Few-Shot Synthetic Accented Speech for ASR Fine-Tuning: What Helps and When?
Authors: Yurii Halychanskyi, Nimet Beyza Bozdag, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson, Dilek Hakkani-Tür, Volodymyr Kindratenko
Abstract
Synthetic accented speech is a promising way to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) when real accented recordings are scarce. We ask what makes such data useful for ASR fine-tuning: target-accent phoneme edits that expose the recognizer to accent-specific pronunciations, or random phoneme perturbations that act as augmentation in phoneme space. In a few-shot TTS pipeline, we compare LLM-generated accent edits with matched-rate random substitutions and oracle controls using ground-truth accented phonemes and prosody. Random substitutions recover much of the ASR gain: LLM target-accent edits improve over random by only a small margin, ground-truth phonemes stay close to the random baseline and nearly converge with it as the synthetic ASR fine-tuning set grows larger, and adding ground-truth prosody yields only a modest further gain. Mixing synthetic with real accented speech also stabilizes low-resource fine-tuning, but a fixed synthetic budget can later dilute the information in real data, showing that the real--synthetic ratio matters.
In regulated domains such as banking and healthcare, where privacy constraints make real speech costly to collect and retain, synthetic speech from modern text-to-speech (TTS) is an appealing alternative for training automatic speech recognition (ASR) without exposing sensitive customer recordings. Yet a persistent distributional gap between synthetic and real data limits how far it can replace genuine recordings. Prior work largely treats this gap as a black box to be engineered around, but in our work, we instead examine its origin directly by probing a SLAM-ASR architecture. Then, we localise where its LLM backbone separates real from synthetic speech and find the discriminative signal concentrated in the early-to-middle layers, where temporal and prosodic perturbations disrupt it most. We further show that representation-level separability, help, but does not directly predict downstream ASR gains. On the other hand, convolving synthetic audio with room impulse responses (RIRs) narrows the gap not by making synthetic speech sound cleaner or more natural, but by reproducing the acoustic irregularities of real recordings. Translating these findings into the training procedure, by adding a layer-selection module combined with RIR augmentation matches a fully real-data baseline using only 25% of the real speech (13.6h) and surpasses it at all higher proportions.
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems, despite achieving remarkable accuracy in general-purpose domains with native speech (L1), struggle in domains like Air Traffic Control (ATC) due to strong channel noise, a presence of non-native (L2) English accents, and data scarcity. We propose a synthetic data generation pipeline with acoustical properties simulations specifically designed to address this lack of real data to improve recognition accuracy in the ATC domain. Our approach leverages a combination of neural generation techniques, including Text-to-Speech, Voice Conversion, L2-to-L1 accent conversion, and a novel controllable L1-to-L2 accent conversion framework built to simulate accented speech. Our experiments with the Whisper model on the ATCO2 corpus demonstrate that fine-tuning with either synthetic data alone, or a mix of real and synthetic data, significantly improves the word error rate over out-of-the-box and real data only baselines respectively.
Synthetic speech offers scalable supervision for automatic speech recognition (ASR), but its benefit depends on text selection, reference speech, and augmentation scale. We present a phoneme-based TTS-to-ASR pipeline using a single TTS model jointly trained from scratch on Arabic, French, Italian, and Portuguese with the F5-TTS architecture and language-monolingual ASR systems cover 13 test sets. Across the synthesis-scale sweep, random augmentation improves over matched real-only continuation on 11 sets. In the selection comparison, PFGS improves over real-only training on 12 sets and over random selection on nine, with a maximum relative WER reduction of 19.3% against random selection. With target texts and synthesis counts fixed, reference-speech filtering reduces absolute WER by 0.29 and 0.59 points on Italian and French Common Voice, respectively. These findings support treating TTS augmentation as a synthetic-corpus construction problem, rather than merely a question of generation scale.