Improving Facial Emotion Recognition through Dataset Merging and Balanced Training Strategies

Facial Expression Recognition faces two core challenges. The first is class imbalance in public datasets, which skews the learning process and weakens generalization. The second is related to privacy and data collection constraints, which limit the sharing of facial images and restrict the creation of large, balanced datasets. To address these issues, we examine three complementary strategies for constructing privacy-preserving FER datasets in the standard seven discrete facial expression classes setting. Our strategies are: (i) pseudo-labeling large unlabeled face collections with a teacher model under a confidence-thresholding scheme, (ii) prompt-driven synthesis using diffusion models conditioned on demographic attributes, and (iii) task-aware GAN-based expression editing that modifies facial expression while preserving identity and realism. For training and evaluation, we employed widely adopted datasets, including AffectNet, RAF-DB, and FER2013. We utilized the synthetic datasets DigiFace, DCFace, and EmoNet-Face BIG as unlabeled sources for pseudo-labeling. Additionally, we utilized the FFHQ dataset as the source for generative synthesis. The main experiments are conducted using a classic CNN backbone, IR50, and we also explore a more complex architecture, POSTERv1, to assess its feasibility and robustness. Using cross-dataset evaluations, we analyze the trade-offs each strategy presents in curated datasets. The findings demonstrate how synthetic data can effectively substitute or be combined with real datasets to mitigate imbalance and privacy limitations. Code and generated datasets:https://www.github.com/AliAZ98/SyntFER

Multimodal emotion recognition on CMU-MOSEI faces an extreme imbalance as Happy accounts for 65.9% of samples while three Ekman categories collectively represent under 7%, causing standard fusion models to maximize accuracy by ignoring minority emotions entirely. We present Affect-Diff, a Causal-Diffusion Bridge that addresses this through three jointly trained mechanisms: a NOTEARS-learned causal graph that re-weights modality contributions before fusion, a beta-VAE bottleneck for regularized latent compression, and a stop-gradiented 1D DDPM prior that structures the latent space against majority-class collapse. On 3,292 aligned CMU-MOSEI samples, Affect-Diff achieves validation balanced accuracy 0.384, an 18% relative improvement over the strongest baseline (TETFN: 0.324), while all evaluated baselines produce zero F1 on Fear, Disgust, and Surprise. Ablation studies confirm independent, non-redundant contributions from the diffusion prior (-24% without it) and causal graph (-13%). Notably, only the deterministic-encoder variant detects all six emotion classes, revealing KL regularization strength as a direct lever for minority-class sensitivity.

Facial Expression Recognition (FER) has advanced rapidly over the last decade, driven by the shift from handcrafted descriptors and shallow classifiers to deep convolutional, attention-based, vision-language, and foundation-model architectures, and by the parallel growth of large-scale in-the-wild benchmarks spanning categorical, dimensional, compound, micro-expression, Action Unit (AU), and intensity-estimation tasks. Yet the deep learning-based FER landscape has so far been reviewed only along narrow task-, architecture-, or application-specific axes, leaving a holistic, systematically organized account of its recent advances missing. This survey addresses that gap with a comprehensive review of recent deep learning-based FER, explicitly linked to the wider Facial Affect Recognition (FAR) domain. Its main contributions are: a) A description of FER's evolution into five distinct phases, from handcrafted features and classical machine learning to attention-based, vision-language, and foundation-model approaches, with the key milestone works of each, b) A multi-criteria taxonomy analyzing the literature along seven complementary axes: recognition task, input modality, face pre-processing pipeline, network architecture, learning strategy, acquisition setting, and application domain, c) A per-criterion comparative analysis, with critical insights into the strengths and limitations of each category under in-the-wild conditions, d) A task-organized review of public FER datasets, with their annotation schemes, modalities, and evaluation protocols, e) A compilation of performance metrics and a per-task quantitative comparison of representative state-of-the-art methods on widely adopted benchmarks, and f) A discussion of current challenges and promising future directions.