cs.CVMay 8, 2026

Text-to-CAD Evaluation with CADTests

Authors: Dimitrios MallisMarco WangAhmet Serdar KaradenizElisa RicciAnis KacemDjamila Aouada

Organizations: SnT, University of Luxembourg · University of Trento · Fondazione Bruno Kessler

Abstract

Text-to-CAD has recently emerged as an important task with the potential to substantially accelerate design workflows. Despite its significance, there has been surprisingly little work on Text-to-CAD evaluation, and assessing CAD model generation performance remains a considerable challenge. In this work, we introduce a new evaluation perspective for Text-to-CAD based on automated testing. We propose CADTestBench, the first test-based benchmark for Text-to-CAD, based on CADTests, executable software tests that verify whether a generated CAD model satisfies the geometric and topological requirements of the input prompt. Using CADTestBench, we conduct comprehensive benchmarking of recent Text-to-CAD methods and further demonstrate that CADTests can also guide CAD model generation, yielding simple baselines that surpass performance of current methods. CADTestBench code and data are available at GitHub and Hugging Face dataset.

Explore similar work

May 18, 2026cs.LG

Text2CAD-Bench: A Benchmark for LLM-based Text-to-Parametric CAD Generation

Text-to-CAD generation aims to create parametric CAD models from natural language, enabling rapid prototyping and intuitive design workflows. However, existing benchmarks focus on basic primitives and simple sketch-extrude sequences, lacking advanced features essential for real-world applications and covering only traditional mechanical parts. We introduce Text2CAD-Bench, the first benchmark systematically evaluating text-to-CAD across geometric complexity and application diversity. Our benchmark comprises 600 human-curated examples spanning four levels: L1-L2 cover fundamental geometry with standard features, L3 introduces complex topology and freeform surfaces, and L4 extends to real-world domains beyond mechanical parts. Each example pairs dual-style prompts -- geometric descriptions mimicking non-expert users, and procedural sequences aligned with expert-level conventions. Evaluating mainstream general LLMs and domain-specific models, we find that current models perform reasonably on basic geometry but degrade substantially on complex topology and advanced features. We release our benchmark to drive progress in text-to-CAD research.
Liang Wang, Heng Meng, Zekai Xiang +4
May 27, 2026cs.AI

MUSE: Benchmarking Manufacturable, Functional, and Assemblable Text-to-CAD Generation

Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced text-driven 3D generation, yet Text-to-CAD remains far from supporting industrial product design. Existing benchmarks focus primarily on generating single-part CAD models and evaluate them using geometric similarity metrics that fail to capture functionality, manufacturability, and assemblability. To address this gap, we introduce MUSE, a Text-to-CAD benchmark focused on complex, editable boundary representation (B-Rep) assemblies. MUSE pairs practical design instances with structured Design Specifications and evaluates generated models through a three-stage protocol: code check, geometric check, and design-intent alignment. The final stage uses design-specific rubrics to assess functionality, manufacturability, and assemblability, moving beyond shape matching toward practical design quality. To enable scalable evaluation, we use a rubric-based visual language model (VLM) judge and validate its reliability through human annotation. Experiments on closed-source and open-source LLMs reveal a clear failure cascade from executable code to valid geometry and finally to engineering-ready design, with even the strongest models achieving limited success on fine-grained engineering criteria. Together, MUSE provides a realistic benchmark and evaluation framework for advancing Text-to-CAD from geometric generation toward true engineering design. Our project website, including the leaderboard, dataset, and code, is available at https://dong7313.github.io/muse-benchmark/.
Xiaoyu Dong, Zhi Li, Xiao-Ming Wu
May 7, 2026cs.CV

Text-to-CAD Retrieval: a Strong Baseline

Text-based retrieval of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models is a critical yet underexplored task for the reuse of legacy industrial designs. Existing CAD repositories are typically searched using filenames or directories, which limits the efficiency, scalability, and accuracy of design retrieval. In this paper, we formally introduce text-to-CAD retrieval as a new cross-modal retrieval task, aiming to retrieve semantically relevant CAD models from large-scale databases given natural language queries. Leveraging paired text-CAD annotations from the Text2CAD dataset, we establish a practical benchmark for this task. To achieve text-based retrieval, we propose a unified framework that learns multi-modal CAD embeddings from both procedural sequences and geometric point clouds. Specifically, a sequence encoder captures the construction logic of CAD models, while a point encoder extracts explicit geometric features. A text encoder is used to learn semantic representations of textual queries. During training, we introduce a novel feature decoder that reconstructs masked sequence features via cross-attention with text and point features, encouraging implicit multi-modal alignment. At inference time, we remove this auxiliary decoder to enable efficient retrieval using concatenated sequence-point features. Our framework serves as a strong baseline for text-to-CAD retrieval and lays the foundation for downstream CAD generation paradigms, such as retrieval-augmented generation. The source code will be released.
Honghu Pan, Zibo Du, Daxiang Liu +2