MooD: Perception-Enhanced Efficient Affective Image Editing via Continuous Valence-Arousal Modeling

Emotional image editing requires more than applying affective filters or modifying predefined visual factors: an effective edit must identify what a particular image can afford for a target emotion. Existing affective image manipulation methods, including recent agentic variants, largely operate within bounded strategy spaces based on predefined factor taxonomies, knowledge libraries, or conventional editing templates, and therefore often miss image-specific, context-grounded strategies. We introduce EmoScope, a multi-agent framework that reframes the task from "how should I edit?" to "what can I edit?" EmoScope first discovers an image-specific editable space through emotion-conditioned affordance reasoning, then uses a semantic hierarchy of anchors, variables, and context to balance content consistency and emotional expressiveness before executing and verifying the edit. Because its plans are expressed as image-specific affordances rather than retrieved templates, EmoScope also exposes the editing strategy as an interactive surface for user refinement at the plan level. In a large-scale human evaluation covering all eight Mikels emotion categories, with 4,693 valid responses across 1,824 pairwise questions, participants preferred EmoScope over two competitive baselines by 88.1% on average. Attribution analysis further shows that EmoScope selects target-emotion-adaptive strategies rather than applying a uniform template. The same affordance-level plan also supports lightweight user refinement in an interactive pilot. Finally, we show that classifier-based metrics exhibit emotion-conditional blind spots toward non-stereotypical, context-grounded edits, and present a relative content-emotion preference-affinity landscape showing that EmoScope's advantage varies systematically across image-emotion combinations.

Emotion-aware artistic image generation requires an image to match the input prompt, follow the specified artistic style, and convey the target emotion. In this challenge, the main difficulty is that the visual and affective attributes available in the training data are not explicitly provided at test time. Without these attributes, the generator has to decide not only what to depict, but also how the target emotion should be expressed through color, lighting, brushwork, composition, line, and layout. This creates a control gap between the available test prompt and the fine-grained conditions needed for emotion-aware artistic generation. To bridge this gap, we propose EmoStyle, a Z-Image-based framework that converts the input prompt into a structured generation state. An LLM reasoner first predicts affective cues (valence-arousal, dominant emotion, and therapeutic-effect labels) and an aspect-ratio decision. Instead of using these predictions only as additional prompt text, we encode the affective fields into an affective condition vector and inject it into the denoising blocks through AdaLN-style modulation. This allows the inferred control variables to directly guide the generation of intermediate features. Since emotional expression is also style-dependent, we further train a dedicated LoRA adapter for each artistic style bucket and select the corresponding expert during inference, enabling the same affective cues to be rendered with bucket-specific priors for color, texture, brushwork, and composition. Finally, a lightweight VLM-guided candidate selection step ranks the generated images based on prompt alignment, style consistency, emotional expression, and visual quality. In Track 1 of the AffectiveArt Challenge 2026, our USTC_PI_LAB_TEAM submission achieved first place.

Traditional Image Aesthetic Assessment (IAA) methods mainly rely on regressing absolute Mean Opinion Scores (MOS). However, such a paradigm overlooks the inherently dynamic nature of human aesthetic perception, which relies on subconscious comparison against implicit visual references. Consequently, the lack of causal reasoning regarding aesthetic differences prevents models from learning generalizable aesthetic principles, thus limiting their generalization across diverse scenarios. In this work, we rethink the IAA task and propose Relative Edit-induced Difference Aesthetic learning (RED-Aes), a novel framework that leverages controllable image editing models to simulate the human aesthetic reasoning process. Instead of fitting absolute score distributions, RED-Aes explicitly learns the visual factors that drive aesthetic changes. To support this paradigm, we construct the RED-20k dataset, which comprises editing-based image pairs, quantitative aesthetic differences, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. Furthermore, we introduce a three-stage training strategy guided by a relative ranking consistency reward, optimizing the model solely via relative supervision. Extensive experiments demonstrate that RED-Aes achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple public benchmarks, exhibiting superior generalization capabilities.