Abstract
Preference optimization has become a central paradigm for aligning large language models with human feedback. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplifies reinforcement learning from human feedback by directly optimizing pairwise preferences, removing the need for reward modeling and policy optimization. However, recent work shows that DPO exhibits a squeezing effect, where negative gradients applied to rejected responses concentrate probability mass on high-confidence predictions while suppressing alternative responses. This phenomenon arises even in simple softmax models and can lead to systematic probability collapse during training. We introduce Gradient-Gated Preference Optimization (Gate-DPO), a method that stabilizes training by modulating rejected gradients according to the model's probability geometry. When updates target extremely low-probability responses, the gate attenuates harmful gradients while preserving standard optimization behavior. Gate-DPO addresses this optimization pathology without modifying the underlying preference objective and is complementary to existing methods such as extended SFT, IPO, and Cal-DPO. Experiments across multiple architectures and preference datasets show that Gate-DPO consistently reduces squeezing and improves chosen-response likelihood. Mass-dynamics analysis further reveals healthier optimization behavior, with improved preferred responses and reduced suppression of the overall distribution. Notably, smaller gated models can exhibit stronger chosen-response improvements than larger ungated models, suggesting that controlling gradient dynamics, rather than scale alone, is key to stable and efficient alignment.
Explore similar work
Jun 10, 2026cs.LG
Offline preference optimization has become a practical substitute for reinforcement learning from human feedback, but pairwise objectives such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and its variants use only the chosen and rejected responses stored in a static dataset. This leaves a useful signal unused: the response that the reference model itself would generate for the same prompt. We propose Direct Preference Optimization with Penalization (DPOP), a simple extension of DPO that augments the base preference loss with a gated penalty on reference-greedy responses. DPOP activates this penalty only when the current policy still assigns a lower likelihood to the preferred response than to the rejected response. On AlpacaEval 2.0, DPOP improves length-controlled win rate over DPO, SimPO, and AlphaDPO on both Llama-3-8b-it and Gemma-2-9b-it, achieving relative gains of 5.3% and 4.4% over baselines on the two models, respectively. Ablations further show that a SimNPO-style length-normalized penalty is stronger than NPO and token-level unlikelihood in this setting.
Pengwei Sun
May 27, 2026cs.CL
DPO has become a widely adopted alternative to RLHF for aligning LLMs with human preferences, eliminating the need for a separate reward model or RL loop. Recent theoretical analysis uncovers an asymmetric gradient behavior in DPO: the loss suppresses dispreferred responses substantially faster than it promotes preferred ones, causing the model to learn to avoid bad answers rather than to generate good ones. We propose AdaDPO, a Self-Adaptive variant of the DPO algorithm that introduces per-preference-pair, stop-gradient-based coefficients derived directly from the policy model's generation probabilities, with the reference model's probabilities as an optional component. AdaDPO is constructed to enforce equality of gradient magnitudes between preferred and dispreferred probabilities; the practical implementation balances per-token gradients and applies a numerical clipping bound for stability, while retaining DPO's original hyperparameter structure. On Llama-3-8B-Instruct trained on UltraFeedback under a SimPO similar setup, AdaDPO consistently outperforms DPO on AlpacaEval 2: it achieves higher length-controlled win rates (LC) in 81% of hyperparameter combinations, attains the global best LC (48.3%) and raw win rate (46.1%), and enlarges the LC-over-WR margin in 88% of combinations, indicating effective mitigation of length bias. Additional analyses on KL divergence, reward margin, and reward accuracy confirm that AdaDPO rectifies the gradient imbalance and yields more efficient optimization. Because it operates purely at the loss level, AdaDPO can be dropped into existing preference-based alignment pipelines without changing data collection or model architectures. The method requires only a few lines of code, and the same self-adaptive principle generalizes to a broad family of pairwise contrastive preference losses including SimPO, R-DPO, IPO, CPO, and ORPO.
Shaolong Chen, Madalina Ciobanu, Qingqing Mao +1
Apr 17, 2026cs.CL
Preference optimization is widely used to align Large Language Models (LLMs) with preference feedback. However, most existing methods train on a single positive-negative pair per prompt, discarding additional supervision available in preference datasets that typically contain multiple candidate responses. Motivated by this limitation, recent work explores group-wise preference optimization, which jointly contrasts multiple responses for the same prompt, but its empirical behavior and scalability remain underexplored due to the memory overhead of group-coupled objectives. In this work, we present a unified empirical and systems study of group-wise preference optimization and develop a memory-efficient implementation for group-coupled objectives. By instantiating first-order linearization with objective-specific per-response coefficients, our implementation preserves first-order gradients while decoupling samples during backpropagation, substantially reducing peak memory usage and enabling scalable training with larger groups. Across offline and online settings, we show that leveraging multiple responses consistently outperforms single-pair training. Furthermore, incorporating a negative log-likelihood (NLL) term on positive responses is critical for both performance gains and training stability.
Jixuan Leng, Si Si, Hsiang-Fu Yu +2