A Digital Pathology Resource for Liver Cancer Quantification with Datasets, Benchmarks, and Tools

As hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining constitutes the primary entry point in routine diagnostic workflows, computer-aided diagnosis from whole-slide H&E images is of particular clinical relevance. However, substantial variability in specimen preparation, staining protocols, and scanning conditions, together with inherent uncertainty in expert pixel-level annotations, makes automated analysis of H&E-stained images challenging. In this study, we propose a semantic segmentation-based framework for image-level diagnosis, grounded in the clinically motivated assumption that each histopathological image corresponds to a single cancer type. Image-level predictions are obtained by assigning the class of the dominant pixel-level label in the segmentation output. To ensure clinical relevance, we adopt the nnU-Net architecture and train it on a publicly available dataset collected in our study with pixel-level annotations for three liver cancer types: hepatocellular cacrcinoma (HCC; 55 images from 30 patients), cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA; 55 images from 29 patients), and colorectal metastatic adenocarcinoma (CMA; 60 images from 30 patients). Annotations were independently provided by four pathologist. We hypothesize that the combination of stain normalization and semantic segmentation mitigates domain shift and reduces sensitivity to annotation noise. Five-fold cross-validation yielded balanced accuracy of 0.975 (HCC), 0.950 (CCA), and 1.000 (CMA), comparable to results obtained with immunohosthochemical staining and superior to several deep learning models trained on patch-level annotations. The proposed framework has the potential to support pathologists in prioritizing immunohistochemical marker selection, thereby reducing diagnostic costs and turnaround time. Integration with immunohistochemical findings improve overall diagnostic reliability.

Foreground segmentation is the critical first step of every computational pathology pipeline, yet existing methods rely on hand-tuned heuristics or supervised models that overfit to narrow stain and scanner distributions, failing silently on specialised stains such as Jones silver or Elastica van Gieson. We propose a coarse-to-fine approach that recasts foreground segmentation as a visual perception task and leverages general-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) as zero-annotation oracles. Our key insight is that tissue-versus-background discrimination is a natural-image recognition problem, not a histopathological one, so VLMs trained on internet-scale corpora generalise where domain-specific models cannot. We introduce Leica-75, a benchmark of 75 renal transplant whole-slide images spanning three stain families. On Leica-75, our method achieves the highest segmentation quality on out-of-distribution stains (Dice 0.858 +/- 0.027 on Jones, 0.853 +/- 0.041 on EVG) with 7x lower cross-stain variance than the best supervised baseline, while remaining competitive on in-distribution H&E. Few-shot prompting with automatically curated exemplars (Auto-context) rescues hard cases on Stress-32 (n=32), a curated stress-test subset (Dice 0.470 to 0.819 for the 2B model). VLM-based annotation review matches human expert consensus (kappa=0.989 for blur detection; mean precision/recall grading accuracy 0.708 vs. human 0.646 for segmentation mask review). The resulting pseudo-labels are used to distil lightweight student models that are as performant as the teacher model while running for a fraction of the cost. Our framework provides a principled, scalable solution to a persistent infrastructure bottleneck in digital pathology.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining is the cornerstone of histopathology, yet scalable, quantitative analysis of H&E whole-slide images (WSIs) remains a central challenge in computational pathology. We present Atlas H&E-TME, an AI-based system built on the Atlas family of pathology foundation models that predicts tissue quality, tissue region, and cell type labels across multiple cancer types, yielding over 4,500 quantitative readouts per slide at cell-level resolution. A key challenge to validating such systems is overcoming morphological ambiguity inherent to H&E-only ground truth and the limited scalability of more informed references drawing on modalities such as immunohistochemistry (IHC). We address this with a dual validation framework combining biologically grounded depth with technical and morphological breadth. For depth, we propose an IHC-informed multi-pathologist consensus protocol that substantially improves inter-rater agreement over conventional H&E-only annotation. This yields a molecularly grounded reference against which we compare Atlas H&E-TME and pathologists working from H&E alone. For breadth, we benchmark Atlas H&E-TME on over 200,000 high-confidence H&E-only pathologist annotations across 1,500+ cases spanning eight cancer types and their most common metastatic sites, with subtypes covering >90% of clinical cases per cancer type, drawn from 25+ sources and 8+ scanner models. Benchmarked against the IHC-informed consensus, Atlas H&E-TME matches or exceeds pathologist H&E-only performance and generalizes consistently and robustly across this broad morphological and technical scope. In doing so, Atlas H&E-TME turns the H&E slide -- the most ubiquitous data in pathology -- into a scalable, quantitative window into the tumor and its microenvironment, laying a foundation for the next generation of tissue-based biomarkers in translational and clinical research.