJM energy-pricing case study.