Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) extends traditional RAG by using knowledge graphs (KGs) to give large language models (LLMs) a structured, semantically coherent context, yielding more grounded answers. However, GraphRAG reasoning process remains a black-box, limiting our ability to understand how specific pieces of structured knowledge influence the final output. Existing explainability (XAI) methods for RAG systems, designed for text-based retrieval, are limited to interpreting an LLM response through the relational structures among knowledge components, creating a critical gap in transparency and trustworthiness. To address this, we introduce XGRAG, a novel framework that generates causally grounded explanations for GraphRAG systems by employing graph-based perturbation strategies, to quantify the contribution of individual graph components on the model answer. We conduct extensive experiments comparing XGRAG against RAG-Ex, an XAI baseline for standard RAG, and evaluate its robustness across various question types, narrative structures and LLMs. Our results demonstrate a 14.81% improvement in explanation quality over the baseline RAG-Ex across NarrativeQA, FairyTaleQA, and TriviaQA, evaluated by F1-score measuring alignment between generated explanations and original answers. Furthermore, XGRAG explanations exhibit a strong correlation with graph centrality measures, validating its ability to capture graph structure. XGRAG provides a scalable and generalizable approach towards trustworthy AI through transparent, graph-based explanations that enhance the interpretability of RAG systems.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems combine dense retrievers and language models to ground their outputs in external documents. However, the interaction between these components remains opaque, creating challenges for deployment in high-stakes domains. We present RAG-E, an end-to-end explainability framework that quantifies retriever-generator alignment through mathematically grounded attribution methods. Our approach adapts Integrated Gradients for retriever analysis, proposes a Monte Carlo-stabilized Shapley Value approximation for generator attribution, and introduces the Weighted Attribution-Relevance Gap (WARG) metric to measure how closely the generator's document usage aligns with retriever rankings. Experiments on PopQA, QAMPARI, and TREC CAST datasets reveal substantial misalignment: depending on the model and setting, generators often ignore top-ranked documents and rely on documents ranked as less relevant. We show that WARG captures retriever-generator alignment better than Pearson and Spearman correlations and can serve as an indicator of RAG performance. RAG-E and WARG provide a practical framework for auditing this interaction, enabling more reliable and transparent RAG systems.
Retrieval augmented generation (RAG) has enhanced large language models by enabling access to external knowledge, with graph-based RAG emerging as a powerful paradigm for structured retrieval and reasoning. However, existing graph-based methods often over-rely on entity-centric node matching and lack explicit causal modeling, leading to unfaithful or spurious answers. Prior attempts to incorporate causality are typically limited to local or single-document contexts and also suffer from information isolation that arises from modular graph structures, which hinders scalability and cross-module causal reasoning. To address these challenges, we propose CausalRAG2, a framework that rethinks knowledge organization for graph-based RAG through causal gating across hierarchical modules. CausalRAG2 explicitly models causal relationships to suppress spurious correlations while enabling scalable reasoning over large-scale knowledge graphs. We also introduce HolisQA, a benchmark for holistic comprehension beyond entity-centric matching. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CausalRAG2 consistently outperforms competitive graph-based RAG baselines across multiple datasets and evaluation metrics. Our work establishes a principled foundation for structured, scalable, and causally grounded RAG systems. Our code and HolisQA benchmark are available at https://github.com/Pwnb/CausalRAG2.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a powerful and widely used approach for improving large language models by grounding generation in retrieved evidence. However, RAG systems still produce incorrect answers in many cases. Why RAG fails despite having access to external information remains poorly understood. We present a model-internal study of retrieval-augmented generation that examines how retrieved evidence influences answer generation. Using circuit tracing, we construct attribution graphs that model the flow of information through transformer layers during decoding. These graphs represent interactions among retrieved context, intermediate model activations, and generated tokens, providing a graph, circuit-level view of how external evidence is integrated into the model's reasoning process across multiple question answering benchmarks, we observe consistent structural differences: correct predictions exhibit deeper reasoning paths, more distributed evidence flow, and a more structured pattern of local connectivity, while failed predictions show shallower, fragmented, and overly concentrated evidence flow. Building on these findings, we develop a graph-based error detection framework that uses attribution-graph topology features. Furthermore, we show that attribution graphs enable targeted interventions. By reinforcing question-constrained evidence grounding, we reshape internal routing so that answer generation remains guided by the question, leading to more effective integration of retrieved information and fewer errors.