Robust Linear Dueling Bandits with Post-serving Context under Unknown Delays and Adversarial Corruptions

Contextual dueling bandits form a cornerstone of preference-based decision-making, with critical applications in recommender systems and large language model alignment. However, standard algorithms rely on the idealized assumption of immediate feedback, a condition frequently violated in real-world scenarios such as prompt optimization. This setting introduces a unique theoretical challenge: unlike linear bandits, dueling bandit estimators lack closed-form solutions, rendering naive adaptations of standard weighting techniques biased. To address this, we formalize the problem of Contextual Dueling Bandits with Stochastic Delayed Feedback and propose two novel algorithms: Linear (LDB-DF) and Neural (NDB-DF) Dueling Bandits with Delayed Feedback. Central to our approach is a novel estimator that integrates an Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) mechanism directly into the loss function, ensuring unbiased correction for delayed or missing feedback. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis, establishing an O(d*sqrt(T)) regret bound for the linear setting and sub-linear guarantees for the neural setting. Extensive experiments on both simulated and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our propose.

We study stochastic linear bandits with delayed feedback under several delay models and establish near-optimal regret guarantees. Our results identify when delayed linear bandits exhibit the same qualitative behavior as multi-armed bandits (MAB), and when the linear structure creates fundamentally new challenges. Specifically, (1) for \emph{loss-independent delays}, where the delay does not depend on the realized loss (but potentially depends on the arm), we show that delays incur only an additive regret penalty. Under stochastic delays, this penalty scales with the expected delay, while under adversarial delays, it scales with the maximum number of outstanding observations. Notably, both delay penalties are dimension-free, improving upon the state-of-the-art results; (2) for \emph{loss-dependent delays}, we show that linear bandits are substantially harder than MAB: unlike in MAB, we prove matching (up to log factors) upper and lower bounds in linear bandits, whose delay penalty depends on the square root of the dimension. (3) for the \emph{delay-as-payoff model}, a special case of loss-dependent delay, we show that the optimal MAB guarantee, which depends only on the delay of the optimal arm, is also unattainable in linear bandits. Together, these results provide a sharp characterization of how delayed feedback interacts with linear generalization.

We study linear contextual bandits with paid observations, where at each round the learner observes a context, selects an action, and may pay a fixed cost to observe feedback from a subset of arms. We propose two Follow-the-Regularized-Leader algorithms with Best-of-Both-Worlds guarantees. The first, Agg-SPB, extends the SPB-matching framework of Tsuchiya and Ito (2024) by aggregating context-dependent stability terms, achieving the characteristic $T^{2/3}$ adversarial regret rate and logarithmic dependence on $T$ in stochastic environments. The second, CE-SPB, combines arm-dependent observation probabilities with an entropy-adaptive learning rate inspired by Kuroki et al. (2024). It achieves an entropy-adaptive $\widetilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ adversarial guarantee and polylogarithmic stochastic regret, while avoiding the minimum-context-mass dependence arising in the stochastic analysis of Agg-SPB. Both algorithms further extend to corrupted stochastic environments with explicit corruption-dependent guarantees. These results establish that logarithmic stochastic regret is compatible with the $T^{2/3}$ adversarial regime for linear contextual bandits with paid observations, while highlighting a tradeoff between sharper horizon dependence in stochastic settings and path-dependent matching without explicit minimum-context-mass dependence.