Benchmarking PyCaret AutoML Against BiLSTM for Fine-Grained Emotion Classification: A Comparative Study on 20-Class Emotion Detection

Emotion recognition in natural language is a foundational challenge in affective computing, with critical implications for human-computer interaction, mental health support, and conversational AI. This paper presents a rigorous, unified zero-shot evaluation of three leading commercial large language models: Claude (claude-sonnet-4-6), ChatGPT (GPT-5.4), and Gemini (gemini-2.5-flash). The models were queried through their respective production APIs as of April 2026 on a fine-grained 13-class emotion classification task. Using a stratified 1,000-sentence sample from the boltuix/emotions dataset, which comprises 131,306 sentences across 13 categories, a single uniform prompt with no exemplars was applied identically across all models. Gemini achieves the highest accuracy (39.9%) and macro-F1 score (0.363), followed by GPT-5.4 (38.8%, macro-F1 = 0.291) and Claude (38.0%, macro-F1 = 0.159). All models excel on sarcasm and desire while consistently failing on love, confusion, and shame. McNemar tests reveal no statistically significant pairwise differences (p > 0.10), suggesting convergence at a shared zero-shot ceiling. Claude's markedly lower macro-F1 score exposes a class-imbalance prediction bias. These findings highlight the current limitations of frontier AI systems in zero-shot fine-grained emotion classification.

This paper presents a comparative study of classical machine learning and deep learning methods for sentiment classification on the IMDb movie reviews dataset. The machine learning pipeline uses TF-IDF features and PyCaret AutoML to evaluate Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine, while the deep learning pipeline implements BiLSTM and BiLSTM with an attention mechanism. Experimental results show that classical machine learning, especially SVM, achieves the best performance with an accuracy of 0.8530, outperforming the deep learning models in this study. The BiLSTM with Attention model improves over the standard BiLSTM and reaches an accuracy of 0.706, indicating better contextual modeling. The paper concludes that although deep learning can capture sequential dependencies, classical machine learning remains a strong baseline when combined with effective feature engineering such as TF-IDF, particularly under limited data and computational resources.

This study presents a comparative analysis between two primary approaches in Natural Language Processing (NLP): Machine Learning (ML) utilizing the PyCaret AutoML framework, and Deep Learning (DL). The evaluation is conducted on a sentiment analysis task using an Indonesian e-commerce review dataset sourced from Hugging Face. The dataset, consisting of 15,000 samples, is partitioned into training, validation, and testing sets. The ML experiments compare LightGBM, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms, whereas the DL experiment implements a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) architecture. The experimental results demonstrate that the BiLSTM model outperforms all ML models, achieving an accuracy of 98.87% and an F1-Score of 98.87%. Meanwhile, LightGBM emerges as the best-performing ML model with an accuracy of 98.23% in a highly efficient training time. This research proves that the BiLSTM architecture is highly capable of capturing the sequential context of Indonesian review texts, making it the superior model for this specific classification task.