A Deeper Dive into the Irreversibility of PolyProtect: Making Protected Face Templates Harder to Invert

Face Recognition systems are widely deployed in real-world applications, but they also raise privacy concerns due to unauthorized collection and misuse of facial data. Existing adversarial privacy protection methods rely on input-space perturbations to obfuscate identity information, yet their protection can degrade when adversaries learn restoration or purification mappings that partially invert the transformation. We study this setting as an asymmetric adversarial attack, in which reverse manipulation becomes feasible because existing defense paradigms do not control reversibility. To address this problem, we propose Asymmetric Reversible Face Protection (ARFP), a restoration-aware extension of personalized face cloaking that integrates privacy protection, keyed recovery, and tamper indication in a single framework. ARFP consists of three components: Key-Conditioned Manifold Binding, which ties the protection transformation to a user-provided key; Adversarial Restoration-Aware Training, which introduces a surrogate restoration adversary during training to improve robustness against evaluated inverse purification attacks; and Authorized Reversible Restoration, which supports recovery with the correct key while providing nonce-based tamper indication. Extensive experiments under the threat models considered in this work show that ARFP improves resistance to the evaluated restoration attacks while preserving authorized recovery utility. These results provide empirical evidence of key-sensitive recovery behavior and tamper awareness in the tested settings.

In face recognition systems, facial templates are widely adopted for identity authentication due to their compliance with the data minimization principle. However, facial template inversion technologies have posed a severe privacy leakage risk by enabling face reconstruction from templates. This paper proposes a Layer-Based Facial Template Inversion (LBFTI) method to reconstruct identity-preserving fine-grained face images. Our scheme decomposes face images into three layers: foreground layers (including eyebrows, eyes, nose, and mouth), midground layers (skin), and background layers (other parts). LBFTI leverages dedicated generators to produce these layers, adopting a rigorous three-stage training strategy: (1) independent refined generation of foreground and midground layers, (2) fusion of foreground and midground layers with template secondary injection to produce complete panoramic face images with background layers, and (3) joint fine-tuning of all modules to optimize inter-layer coordination and identity consistency. Experiments demonstrate that our LBFTI not only outperforms state-of-the-art methods in machine authentication performance, with a 25.3% improvement in TAR, but also achieves better similarity in human perception, as validated by both quantitative metrics and a questionnaire survey.

Biometric templates are vulnerable to theft if stored without protection. Unlike passwords, a compromised iris cannot be reissued. Although existing cancelable biometric schemes address this problem, most still require an external key or token, introducing an additional attack surface. This paper proposes a cancelable contralateral iris template protection scheme that eliminates the need for a separate token or stored secret, satisfying the three requirements of ISO/IEC 24745: irreversibility, unlinkability, and confidentiality. The method fuses three enrollment samples per eye using Majority Vote Fusion to produce a stable template, and applies a salt-based bit permutation derived from the subject's enrollment ID. Combining the left- and right-permuted templates via a bitwise XOR produces a single Protected Fused Template. Since left and right iris patterns are statistically independent, fusing contralateral irises improves the accuracy of the system. An attacker must possess both iris codes and both salts to recover any useful information, yielding a larger effective key space than single-iris schemes. Experiments on three datasets, CASIA-IrisV4-Interval, CASIA-IrisV2 (two devices), and CASIA-Iris-Thousand, yield EERs of $0.36$%, $4.88$%, $10.80$%, and $3.35$%, respectively; the highest value reflects the more challenging cross-device scenario. These results demonstrate that our contralateral approach outperforms unprotected baselines while remaining competitive with state-of-the-art cancelable methods. %In addition, an ablation study confirms the benefit on both recognition performance and security. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scheme to combine tokenless multi-instance fusion and contralateral binding under ISO/IEC 24745.