Mutual Information Optimal Density Control of Linear Systems and Generalized Schrödinger Bridges with Reference Refinement

Solutions to the Schrödinger bridge problem and its generalizations yield feedback control policies for optimal density steering over a controlled diffusion. To numerically compute the same, the dynamic Sinkhorn recursion has become a standard approach. The mathematical engine behind this approach is the Hopf-Cole transform that recasts the conditions for optimality into a system of boundary-coupled linear PDEs. Recent works pointed out that for the control-affine Schrödinger bridge problem, this exact linearity via Hopf-Cole transform, and thus the standard Sinkhorn recursion, apply only if the control and noise channels are proportional. When the channels do not match, the Hopf-Cole-transformed PDEs remain nonlinear, and no algorithm is available to solve the same. We advance the state-of-the-art by designing a Sinkhorn recursion with memory that leverages the structure of these nonlinear PDEs, and demonstrate how it solves the control-affine Schrödinger bridge problem with input and noise channel mismatch. We prove the local stability of the proposed algorithm.

We study stochastic density control between Gaussian-mixture endpoint distributions under Brownian prior dynamics. Since the direct Schrödinger bridge between Gaussian mixtures is generally not available in closed form, we introduce a lifted path-space construction in which each trajectory is augmented with a source--target component label. Consequently, the problem decomposes into Gaussian component-to-component Schrödinger bridges with explicit marginal, drift, and cost formulas, while the mixture-level assignment reduces to a finite-dimensional entropic coupling problem with a Sinkhorn scaling form. We then analyze the projection obtained by discarding or forgetting the label. By construction, the projected law satisfies the original Gaussian-mixture endpoint constraints, but its relative entropy generally differs from the lifted relative entropy by a nonnegative conditional label-information gap. This gap reveals a path-space obstruction: the lifted optimizer cannot, in general, be identified with the direct unlabeled Schrödinger bridge after projection. We also derive the posterior-averaged Markov drift associated with the projected marginal flow, prove a kinetic-energy upper bound, and identify a common path-potential condition under which the projection gap vanishes. Several numerical illustrations showing density and shape control are recorded for a self-contained exposition.

In this article, we study unbalanced optimal transport (UOT) and establish a control-theoretic dynamical extension, which we call the unbalanced density control (UDC), for a class of Gaussian reference measures. In the static setting, we consider UOT with quadratic transport cost and Kullback--Leibler penalties on the marginals relative to prescribed Gaussian measures. We show that the infinite-dimensional variational problem admits an exact Gaussian reduction, yielding a finite-dimensional optimization over masses, means, and covariances, together with a closed-form expression for the optimal transported mass. We then formulate UDC for discrete-time linear systems, where the initial and terminal state measures are imposed softly through KL penalties and the intermediate evolution is governed by controlled linear dynamics with quadratic control cost. For this problem, we prove that any feasible solution can be replaced, without loss of optimality, by a Gaussian initial measure and an affine-Gaussian control policy. This leads to an exact finite-dimensional reformulation and, after a standard covariance-steering lifting, to an SDP-based optimization for fixed mass, again coupled with a closed-form mass update. We further establish existence of optimal solutions and identify a sufficient condition under which the affine-Gaussian UDC policy is deterministic. These results provide globally optimal solution methods for both Gaussian UOT and Gaussian UDC. Finally, we illustrate our results with several numerical examples.