Adversarial imitation learning (AIL), a prominent approach in imitation learning, has achieved significant practical success powered by neural network approximation. However, existing theoretical analyses of AIL are primarily confined to simplified settings, such as tabular and linear function approximation, and involve complex algorithmic designs that impede practical implementation. This creates a substantial gap between theory and practice. This paper bridges this gap by exploring the theoretical underpinnings of online AIL with general function approximation. We introduce a novel framework called optimization-based AIL (OPT-AIL), which performs online optimization for reward learning coupled with optimism-regularized optimization for policy learning. Within this framework, we develop two concrete methods: model-free OPT-AIL and model-based OPT-AIL. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that both variants achieve polynomial expert sample complexity and interaction complexity for learning near-expert policies. To the best of our knowledge, they represent the first provably efficient AIL methods under general function approximation. From a practical standpoint, OPT-AIL requires only the approximate optimization of two objectives, thereby facilitating practical implementation. Empirical studies demonstrate that OPT-AIL outperforms previous state-of-the-art deep AIL methods across several challenging tasks.
Adversarial imitation learning (AIL) achieves high-quality imitation compared to behavioral cloning (BC), but demands substantial online environment interaction. Recent empirical work has explored initializing AIL algorithms with BC pretrained policies to address this limitation, yet a rigorous theoretical understanding of pretraining's role in AIL remains elusive. This paper provides a systematic theoretical analysis and introduces principled pretraining algorithms for accelerating AIL. We begin by analyzing AIL with policy pretraining alone, identifying reward error as the dominant source of suboptimality. This reveals a critical and previously overlooked gap: the absence of reward pretraining. Motivated by this finding, we develop a principled policy-reward co-pretraining approach grounded in a reward shaping analysis. Our analysis uncovers a fundamental connection between expert policies and shaping rewards, which naturally gives rise to CoPT-AIL, an approach that jointly pretrains both policy and reward through a single BC procedure. We prove that CoPT-AIL achieves an improved imitation gap bound over standard AIL, establishing the first theoretical guarantee for the benefits of pretraining in AIL. Experimental results confirm CoPT-AIL's superior performance over existing AIL methods.
Adversarial Imitation Learning (AIL) faces challenges with sample inefficiency because of its reliance on sufficient on-policy data to evaluate the performance of the current policy during reward function updates. In this work, we study the convergence properties and sample complexity of off-policy AIL algorithms. We show that, even in the absence of importance sampling correction, reusing samples generated by the o(K) most recent policies, where K is the number of iterations of policy updates and reward updates, does not undermine the convergence guarantees of this class of algorithms. Furthermore, our results indicate that the distribution shift error induced by off-policy updates is dominated by the benefits of having more data available. This result provides theoretical support for the sample efficiency of off-policy AIL algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that provides theoretical guarantees for off-policy AIL algorithms.
Imitation learning (IL)---training an agent to replicate expert behavior from demonstrations---underpins applications from robotics to language model training. Standard approaches such as Behavior Cloning (BC) are known to suffer from compounding errors and performance plateaus, particularly when the learner cannot perfectly represent the expert's policy (as is typical, e.g., in distillation). Two interventions are widely understood empirically to improve performance: querying the expert interactively along the learner's own trajectories, and using value function estimation en route to generating a policy rather than directly fitting the expert's full action distribution. We investigate the nature of these improvements and their potentially surprising interplay. Our main finding is that expert interaction relaxes the representational demands on the learner: one only needs a model capable of realizing the expert's value function, bypassing the (often stricter) requirement of realizing the expert's policy itself. Concretely, we introduce OVI, an interactive on-policy IL algorithm that is statistically efficient whenever the learner can represent the expert's value function and computationally efficient given access to a linear maximization oracle. We complement this with a negative result showing that interaction is necessary. Namely, without stronger assumptions beyond expert-value realizability alone, any offline IL algorithm must scale with the complexity of the expert policy class. Our findings bear out empirically. OVI outperforms offline policy-based (BC), interactive policy-based (DAgger), and offline value-based IL methods, with the largest gains when the learner network is substantially less expressive than the expert's.