INO-SGD: Addressing Utility Imbalance under Individualized Differential Privacy

Poisson subsampling is the default sampling scheme in differentially private machine learning, largely because its unstructured randomness yields tractable privacy amplification analyses. Yet this same randomness introduces substantial participation variance: each sample appears in very different numbers of training iterations. In this work, we show that this variance is not merely a practical artifact to be tolerated, but a fundamental source of suboptimal privacy amplification. We prove that Balanced Iteration Subsampling (BIS), a structured scheme in which each sample participates in exactly a fixed number of iterations, achieves stronger privacy amplification than Poisson subsampling and is optimal at both extremes of the noise spectrum ($σ\to 0$ and $σ\to \infty$). Our analysis reveals that the privacy-noise tradeoff is governed not by maximizing randomness, but by eliminating participation variance while preserving uniform marginal participation across iterations. To translate this asymptotic theory into finite-noise guarantees, we introduce a practical near-exact Monte Carlo accountant for BIS, which removes the analytical slack of existing RDP and composition-based PLD analyses. Evaluations across more than 60 practical DP-SGD configurations show that BIS consistently outperforms Poisson subsampling in the low-noise regimes most relevant for high-utility private training, reducing the required noise multiplier by up to $9.6\%$. These results overturn the common intuition that more sampling randomness necessarily yields stronger privacy amplification: in DP-SGD, structured participation can be both more practical and more private. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/dong-xin-ao-andy/bis-mc-accountant.

Differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) enables private deep learning through per-example clipping and calibrated Gaussian noise, but its high-variance updates can reduce utility on challenging datasets. We propose \textbf{SMA-DP-SGD}, a \textbf{Spectral Memory-Aware Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent} method that augments DP-SGD with a fractional memory branch built only from previously privatized noisy releases. WeightWatcher-inspired power-law spectral exponents provide group-wise reliability signals, instantiated layer-wise in our experiments, to adapt the decay and effective memory depth. Private-history alignment, norm matching, and warm-up activation stabilize the memory contribution. Privacy remains transparent: conditioned on the private release history, the memory branch is fixed, and the only newly data-dependent term is the current clipped sum scaled by a fixed coefficient $β$. Hence, SMA-DP-SGD preserves a clean conditional sensitivity structure and exactly recovers group-wise DP-SGD when $β=1$. Experiments on CIFAR-100, CIFAR-10, and MNIST show competitive or superior accuracy over several DP optimization baselines, with the largest gains on CIFAR-100 and CIFAR-10. CIFAR-10 ablations show that $β$ controls the privacy--utility trajectory, while spectral and memory diagnostics confirm a controlled short-to-moderate effective memory depth and a small memory-branch ratio. Runtime analysis shows that the mechanism incurs additional overhead, about $2.94\times$ DP-SGD in our CIFAR-10 implementation, revealing a practical trade-off between adaptive private memory and computational cost.

Differential privacy (DP) is increasingly deployed to limit membership inference risk in machine-learning systems. Prior work has shown that DP-SGD can widen accuracy disparities across demographic groups, but this framing treats fairness as a purely outcome-side concern. We argue that privacy cost, the information leakage borne by each group, is itself a form of harm, and adopt a compensatory-fairness framework in which a group that involuntarily bears greater privacy exposure is owed proportionally greater benefit from the system. From this principle we derive the \emph{Privacy-Cost Equity Ratio} (PCER), a group fairness metric defined as a group's positive prediction rate normalized by its per-group overfitting gap. By a standard membership inference bound, this overfitting gap upper-bounds each group's vulnerability to inference attacks, making PCER a conservative measure of benefit relative to exposure. PCER needs only per-group train and test accuracy (no shadow models), making it a practical post-hoc audit tool. We evaluate PCER alongside standard fairness metrics across six benchmark--attribute combinations spanning tabular and NLP domains, under DP-SGD at a range of privacy budgets, and validate the overfitting-gap proxy against a direct threshold membership-inference attack. The results reveal patterns that outcome-based metrics miss. On COMPAS, PCER uncovers a persistent double disadvantage: the protected group bears both greater privacy exposure and worse predictive outcomes, something demographic parity gap masks entirely. Sensitivity analysis shows very strong privacy guarantees collapse both groups' overfitting to a numerical floor, rendering exposure-based audits uninformative in that regime. Together, these findings show that fairness audits of privacy-preserving systems must account for who bears the cost of protection, not only who benefits from its outcomes.