All Eyes on the Workflow: Automated and Efficient Event Discovery from Video Streams

Event detection tasks in videos, the most important aspect of video surveillance, aim to detect events either at the pixel-level, frame-level, or clip-level. Plenty of methods intended for event detection in different environments, for various applications, and within different acquisition techniques were introduced. Naturally, the attempts were made as well to classify these algorithms in terms of detection of performance or in terms of real-time abilities. Nevertheless, the lack of a large-scale dataset as well as rigorous performance evaluation methods have biased such comparisons as well as the development of the methods. Given the diversity of existing approaches, we believe it is essential for researchers to position their work within such a rich landscape. Thus, we propose a rigorous framework for developing new methods in event detection for videos. Specifically, this framework is based on three main pillars: datasets, performance evaluation, and scenarios for deploying methods.

A key capability for video understanding is reliably linking subjects to events across time, yet whether Video Large Language Models (VideoLLMs) actually achieve this remains unclear. In this work, we introduce DistractionBench to evaluate whether VideoLLMs can robustly link subjects and events in the presence of unrelated video segments. Through controlled interventions, such as inserting short advertisement clips into longer videos, we show that VideoLLMs frequently hallucinate interactions between entities from different segments, incorrectly attributing actions from injected advertisements to subjects in the main video. We characterize this systematic hallucination as bag-of-events (BoE) behavior, where models process videos as collections of events rather than temporally structured sequences. Evaluating 11 popular VideoLLMs, we find that all models exhibit substantial BoE behavior. Our findings suggest that VideoLLMs lack reliable mechanisms for temporal grounding and motivate the development of models with more robust subject-event association.

Process mining (PM) provides a powerful framework for discovering and optimizing operational processes from event data. However, the efficacy of PM techniques is strictly predicated on the availability of structured event logs. Thus far, event logs have often been laboriously created by domain and process mining experts. This costly effort causes large portions of organizational knowledge, including incident tickets, manuals, and textual reports, to remain underutilized. We address this bottleneck by investigating the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) as automated data translators. We propose a scalable framework that leverages LLMs as data translators to bridge the gap between unstructured textual resources and structured event data. We finetune LLMs on a newly created text-to-log dataset, demonstrating that the resulting models can extract high-fidelity event logs from unstructured resources. Our results show that this finetuning approach outperforms few-shot or zero-shot prompting by a large amount, highlighting finetuning as a necessary pre-condition for generating reliable event data. We conclude that our method provides a promising pipeline for making previously unused data available to process mining ecosystems, effectively expanding the possibilities of using PM to further investigate organizational workflows.