cs.DSApr 30, 2026

Matroid Algorithms Under Size-Sensitive Independence Oracles

Authors: Kiarash BanihashemMohammadTaghi HajiaghayiMahdi JafariRavizDanny Mittal

Organizations: *Equal contribution 1Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, USA.

Abstract

The standard oracle model for matroid algorithms assumes that each independence query can be answered in constant time, regardless of the size of the queried set. While this abstraction has underpinned much of the theoretical progress in matroid optimization, it masks the true computational effort required by these algorithms. In particular, for natural and widely studied classes such as graphic matroids, even a single independence query can require work linear in the size of the set, making the constant-time assumption implausible. We address this gap by introducing a size-sensitive cost model where the cost of a query QQ scales with Q|Q|. Nearly linear-time oracle implementations exist for broad families of matroids, and this refined abstraction therefore captures the true cost of query evaluation while allowing for a more faithful comparison between general matroids and their natural special cases. Within this framework we study three fundamental algorithmic tasks: finding a basis of a matroid, approximating its rank, and approximating its partition size. We establish tight results, proving nearly matching upper and lower bounds that show the optimal query cost is (up to logarithmic factors) quadratic in the size of the matroid. On the algorithmic side, our upper bounds are realized by explicit procedures that construct the desired solution. On the complexity side, our lower bounds are unconditional and already hold even for weaker distinguishing formulations of the problems. Finally, for matroids with maximum circuit size at most cc, we show that the quadratic barrier can be broken, providing an algorithm that calculates the maximum-weight basis with expected query cost O(n21/clogn)\mathcal{O}(n^{2-1/c} \log n).

Explore similar work

Sep 9, 2026cs.DS

A Sharp Barrier for Consistent Submodular Maximization: Any Improvement over 2-\sqrt{2} Entails Exponential Queries or Linear Recourse

Consistent submodular maximization studies the tradeoff between solution quality and stability when elements arrive over time. For a monotone submodular objective, which models diminishing returns, an algorithm maintains a set of at most kk available elements and changes only O(1)O(1) elements after each insertion. Dütting et al. [2025] established a tight 2/32/3 approximation with unrestricted computation and a polynomial-time 0.510.51 approximation. They left open at STOC 2025 whether efficient algorithms can match the offline 11/e1-1/e guarantee. We resolve this problem by proving that the supremum approximation achievable with polynomially many value queries and worst-case constant recourse is β=220.5858<11/e.β=2-\sqrt2\approx0.5858<1-1/e. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0, our randomized algorithm attains βεβ-\varepsilon with O(ε2)O(\varepsilon^{-2}) changes per insertion. Any fixed improvement requires exponentially many queries before one critical insertion or linear recourse of Ω(k)Ω(k) changes at that insertion, even with unlimited queries afterwards. This gap quantifies the cost of consistency: the current oracle hides which elements will be needed after an arrival. We also determine the exact curvature-dependent threshold 1(21)ϑ1-(\sqrt2-1)\vartheta, attain 11/eε1-1/e-\varepsilon for weighted coverage with O(ε1)O(\varepsilon^{-1}) recourse, and separate the existence of universal future-price certificates from their efficient computation. Our algorithm has a bounded-bit polynomial-time implementation for polynomial-bit rational oracle answers; the lower bound uses only logarithmic-bit rational answers.
Shi Fu, Qixin Zhang, Dacheng Tao
Aug 12, 2026cs.LG

Adversarial Resilience of Poisson-Process Submodular Maximization over Matroids: From Robust Offline Optimization to Full-Bandit Learning

We study nonnegative submodular maximization subject to a general matroid when the offline algorithm is given an arbitrary controlled value oracle. Our main result is an adversarial resilience theorem for the Spiteful Greedy Swap Poisson Process (SGS-Poisson): without modifying its Poisson intensity, single-element exchange rule, or spiteful drop step, the algorithm retains limiting approximation factors 1/e1/e for non-monotone objectives and 11/e1-1/e for monotone objectives. More precisely, under every controlled oracle f^\widehat f satisfying f^(S)f(S)ξ|\widehat f(S)-f(S)|\le ξ for every set SS, our implementation returns a feasible set with expected value at least (1/eε)\OPTO(kξ)(1/e-\varepsilon)\OPT-O(kξ) and (11/eε)\OPTO(kξ)(1-1/e-\varepsilon)\OPT-O(kξ), respectively, using O~(nk2ε2)\widetilde O(nk^2\varepsilon^{-2}) oracle calls. As a consequence, the offline-to-online reduction yields full-bandit CMAB algorithms for general matroid-constrained submodular rewards with exact limiting approximation-regret factors 1/e1/e and 11/e1-1/e and O~(n1/5k4/5T4/5)\widetilde O(n^{1/5}k^{4/5}T^{4/5}) regret.
Vaneet Aggarwal
Jul 21, 2026cs.DS

Stronger Memory-Query Tradeoffs for Convex Optimization: The Limitations of Subquadratic Memory

We prove two lower bounds for the first order oracle complexity of minimizing a dd-dimensional 11-Lipschitz convex function over the unit ball with mm bits of memory. We first show that any such (possibly randomized) algorithm must make Ω~(d2m)\tildeΩ(\frac{d^2}{\sqrt{m}}) oracle queries. For deterministic optimization algorithms, we show that Ω~(min{d1.6,d8/3m2/3})\tildeΩ(\min\{d^{1.6},\frac{d^{8/3}}{m^{2/3}}\}) queries are required. For all memory regimes of interest, these improves upon the previous best known lower bounds of Ω~(max{d8/3m4/3,d4/3m1/6})\tildeΩ(\max\{\frac{d^{8/3}}{m^{4/3}},\frac{d^{4/3}}{m^{1/6}}\}) and Ω~(d5/3m1/3)\tildeΩ(\frac{d^{5/3}}{m^{1/3}}) for randomized and deterministic algorithms respectively. Notably, due to existing upper bounds, our lower bound for deterministic algorithms is the first to show a sharp oracle complexity phase transition around md2m\approx d^2, where a polylogarithmic change in memory leads to a poly(d)\mathsf{poly}(d) change in the number of required oracle calls. Further, when the suboptimality is polynomially small in dd, our lower bound randomized algorithms is the first to show that Ω~(d2)\tildeΩ(d^2) memory is necessary to nearly match the optimal query complexity among algorithms without memory constraints. Previously, such a result was only known for the regime where the suboptimality is quasipolynomially small in dd.
Michael Menart, Aleksandar Nikolov, Ohad Shamir