Organizations: Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. · University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Abstract
Vision Transformers (ViTs) have achieved remarkable success across vision tasks, yet recent studies show they remain vulnerable to backdoor attacks. Existing patch-wise attacks typically assume a single fixed trigger location during inference to maximize trigger attention. However, they overlook the self-attention mechanism in ViTs, which captures long-range dependencies across patches. In this work, we observe that a patch-wise trigger can achieve high attack effectiveness when activating backdoors across neighboring patches, a phenomenon we term the Trigger Radiating Effect (TRE). We further find that inter-patch trigger insertion during training can synergistically enhance TRE compared to single-patch insertion. Prior ViT-specific attacks that maximize trigger attention often sacrifice visual and attention stealthiness, making them detectable. Based on these insights, we propose PASTA, a twofold stealthy patch-wise backdoor attack in both pixel and attention domains. PASTA enables backdoor activation when the trigger is placed at arbitrary patches during inference. To achieve this, we introduce a multi-location trigger insertion strategy to enhance TRE. However, preserving stealthiness while maintaining strong TRE is challenging, as TRE is weakened under stealthy constraints. We therefore formulate a bi-level optimization problem and propose an adaptive backdoor learning framework, where the model and trigger iteratively adapt to each other to avoid local optima. Extensive experiments show that PASTA achieves 99.13% attack success rate across arbitrary patches on average, while significantly improving visual and attention stealthiness (144.43x and 18.68x) and robustness (2.79x) against state-of-the-art ViT defenses across four datasets, outperforming CNN- and ViT-based baselines.
Addressing the escalating security vulnerabilities in Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, this study investigates backdoor attacks targeting the visual pathway. We identify a core obstacle causing the failure of traditional attack paradigms: "Gradient Interference." This phenomenon represents an optimization failure triggered by conflicting strategies during end-to-end training. To resolve this, we propose an Adaptive Threat-Aware Adversarial Tuning (ATAAT) framework. Through its core "Threat-Method Adaptive Mapping" mechanism, ATAAT intelligently selects the optimal gradient decoupling strategy based on the adversary's capabilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that ATAAT exhibits significant advantages, achieving a highly robust Targeted Attack Success Rate (TASR > 80%) while maintaining extreme stealthiness with merely a 5% poisoning rate. It efficiently handles complex semantic-level triggers and achieves implicit decoupled attacks in data poisoning scenarios for the first time. This work reveals a critical security vulnerability in VLAs and provides theoretical and methodological support for future defense architectures.
Vision Transformers (ViTs) remain vulnerable to localized adversarial attacks, e.g., adversarial patches, while recent test-time defenses mitigate them by suppressing image tokens with abnormally high attention scores. These defenses exploit a strong coupling between attention and adversarial effectiveness: adversarial tokens often need to attract substantial attention to influence the prediction. We introduce adversarial decoys, independently optimized image patches that redirect the attention, and therefore related defenses, toward selected target tokens. Rather than jointly optimizing misclassifications and defense evasion, our approach decouples the two objectives: the original adversarial region induces the incorrect prediction, while a separate decoy manipulates the attention ranking used by the defense. A layer-wise objective increases target-token attention and promotes these tokens above competing non-target ones. Since the decoy is optimized independently of the underlying attack, the method is attack-agnostic and can be easily integrated with any existing adversarial patch attack. Experiments on ImageNet across multiple ViT architectures and attacks show that decoys can redirect high attention scores away from the true adversarial region while preserving much of the attack effectiveness. These results reveal a fundamental limitation of using attention magnitude as an indicator of adversarial relevance.
Giulia Marchiori Pietrosanti, Giulio Rossolini, Giorgio Buttazzo
Existing ViT backdoor attacks based on backbone-overwriting full-tuning are computationally expensive and inflict performance degradation. This has forced adversaries towards the Visual Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) paradigm, dominated by adapter-based (e.g., LoRA) and prompt-based (e.g., VPT) approaches. While adapter security has seen initial study, the risks of the burgeoning prompt-based ecosystem remain critically unexplored. We fill this critical gap, exposing how the evolution of VPT towards dynamic and context-aware architectures can facilitate a far more dangerous and emergent threat. This vulnerability arises even though these dynamic modules unlock superior benign performance. We propose VIPER, an attack framework built on a lightweight, dynamic Visual Prompt Generator (VPG) that demonstrates this vulnerability. Critically, this dynamic architecture enables Functional Fusion: an emergent phenomenon where malicious logic and benign task utility are tightly fused into the same sparse, high-magnitude parameter core. This fusion creates a formidable ``hostage" dilemma, as pruning the attack necessarily destroys the benign performance. Comprehensive evaluations show VIPER effectively addresses the attacker's trilemma: VIPER not only achieves state-of-the-art performance on clean data, but also maintains near-100% ASR even under 90% VPG-module pruning (where LoRA attacks collapse), while adding only an imperceptible 0.06ms (1.16%) of inference latency. VIPER's results, driven by Functional Fusion, expose a new, paradigm-level risk in dynamic prompt architectures.