math.FAMay 8, 2026

Structure-Preserving Reconstruction of Convex Lipschitz Functionals on Hilbert Spaces from Finite Samples

Authors: Anastasis Kratsios

Abstract

Convex functionals are ubiquitous in applied analysis, appearing as value functions, risk measures, super-hedging prices, and loss functionals in machine learning. In many applications, however, the functional is only observed through finitely many exact pointwise evaluations. We ask whether a convex functional on a separable Hilbert space HH can be reconstructed, up to arbitrary uniform accuracy, by an explicit formula which preserves convexity and Lipschitz regularity and is finitely computable. We answer this affirmatively. For every compact convex CHC\subseteq H, every LL-Lipschitz convex functional ρ:CRρ:C\to\mathbb{R}, and every ε>0\varepsilon>0, we construct an explicit finite-sample reconstruction which is convex, LL-Lipschitz, and uniformly ε\varepsilon-accurate on CC. The construction uses only finitely many linear measurements b,H\langle b,\cdot\rangle_H, with bb lying in a finite-dimensional subspace of HH, and is exactly implementable by a ReLU\operatorname{ReLU}-MLP. Building on this, we introduce convex neural functionals (CNFs), a structured trainable architecture class containing our reconstruction, whose every admissible parameter configuration is automatically convex and Lipschitz, providing a principled foundation for learning convex functionals from finite data.

Explore similar work

Nov 14, 2025cs.DS

Learning and Testing Convex Functions

We consider the problems of \emph{learning} and \emph{testing} real-valued convex functions over Gaussian space. Despite the extensive study of function convexity across mathematics, statistics, and computer science, its learnability and testability have largely been examined only in discrete or restricted settings -- typically with respect to the Hamming distance, which is ill-suited for real-valued functions. In contrast, we study these problems in high dimensions under the standard Gaussian measure, assuming sample access to the function and a mild smoothness condition, namely Lipschitzness. A smoothness assumption is natural and, in fact, necessary even in one dimension: without it, convexity cannot be inferred from finitely many samples. As our main results, we give: - Learning Convex Functions: An agnostic proper learning algorithm for Lipschitz convex functions that achieves error ε\varepsilon using nO(1/ε2)n^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)} samples, together with a complementary lower bound of npoly(1/ε)n^{\mathrm{poly}(1/\varepsilon)} samples in the \emph{correlational statistical query (CSQ)} model. - Testing Convex Functions: A tolerant (two-sided) tester for convexity of Lipschitz functions with the same sample complexity (as a corollary of our learning result), and a one-sided tester (which never rejects convex functions) using O(n/ε)nO(\sqrt{n}/\varepsilon)^n samples.
Renato Ferreira Pinto, Cassandra Marcussen, Elchanan Mossel +1
Sep 2, 2026stat.ML

A Closed-Form Formula for Consistent Lipschitz Regression on Metric Spaces with Sparse Neural Network Realizations

Several classical machine-learning methods, such as KRRs and SVRs, are both computationally and analytically tractable since their estimators either admit closed-form expressions or are obtained by minimizing convex training objectives; neither feature is generally available for deep neural networks. We address this by introducing a simple closed-form ``two-stage'' compositional formula f^\hat{f} for reconstructing an unknown Lipschitz function f:XRf:\mathcal{X}\to \mathbb{R} on a metric space (X,ρ)(\mathcal X,ρ) from NN i.i.d. noisy observations. Our main result is a high-probability uniform (LL^{\infty}) recovery guarantee that jointly controls approximation and statistical errors while enjoying an optimization error of zero; in particular, we do not assume oracle access to an approximate ERM. Our secondary main results establish the optimality of our formula in three complementary senses. 1) Function space: On Ahlfors-regular metric spaces, the hypothesis class parameterized by our formula attains the optimal fat-shattering dimension. 2) Parameter space: Its dependence on the parameters is maximally numerically stable, in the sense that a smaller approximation error cannot be achieved with a smaller Lipschitz dependence on the model parameters. 3) Forward pass: Its dependence on the input is maximally regular, matching the Lipschitz constant of the target function ff. When X=[0,1]d\mathcal X=[0,1]^d is equipped with the \ell^\infty norm, f^\hat{f} admits algorithmic ReLU-MLP and exact ReLU-multi-head transformer realizations of depth O(log(N))\mathcal{O}(\log(N)) with O(N)\mathcal{O}(N) nonzero parameters.
Ruiyang Hong, Hrad Ghoukasian, Anastasis Kratsios
Apr 24, 2026cs.LG

SOC-ICNN: From Polyhedral to Conic Geometry for Learning Convex Surrogate Functions

Classical ReLU-based Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNNs) are equivalent to the optimal value functions of Linear Programming (LP). This intrinsic structural equivalence restricts their representational capacity to piecewise-linear polyhedral functions. To overcome this representational bottleneck, we propose the SOC-ICNN, an architecture that generalizes the underlying optimization class from LP to Second-Order Cone Programming (SOCP). By explicitly injecting positive semi-definite curvature and Euclidean norm-based conic primitives, our formulation introduces native smooth curvature into the representation while preserving a rigorous optimization-theoretic interpretation. We formally prove that SOC-ICNNs strictly expand the representational space of ReLU-ICNNs without increasing the asymptotic order of forward-pass complexity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SOC-ICNN substantially improves function approximation, while delivering competitive downstream decision quality. The code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SOC-ICNN-4B18/.
Kang Liu, Jianchen Hu, Wei Peng