MSD-Score: Multi-Scale Distributional Scoring for Reference-Free Image Caption Evaluation

Reference-free image-to-text evaluators are now standard for scoring image-caption alignment, yet it is unclear whether they respect semantic invariances. We present an invariance probe on five popular evaluators (CLIPScore, PAC-S, UMIC, FLEUR, and a deterministic LLM judge) under semantics-preserving perturbations along three axes -- spatial (flips, context-preserving repositioning, light rotations), object (scale, category), and socio-linguistic framing (cultural/economic adjectives with neutral and length-matched controls). Across curated slices of three detection datasets and three caption evaluation suites, we find consistent non-semantic sensitivities, where benign spatial edits and simple phrasing changes shift scores by $\approx$6--9% on average, and for systems separated by just 0.7%, these shifts can cause ranking flips in up to $\sim$37% of cases, particularly under spatial changes. A small human study also supports this finding and confirms that annotators generally judge perturbed pairs as equally correct, so these shifts reflect metric behavior rather than semantic change. We further propose invariance-calibrated scoring, a post-hoc adjustment that roughly halves median absolute sensitivity while retaining correlation with learned caption evaluators.

Image captioning evaluation remains a significant challenge, as vision-language models evolve toward more challenging capabilities such as generating long-form and context-rich descriptions. State-of-the-art evaluation metrics involve extensive computational costs associated with the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as judges, or instead suffer from the limitations of standard CLIP-based encoders, such as strict token limits, lack of fine-grained sensitivity, or lack of compositional generalization by treating captions as ``bags-of-words.'' We propose a new learned metric that tackles the aforementioned challenges, based on a lightweight cross-encoder that is initialized from a visual question-answering model checkpoint, balancing a strong weight initialization with computational efficiency. Our training scheme uses a carefully assembled data mixture for supervised learning, featuring adversarial LLM-based data augmentations to enhance model sensitivity to fine-grained visual-linguistic errors. We also introduce a new benchmark designed to assess detailed captioning evaluation across diverse scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed metric achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining the efficiency required for large-scale benchmarking, quality-aware decoding, or reward guidance.

The core objective of image captioning is to achieve lossless semantic compression from visual signals into textual modalities. However, the reliance on manually curated reference texts for evaluation essentially forces models to mimic specific human annotation styles, thereby masking the true descriptive capabilities of advanced foundation models. This systemic misalignment prompts a critical question: Is task-specific fine-tuning truly necessary for Remote Sensing Image Captioning, or is the perceived performance gap merely an artifact of flawed evaluation criteria? To investigate this discrepancy, we propose ReconScore, a novel reference-free evaluation metric. Rather than computing textual similarities, we assess caption quality by its capability to reconstruct the original visual elements solely from the generated text, effectively neutralizing human annotation biases. Applying this metric, we uncover a profound, counterintuitive truth: inherently powerful, unfine-tuned MLLMs surpass their fine-tuned counterparts in authentic zero-shot RSIC tasks. Driven by this structural discovery, we introduce RemoteDescriber, a completely training-free generation methodology. By employing ReconScore as a self-correction mechanism, we iteratively refine the semantic precision of MLLM outputs without any computational fine-tuning overhead. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that RemoteDescriber achieves state-of-the-art performance on three datasets. Furthermore, we validate ReconScore's reliability and analyze the flaws of traditional metrics. Our code is available at https://github.com/hhu-czy/RemoteDescriber.