Abstract
We present a systematic empirical study of transformer compression through over 40 experiments on GPT-2 (124M parameters) and Mistral 7B (7.24B parameters). Our analysis covers spectral compression, block-level function replacement, rotation-based quantization, activation geometry, and adaptive early exit. We identify five structural properties relevant to compression. (1) Variance is not importance: high-variance activation directions are approximately 96 percent uncorrelated with predictive directions (measured via CCA), and projecting onto these subspaces preserves over 90 percent of variance while degrading perplexity. (2) Block linearity is conditional: transformer blocks are approximately linear (R^2 ~ 0.95 on GPT-2, 0.93 on Mistral block 31) only under the correct upstream distribution; modifying earlier blocks induces distribution shift that degrades downstream approximations. (3) The reconstruction wall: approaches that factor weights into quantized components amplify errors through cross-terms, making direct quantization strictly superior. (4) Linearity increases with depth: Mistral 7B exhibits a progression from R^2 = 0.17 (block 0) to R^2 = 0.93 (block 31), indicating a division between nonlinear feature construction and linear refinement. (5) Approximately 30 percent of tokens are computationally easy, confirmed via exit heads and KL divergence sensitivity. We demonstrate that single-block linear replacement achieves 34x compression with a 1.71 perplexity increase on the final block of Mistral 7B, while multi-block replacement fails due to residual error accumulation and distribution shift. These findings suggest fundamental limits to static post-training compression and motivate adaptive, per-token computation as a more effective direction.
Explore similar work
Jun 12, 2026cs.LG
Transformer feed-forward networks (FFNs) are often treated as nonlinear stores of computation, yet how nonlinear a trained FFN block actually is has rarely been measured. We treat each FFN as a position-wise input-to-output map and split it into the exact least-squares linear approximation plus a residual. The held-out variance the closed-form linear map explains defines a block's linear recoverability (R^2_lin), an optimiser-free measure of its linearity. Across all twelve blocks of GPT-2, Pythia-160m, and llama-160m, R^2_lin is highly heterogeneous and non-monotone with depth, ranging from near-linear (>0.99) to strongly nonlinear (<0.3) between adjacent blocks, and is not set by the activation function: same-width GELU models GPT-2 and Pythia-160m have sharply different profiles, so recoverability is a learned property of individual trained blocks, not an architectural one. A low-rank bilinear probe of the residual recovers only a few points of R^2, with gain uncorrelated with residual nonlinearity: the unrecovered computation is not a single position-wise product but higher-order or distributed structure. The measurement also serves as a targeted compression signal: recoverable blocks admit large single-layer replacements (GPT-2's early FFN at 8x fewer parameters for +0.77 perplexity), while low-recoverability blocks flag where this is unsafe. It further exposes a methodological pitfall: trained linear baselines can badly under-converge on ill-conditioned transformer activations, so we report the exact closed-form least-squares ceiling throughout.
Stuart Whipp
Sep 22, 2026cs.LG
Transformer architectures exhibit cross-layer redundancies, yet post-training compression pipelines typically optimize layers in isolation or rely on heuristic grouping strategies that disregard layer-specific activation geometries. We introduce a principled, training-free framework that sequentially optimizes cross-layer weight pairings and shared-dictionary factorizations. Rather than forcing weights of adjacent layers to share a basis or heuristically merging activation statistics, our approach identifies structurally compatible projections and learns a shared representation that better preserves each layer's distinct calibration geometry. Coupled with structured sparsity, this yields highly efficient weight decompositions without sacrificing functional fidelity. Across diverse architectures, scales, and modalities, our method achieves state-of-the-art results, consistently outperforming independent structured weight decompositions and alternative pairwise weight factorizations, which operate under heuristic grouping strategies. By replacing heuristic engineering strategies with a convergent, optimization-driven pipeline, we establish a theoretically grounded foundation for scalable, transformer compression across different modalities.
Baher Mohammad, Ammar Ali, Stamatios Lefkimmiatis
May 15, 2026cs.LG
When researchers ask whether two transformer layers are "equivalent" for compression, they often conflate distinct tests. Replacement asks whether one layer's map can substitute for another's in place; interchange asks whether two layers approximately commute when their positions are swapped. Both are output-grounded swap-KL probes, but they need not agree: on pretrained transformers the protocol gap can change which layers look safe to prune by several-fold under the same evaluator, especially when replacement distances are high. We measure both protocols across checkpoints and architectures. On a Pythia training trajectory (410M and 1.4B), the replacement-interchange gap grows from initialization to convergence. Under one matched WikiText-2 contract at 8B scale, Qwen3-8B enters a divergent regime: interchange-guided removal is several-fold safer than replacement-guided at the same layer budgets, while Llama-3.1-8B ties the two protocols for pruning cost even though interchange KL is lower, showing metric gaps need not map one-to-one to removal. Before layer removal or merging, score both swap-KLs on the target checkpoint; the diagnostic requires only unlabeled forward passes.
Gabriel Garcia